Schizoretepora sp. nov.?, Gregory, 1893
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2019.536 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EC4DDAED-11A3-45AB-B276-4ED9A301F9FE |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038B87B1-3311-653D-FA12-FD41F20FF961 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Schizoretepora sp. nov.? |
status |
|
Schizoretepora sp. nov.? (= S. imperati sensu O’Donoghue & de Watteville 1939 )
Fig. 11 View Fig , Table 6 View Table 6
Non Retepora imperati – O’Donoghue & de Watteville 1939: 25–26.
Material examined
EGYPT • 1 colony; Mediterranean Sea, Alexandria; coll. O’Donoghue; labelled Retepora imperati ; NHMUK 1963.9 About NHMUK .4.12 .
Description
Colony erect, regularly fenestrate (reteporiform); frontal faces bearing autozooids, abfrontal faces consisting of sheets of kenozooids. Trabeculae with 2–6 longitudinal rows of autozooids arranged quincuncially. Fenestrae oval, 1–2 times as wide as trabeculae ( Fig. 11A, E View Fig ).
Autozooids longer than wide, convex, separated by distinct raised sutures. Frontal shield notably nodular, with 2–5 conspicuous areolae ( Fig. 11 View Fig C–D).
Primary orifice semi-elliptical, longer than wide, distal rim with 18 blunt, triangular denticles, proximal border with U-shaped sinus (wider than long) framed by two acute denticles that form a gutter on the proximal peristomial rim and flanked by smooth condyles, sloping towards the edges of the sinus ( Fig. 11B View Fig ).
Peristome relatively low, allowing most of the primary orifice features to be observed, with continuous proximal peristomial rim ( Fig. 11B View Fig ). Two oral spines, articulated, fragile and easily broken; only their bases remaining in older zooids ( Fig. 11D View Fig ). Although no club-like spines have been observed, there are differences in the diameter of their basis, supporting the possibility of their being present.
Giant avicularia on large cystid (with 2 pores) and very conspicuous; placed in different level of frontal and directed proximally or laterally; triangular, with straight borders and a hooked tip ( Fig. 11D View Fig ).
Ovicells were not observed.
Abfrontal convex and notably rugose, with large polygonal kenozooids separated by raised sutures and 1–3 pores ( Fig. 11E View Fig ). Abfrontal avicularia always triangular, with straight margins, hooked, variable in number but occasionally very numerous, of two different sizes, larger ones at basis of fenestrae; with slender crossbar, wide triangular lacuna and without columella ( Fig. 11F View Fig ).
Remarks
This specimen seems closely related to S. imperati , with a similar general shape, a relatively low peristome, an orifice, spines and frontal as well as abfrontal avicularia. Nevertheless, there are subtle differences in the appearance: the surface is more nodular and the giant avicularia are somehow different, with straight or slightly convex margins and a more acute profile (VAL/VAW> 2). The most remarkable differences, however, are in the biometric analysis ( Fig. 3 View Fig ), with it being smaller than the rest of species studied.
The rugose aspect of the frontal is reminiscent that of S. aviculifera , but it differs in the lack of frontal adventitious, almond-like avicularia.
O’Donoghue & de Watteville (1939) identified this species as Retepora imperati , though expressing doubts about the number of existing species of Retepora at that time. They already pointed out the difficulties in identifying specimens of Reteporidae , taking into account the ontogenetic differences, age of colony and differential criteria used by each author.
Overall, the little existing material, the lack of an ovicell in the examined specimen, and the sole location (Alexandria; south-eastern corner of the Mediterranean) renders the status of this possible new species dubious.
N | MEAN | SD | MIN | MAX | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FL | 9 | 1056 | 178 | 825 | 1335 |
FW | 14 | 458 | 64 | 335 | 542 |
TW | 24 | 493 | 87 | 369 | 686 |
AzL | 30 | 357 | 35 | 301 | 450 |
AzW | 24 | 258 | 36 | 200 | 350 |
OL | 32 | 92 | 8 | 77 | 101 |
OW | 41 | 82 | 6 | 69 | 92 |
ApL | 15 | 92 | 6 | 80 | 102 |
ApW | 10 | 89 | 7 | 79 | 98 |
VAL | 19 | 183 | 26 | 134 | 227 |
VAW | 24 | 74 | 16 | 44 | 99 |
AbAL | 21 | 151 | 29 | 89 | 199 |
AbAW | 20 | 56 | 13 | 38 | 84 |
AbVL | 13 | 277 | 24 | 223 | 300 |
AbVW | 11 | 95 | 12 | 80 | 115 |
Ns | 20 | 2 | - | 2 | 3 |
Np | 28 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
Np_Ab | 30 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Schizoretepora sp. nov.?
Madurell, Teresa, Jones, Mary Spencer & Zabala, Mikel 2019 |
Retepora imperati
Busk 1884: 25 |