Agyneta serrata ( Emerton 1909 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3674.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:981F80ED-96D7-40C7-8A3C-677954416A2E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6162422 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038D6700-FF3B-569E-118C-040DAADEB779 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Agyneta serrata ( Emerton 1909 ) |
status |
|
Agyneta serrata ( Emerton 1909) View in CoL
Figs 443–449 View FIGURES 443 – 449 , map 29
Microneta serrata Emerton 1909: 198 , pl. 4, f. 15. (Description 3).
Centromerus serrata Kaston 1948: 137 , f. 330–332. (Transferred 3 from Microneta View in CoL ).
Meioneta beaufortensis Barnes 1953: 4 , f. 1–2. (Description 3Ƥ). (Holotype 3, Paratype 3 from N.C., Beaufort, Carteret Co., June 16, 1952, Coll. R.D. Barnes, AMNH). Examined.
Centromerus emertoni Kaston 1972: 105 .
Meioneta serrata van Helsdingen 1973: 9. (Transferred 3from Centromerus View in CoL , synonymised Ƥ).
Agyneta serrata Buckle et al. 2001: 101 View in CoL . (Transferred from Meioneta ).
Type material: Microneta serrata Emerton 1909 , 3 HOLOTYPE from Boston, 20 Nov.1900. J.H. Emerton Coll., fence near the common (unique number 23039). MCZ, EXAMINED.
Diagnosis: Males are diagnosed from all other species in the genus by the tulip-shaped lamella characteristica ( Fig. 443 View FIGURES 443 – 449 ), from members of the group by the presence of extremely long spine-like extensions on the ventroretrolateral side of the embolus ( Fig. 445 View FIGURES 443 – 449 ). Females are diagnosed from all Agyneta by their deeply excavated proximal part of scape ( Fig. 447 View FIGURES 443 – 449 ).
Description: Male: Total length 1.31; carapace length 0.57, width 0.42.
CEPHALOTHORAX: Carapace light orange, shiny, finely reticulate; radiating lines, margin suffused with dark gray; trident mark present. Sternum light orange, suffused with dark gray. Clypeus height 2. Chelicerae light orange, with transverse dark gray suffused band, not excavated; seta-tipped tubercles absent; promargin five teeth, retromargin four denticles. Cheliceral stridulatory organ ~19 striae, well spaced throughout. ABDOMEN: Uniformly light to dark gray, sometimes with apical white hourglass mark. LEGS: Light yellow, femurs lightly suffused with gray; leg I total length: 2.07; leg III total length: 1.43; Tm I: 0.23, Tm IV: absent. GENITALIA: Palpal retrolateral tibial apophysis small, pointed and smooth; dorsal tibial apophysis reduced, rugose; two retrolateral trichobothria and one dorsal ( Fig. 443 View FIGURES 443 – 449 ). Cymbium triangular; glabrous depression present ( Fig. 443 View FIGURES 443 – 449 ); dorsal cymbial tubercle triangular, smooth; ventral tubercle triangular, rugose; prolateral notch medium ( Fig. 444 View FIGURES 443 – 449 ). Paracymbium apical pocket long, anterior pocket long and curved making a small cover, posterior pocket absent ( Fig. 443 View FIGURES 443 – 449 ). Embolus tip pointed, no retrolateral extension; basally with one spine; ventrally with numerous small spines; retro-ventrally with numerous large spine-like extensions; Fickert’s gland absent; ventral lamella reduced or absent; thumb going slightly over the embolus proper ( Fig. 445 View FIGURES 443 – 449 ). Embolus proper set apically, part about equal, not serrated with associated large prong ( Fig. 445 View FIGURES 443 – 449 ). Anterior terminal apophysis tip wide with long protrusions and one small basal prong; posterior terminal apophysis short with well sclerotized tip and basal prong; lamella characteristica large, square and with one pointed tip ( Fig. 446 View FIGURES 443 – 449 ).
Female: Total length 1.35; carapace length 0.57, width 0.41.
CEPHALOTHORAX: Same coloration as male. Chelicerae yellowish; promargin six teeth, retromargin five denticles. Cheliceral stridulatory organ ~19 striae, well spaced throughout. ABDOMEN: Same as male, sometimes with the typical white hourglass mark. LEGS: Same as male; palpal segments suffused with dark gray, palp tarsus normal, claw absent; leg I total length: 1.98; leg III total length: 1.41; Tm I: 0.25, Tm IV: absent. GENITALIA: Epigynum with proximal part of scape wide, deeply excavated; epigynal slits M-shaped; pit hook depression deep ( Fig. 447 View FIGURES 443 – 449 ); lateral lobes medium; stretcher and pit small ( Fig. 448 View FIGURES 443 – 449 ). Median part of scape long and wide; genital pores situated at base of lateral lobes pockets ( Fig. 449 View FIGURES 443 – 449 ). Internal genitalia with rounded ventral receptacula, dorsal receptacula elongated ( Figs 448, 449 View FIGURES 443 – 449 ).
