Ploiaria vandoesburgi, Rédei, 2008

Rédei, Dávid, 2008, A New Species Of Ploiaria (Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Emesinae) From Peninsular Malaysia, Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 56 (1), pp. 11-15 : 11-15

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5354423

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038B5506-C001-FFC3-6C9A-2EF5DAE6FEA4

treatment provided by

Diego

scientific name

Ploiaria vandoesburgi
status

sp. nov.

Ploiaria vandoesburgi , new species ( Figs. 1–17 View Figs View Figs )

Type material examined. – Holotype male: “MALAYA \ (Pahang) \ Genling-0002. \ 16. IV [?]. 74 \ P. Roche ” [handwritten]; “7569.” [handwritten]; “Ex-coll. \ P.J.L. Roche ” [printed] (Nationaal Natuurhistorische Museum, Leiden, the Netherlands). The specimen is micropinned and in good condition, apart from segment I of the left antenna being glued to a triangular card and pinned under the specimen, the apex of the femur and tibia and tarsus of the right mid leg and both hind legs are missing. The pygophore is removed from the body and glued on a card separately, the phallus is preserved in glycerol in a plastic microvial, pinned with the specimen.

Diagnosis. – Readily recognized among other Oriental species of Ploiaria by the combination of the following characters: fore trochanter with a strong spine set on a conspicuous projection which is longer than the width of the trochanter; fore femur with several small, circular brown spots; pygophore with a single spine-like apical process.

Description. – Macropterous male.

Colour. Head yellowish-brown; ventral surface as well as mandibular and maxillary plates dark brown; two narrow submedian longitudinal lines on anteocular part as well as postocular part posteriorly (except median longitudinal carina) and two spots between eyes confluent to latter area brown. Labium dark brown, slightly lightened at its apex; apical halves of visible segments I and II, a narrow basal ring on visible segment III whitish. Antennal segments I, II and IV light brown; segment I with a narrow basal annulus dark brown and an adjacent wider subbasal annulus whitish; segment II darkened towards apex, extremely narrowly whitish apically; segment III brown. Prothorax dark brown laterally, distinctly lighter brown dorsally; mesonotum dark brown, slightly lighter at base; thoracic sternum and pleuron uniformly dark brown. Fore wing transparent, with transverse brown spots between M+Cu and PCu+1A on basal half and with irregular, frequently confluent dull brown spots on apical half; anterior margin with brown spots at apex and middle. Abdomen dark brown ventrally; tergites brown; ventral laterotergites II–VIII each with a whitish spot around spiracle. Fore coxa brown with irregular, frequently confluent dark brown spots; trochanter dark brown with lighter spots; femur light brown with apex, base and two wide irregular annuli brown, and with several small, rounded dark brown spots; tibia dark brown with a distinct narrow subbasal annulus whitish; tarsus dark brown, with apex of segment I narrowly whitish. Mid and hind coxae dark brown; trochanters dark brown with yellowish spots; femora light brown with several small, short, longitudinal brown lines; apex of mid femur with

THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008

wide whitish annulus apically; mid tibia yellowish with a small dark brown spot at base and with a dark brown annulus apically; tarsus dark brown; apex of femur, tibia and tarsus of hind leg missing.

Structure. Body surface and pilosity. Body dull, membranous parts of fore wing slightly shining, iridescent. Head, thorax and abdomen densely covered with rather long, adpressed, pale pubescence; antennal segments I and II with very long and fine pilosity; longest hairs about 8 times as long as diameter of segment I; hairs on segment II gradually shortening towards apex; segments III and IV and apex of segment II with short, semierect pilosity; fore legs with dense, semierect pilosity with longer hairs on dorsal surface of tibia; hind legs with very short and dense, adpressed hairs.

Head ( Figs. 1–3 View Figs ) relatively short, about 1.15 times as long as width across eyes; anteocular part about 2.2 times as long as postocular; anterior lobe strongly declivent anteriorly, with a short and deep sulcus along meson before interocular furrow; posterior lobe strongly converging posteriorly in dorsal aspect, with a distinct longitudinal ridge; width across eyes about 3 times as wide as interocular distance; eyes very large, globose, reaching ventral outline of head in lateral aspect. Labium almost straight; visible segment III longest, about 1.65 times as long as visible segment II, visible segments I and II subequal in length; apex of visible segment I surpassing antenniferous tubercle, apex of visible segment II slightly surpassing middle of eye. Antenna long and gracile; segment I about 1.15 times as long as segment II.

