Phillipsia hydei M. Zeng & Q. Zhao, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.395.4.3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13718232 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038B87C5-CC0C-B16F-FF4E-20ACFAC6FBB7 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Phillipsia hydei M. Zeng & Q. Zhao |
status |
sp. nov. |
Phillipsia hydei M. Zeng & Q. Zhao View in CoL , sp. nov. Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 , 3 View FIGURE 3
Index Fungorum number: IF 555284; Facesoffungi number: FoF 04823.
Etymology: The epithet in honor of Kevin D. Hyde for his contributions to mycology.
Holotype: MFLU 18-0714 View Materials .
Saprobic on dead wood. Sexual morph: Ascomata 0.5−2 mm high, 5−12 mm broad, superficial, scattered, sessile. Receptacle discoid, concave, reddish to red, margin conspicuous when fresh, involute, hymenium reddish, receptacle surface yellowish to orange or reddish, wrinkled when dry. Medullary excipulum 90−150 μm broad, of textura intricata, hyaline, composed of 3−4 μm broad hyphae. Ectal excipulum 47−73 μm broad, of textura porrecta, hyaline, composed of 2−4 μm broad hyphae, J-. Paraphyses 2−3 μm broad at the middle, filiform, exceeding the asci sightly, reddish contents, septate, branched, J-. Asci 166−200 × 8.5−12 μm, 8-spored, operculate, subcylindrical, stipitate, J-. Ascospores [20/1/1, in H 2 O] (17.2–)18−20(–21) ×(9.6–)9.8−10.4(–10.6) (Q = 1.72−2.20, Q = 1.86±0.12), ellipsoid with rounded ends, uniseriate, inequilateral, inamyloid, uniguttulate or biguttulate, very faint striations, with gelatinous sheath in 5% KOH. Asexual morph: Unknown.
Material examined:— THAILAND, Ranong, on unidentified dead wood, 5 October 2017 ; M. Zeng , ST05 ( MFLU 18-0714 View Materials , holotype) ; ibid. ( HKAS 97492 View Materials , isotype) ; THAILAND, Ron Thong , Prachuap Khiri Khan, on unidentified dead wood, 28 August 2017 ; C.G. Lin , 1-2 ( MFLU 18-1329 View Materials , HKAS 97489 View Materials ) ; ibid. 1-3 ( MFLU 18-0712 View Materials , HKAS 97490 View Materials ) .
Note: This species is characterized by red, sessile apothecia, reddish paraphyses and ornamented ascospores with gelatinous sheath. Phylogenetic results show a close relationship between P. hydei and P. carnicolor . But there are three major morphological differences between these two species: 1). Colors of apothecia: P. hydei has red apothecia ( FIG. 2 View FIGURE 2 ), but the apothecia of P. carnicolor shows distinct orange color ( FIG. 4 View FIGURE 4 ). 2). Shape of apothecia: P. hydei has sessile discoid apothecia ( FIG. 2 View FIGURE 2 , h) and P. carnicolor has short stalked ( FIG. 4 View FIGURE 4 , c), cupulate to irregular apothecia. 3). Colors of paraphyses: within the genus Phillipsia , content of paraphyses is a very important feature to identify ( Hansen et al. 1999). We observed reddish paraphyses in P. hydei and yellowish paraphyses in P. carnicolor respectively.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.