Other material examined: CANADA: Ontario: Raymonds Corners, 25km N Kingston, 09.vi–15.viii.1977, rocky pasture, 132Ƥ, C. Dondale, J. Redner ( CNC). USA: Arkansas: no specific locality, 1Ƥ, W. Whitcomb, 25.vi.1964, 1Ƥ, 14.viii.1963, pitfall in pasture 33, Trafford, 07.vii.1965, alfalfa, 1Ƥ, Dumas ( CAS); Cove Creek, 22.ix.1962, 231Ƥ, 12.v.1963, 13, O., M. Hite ( CAS); Jonesboro, 12.i.1967, pitfall in Oak-Hickory, 13, Hite ( CAS); Meramec River, 14-18. vii.1966, 1 Ƥ, H.E.F, D.L.F. ( CAS); Pow-34, 22.vi.1963, 1Ƥ, W. Whitcomb ( CAS); Round Prairie, pitfall, 06.v.1965, 33, 06–21. v.1965, 1 Ƥ, 23.iv.1965, 33 ( CAS). Florida: 3.2km SE Marathon, 15.xii.1962, 32345Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); 12km NNW Stuart, 12.xii.1962, 23, W. Ivie ( AMNH); 16km W Gainesville, 14.ii.1942, 1Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Archibold Biological Station, iv.1956, rotten log and stump, litter of Pinus claura , 2Ƥ, C. Hoff ( AMNH); Big Pine Key (east end) 13.xii.1962, 13, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Big Pine Key, Cactus Hammock, 02.ix–15.xii.1986, pitfall in forest, 1Ƥ, S., J. Peck ( AMNH); Big Pine Key, Watsons Hammock, 23.ii–03.vi.1986, malaise-flight interception trap in hammock forest, 23, S., J. Peck ( AMNH); Cape Sable, 27.ii.1936, 1Ƥ, Crosby, Bishop ( AMNH); Dunedin, 31.xii.1925, 1Ƥ, W. Blatchley ( AMNH); Fort Myers Beach, 17.iii.1954, 232Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Fort Myers vicinity, xii.1934, 231Ƥ, W. Barrows ( AMNH); Gainesville 01.i.1926, 13, Hubbell, 14.i.1939, 1Ƥ, 10.ii.1942, 539Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Gainesville, 01–14.ii.1979, pan trap in oak-pine, 131Ƥ, E. Becker ( CNC); Gainesville, Newmans’s Lake, 13.vi.1935, 333Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Gainesville, W Newmans’s Lake, 12.ii.1942, 1Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Lignum Vitae Key, vii.1981, Malaise trap, 23, S. Peck ( CNC); Micanopy, 06.iii.1927, 13, W. Barrows ( AMNH); South Miami, Deering Estate Park, SW 167 street and SW 72 avenue, 01.vi–25.viii.1986, malaise in young hammock forest, 434Ƥ, S., J. Peck ( AMNH); Sugarloaf Key, Kitchings, malaise in young hammock forest, 19.xi.1985 – 26.ii.1986, 13, 26.ii–06. vi.1986, 13, S., J. Peck ( AMNH); Sugarloaf Key, SE ¼, 29.viii–14.xii.1986, malaise in young hammock forest, 1Ƥ, S., J. Peck ( AMNH). Georgia: 1.6km N Sylvania, 10.iv.1943, 1Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Stone Mountain, 04.ii.1931, 1Ƥ, H. Dietrich ( AMNH); Little Cumberland Island, 15-19. iii.1997, 13, W. Steiner ( USNM). Missouri: Knob Noster State Park, 15–22.iv.1978, 131Ƥ, 01–08. v.1978, 1 Ƥ, 05–12. vi.1978, 13, 23–31. vii.1978, 13, 14–21. viii.1978, 13, 26.iii–03. iv.1979, 1 Ƥ, 16–22. iv.1979, 13, 16–26.v.1979, 131Ƥ, pitfall in bushy prairie, S. Peck, Peaslee ( CAS); Rolla, 25.vi.1963, 1Ƥ, H.E.F ( CAS). New York: Crosby, x.1903, 1 Ƥ, C. Crosby ( AMNH); Sea Cliff, 1Ƥ ( AMNH). Oklahoma: Stillwater, vi–ix.1966, 1 Ƥ, C. Bailey (JCC). Pennsylvania: 4.8km S Rector, 20.vi.1967, 