Fortuynia
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s13127-022-00557-9 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038B87EB-FF81-9D6A-FCCB-FCE8FC1F27E9 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Fortuynia |
status |
|
Fortuynia View in CoL e. micromorpha
The populations of F. e. micromorpha were overlapping in NMDS conducted on females as well as on males ( Fig. 5 View Fig ). This was true for the raw data as well as for the size-corrected data, although in size-corrected data of females a separation between the population from Umdloti and the populations from Umkomaas and Mtwalume (and partly also Sheffield) was present.
LDAs on both raw and size-corrected data of F. e. micromorpha females revealed a separation caused by the first two axes between the populations from Umdloti, Umkomaas, Mtwalume, and Sheffield, whereas the latter two formed a cluster in the size-corrected data ( Fig. 5 View Fig ). The variables with highest loadings (and thus most responsible for separation between populations) in the raw data were nwda, nwdp, and dcg on axis 1 and ll, nwda, gl, al, and aw on axis 2. In the size-corrected data, highest loadings were present in nwda on axis 1 and in nwda and nwdp on axis 2 (Supporting Table S 2). The power of classification by LDA was low: 10% of specimens in raw and 15% in size-corrected data were correctly classified. In accordance with this result, PERMANOVA on both raw and size-corrected data revealed no significant differences between the female populations .
In contrast to the females, the males from the four populations of F. e. micromorpha were not clearly separated by LDA. In both raw and size-corrected data, small overlapping areas were present between the populations. In the raw data, variables with highest loadings were ll and dcg on axis 1 and nwdp and nwdm on axis 2. Variables with highest loadings in size-corrected data were ll and dcg on axis 1 and ll and nwdp on axis 2 (Supporting Table S2). The power of classification by LDA was better than in females; 39.39% were correctly classified in raw and 36.36% in size-corrected data. PERMANOVA showed that there were significant differences (p <0.01) between at least one of the male populations and the others in both raw and size-corrected data. Pairwise comparisons of the populations revealed significant differences (Bonferroni corrected p value p <0.05) only between the populations from Umdloti and Umkomaas in size-corrected data.
Significant differences between the dispersion of populations could not be detected in any sex, or in raw or size-corrected data.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.