ARTOSTROBIOIDEA Riedel, 1967
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2021v43a15 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DC259A19-9B35-4B33-AD9F-44F4E1DA9983 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5101766 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038DDA73-FFD9-FE78-05E1-FD0DFE544AD3 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
ARTOSTROBIOIDEA Riedel, 1967 |
status |
|
Superfamily ARTOSTROBIOIDEA Riedel, 1967
Artostrobiidae Riedel, 1967a: 148 View in CoL ; 1967b: 296; 1971: 657.
Artostrobiaceae [sic] – O’Dogherty 1994: 158 (= Artostrobioidea ) [as a superfamily].
Artostrobioidea – Matsuzaki et al. 2015: 55.
DIAGNOSIS. — The shell is tubular or with a highly angled, conical shape. They consist of two or three segments. Some members have a subsequent undulated thorax whose segmentations are not marked by inner-ring dividers.
REMARKS
The higher taxonomic position of this superfamily is based on Botryostrobus (Artostrobiidae) and Spirocyrtis (Artostrobiidae) . In Sandin et al. (2019), Ectotoxon (= misspelled Extotoxon originally, Stichopiliidae ) was grouped with both previous mentioned genera, but this was owed to a misidentification based on supplemental photos. Thus, this superfamily consists of the Artostrobiidae Riedel 1967a and the Rhopalosyringiidae Empson-Morin 1981 in the Cenozoic. The Artostrobioidea are highly abundance in environmental sequences from deep waters ( Sandin et al. 2019).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
ARTOSTROBIOIDEA Riedel, 1967
Suzuki, Noritoshi, Caulet, Jean-Pierre & Dumitrica, Paulian 2021 |
Artostrobioidea
MATSUZAKI K. M. & SUZUKI N. & NISHI H. 2015: 55 |
Artostrobiidae
RIEDEL W. R. 1967: 148 |
RIEDEL W. R. 1967: 296 |