1Ƥ, B. Vogel ( AMNH); Pittsburgh, 02.v.1968, 1Ƥ, B. Vogel ( AMNH). Texas: no specific locality, i–iii.1936, 431Ƥ, xii.1936, 13, L. Davis ( AMNH); 6.4km E Santa Maria, ix.1936, 1 Ƥ, L. Davis ( AMNH); 12km NE Sinton, 11.viii.1959, 13, 22.iii.1960, 13, 05.iv.1960, 13, 28.iv.1960, 131Ƥ, 26.v.1960, 23, H. Laughlin ( AMNH); 12km NE Sinton, 26.v.1960, 23, W. Ivie ( AMNH); 17km N LaGrange, 18.vii.1966, 1Ƥ, J., W. Ivie ( AMNH); Blackhole, Camp Bullis, 07.vi.1994, 23, J. Ivy, G. Veni ( TMM); Ebert Cave, 21.v.1994, 1Ƥ, G. Veni (JCC); Edinburg, xii.1935, 2 Ƥ, 01.v.1936, 534Ƥ, S. Mulaik ( AMNH); Fresnos Resaca, 6.4km S Harlingen, v.1937, 13, L. Davis ( AMNH); Houston, 11.vi.1937, 13, S. Mulaik ( AMNH); Rio Grande City, 01.v.1937, 1Ƥ, S. Mulaik ( AMNH); Southmost Palms, Brownsville, iv.1941, 1 Ƥ, L. Davis ( AMNH); Valley Cave, iii.1994, 13, M. Warton ( TMM); Wurzbach Bat Cave, 22.v.1993, 1Ƥ, J. Loftin, J. Reddell, M. Reyes ( TMM). Virginia: 6 km S Zuni at Blackwater River, 14- 15. vi.1989, 1 Ƥ, W. Steiner ( USNM). Wisconsin: Oliver Prairie, vi.1968, 1 Ƥ, 23.v.1969, 13, 27.v.1969, 231Ƥ, litter, S. Riechert ( TMM). West Virginia: Glendale, 29.vii.1973, grassy hillside, 2Ƥ, J. Redner ( CNC).
Distribution: Eastern USA, west to Texas and Ontario.
The lophophor View in CoL group includes only two species A. lophophor ( Chamberlin & Ivie 1933) View in CoL and A. girardi View in CoL n. sp., both widely distributed.
This small group shares a unique character, the presence of a rugose extension on the apico-ventral part of the embolus ( Figs 453 View FIGURES 450 – 458 arrow, 461).
The group can be characterized by the combination of these characters: males and females without abdominal pattern; males chelicerae excavated, both margins with a projection near base of fang. Cymbium without tubercles and prolateral notch ( Figs. 452 View FIGURES 450 – 458 , 460 View FIGURES 459 – 465 ). Palpal tibia with two retrolateral and one dorsal trichobothria; tibial apophysis reduced; paracymbium with small apical, anterior and posterior pockets ( Figs 450 View FIGURES 450 – 458 , 459 View FIGURES 459 – 465 ). Embolus with enlarged base; ventral lamella present; thumb very long, reaching well beyond the embolus proper; embolus proper set apically, on a short horizontal ridge; Fickert’s gland present ( Figs 453 View FIGURES 450 – 458 , 461 View FIGURES 459 – 465 ). Females are characterized by a epigynum with proximal part of scape narrow; extremely large epigynal slits, not completely filled by the lateral lobes; pit hook depression wide but shallow ( Figs 455 View FIGURES 450 – 458 , 463 View FIGURES 459 – 465 ) and stretcher absent ( Figs 457 View FIGURES 450 – 458 , 465 View FIGURES 459 – 465 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Agyneta serrata ( Emerton 1909 )
Dupérré, Nadine 2013 |
Agyneta serrata Buckle et al. 2001 : 101
Buckle 2001: 101 |
Meioneta serrata
Helsdingen 1973: 9 |
Centromerus emertoni
Kaston 1972: 105 |
Meioneta beaufortensis
Barnes 1953: 4 |
Centromerus serrata
Kaston 1948: 137 |
Microneta serrata
Emerton 1909: 198 |