Thorax. Pronotum ( Figs. 1–2 View Figs ) about 1.25 times as long as head, about 2.3 times as long as greatest width of anterior lobe; posterior lobe reduced, separated from anterior lobe by wide constriction, widely emarginated posteriorly. Prosternum very narrowly and shallowly excised posteriorly ( Fig. 6 View Figs ). Mesonotum about 1.5 times as long as wide, about 0.95 times as long as pronotum along meson, with a wide, shallow median furrow. Fore wing ( Fig. 5 View Figs ) reaching posterior margin of tergite VII.

Legs. Fore leg as in Fig. 1 View Figs ; coxa subcylindrical, slightly widening apically; trochanter ( Fig. 4 View Figs ) with a ventral projection much longer than wide at base and bearing a relatively short apical spine; femur rather long, about 1.6 times as long as coxa, armed ventrally with two series of rather uniform, long and slender spines inserted on very short, wart-like basal processes, intermixed with several shorter spines; spines of both series gradually shortening towards apex of femur; posteroventral series beginning near base of femur, composed of about 30 spiniferous processes; anteroventral series not interrupted at base, composed of about 35 spiniferous processes; tibia about 0.6 times as long as femur, straight, distinctly widened in its apical third, armed with a single series of about 23 long and slender spines inserted on very short, wart-like basal processes; tarsus about half as long as tibia, three-segmented; segment I longest, about 1.6 and 2.3 times as long as segments II and III, respectively; pretarsus with two claws, outer (posterior) claw distinctly shorter than inner (anterior) one. Mid and hind legs elongate and delicate; femora surpassing apex of abdomen.

Abdomen slender, about 1.3 times as long as head and thorax taken together, segment VII not projecting posteriorly.

Male genitalia. Pygophore ( Figs. 7–8 View Figs ) elongate, slightly flattened laterally, with a narrow, triangular superoposterior projection ( Figs. 9–10 View Figs ). Paramere ( Figs. 11–12 View Figs ) distinctly bent in dorsal view, apically approaching apex of superoposterior projection of pygophore in resting position ( Fig. 7 View Figs ). Phallus ( Figs. 13–17 View Figs ) slightly asymmetrical; phallobase largely membranous; phallosoma elongated, with a plate-like ventral sclerite and two short, asymmetrical, curved dorsal sclerotized processes ( Fig. 15 View Figs ); endosoma with numerous small, subequal toothlike processes. Articulatory apparatus connected to phallosoma at considerable distance of its base ( Fig. 13 View Figs ); basal plates slightly diverging apically ( Fig. 17 View Figs ), connected to phallosoma with a long, paired basal plate extension ( Fig. 16 View Figs ).

Measurements (in mm). – Body length 8.6. Length of head 1.08, preocular part 0.49, postocular part 0.22, width across eyes 0.93, interocular distance 0.31; lengths of antennal segments I, II, III and IV 10.9, 9.5, 2.05 and 1.74; length of (visible) labial segments I, II and III 0.34, 0.36 and 0.59. Length of pronotum along meson 1.36, greatest width of anterior lobe 0.59, of posterior lobe 0.71; length of mesonotum 1.27, greatest width 0.85, length of scutellum 0.31. Length of abdomen 9.8. Lengths of coxa, femur, tibia and tarsus (segments I, II and III) of fore leg 1.90, 3.04, 1.78, and 0.92 (0.51, 0.32 and 0.22), greatest widths of coxa and femur of fore leg 0.20 and 0.31; lengths of femur, tibia and tarsus of mid leg 9.2, 13.0 and 0.46.

Etymology. – It is a pleasure to dedicate this new species to Dr. Pieter H. van Doesburg, Jr., retired curator of Hemiptera at the Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum (Naturalis), Leiden, outstanding specialist of various groups of Heteroptera.

Comparative notes. – Eighteen species of Ploiaria have been recorded from the Oriental Region so far. One of them, P. greeni Distant, 1903 ( Sri Lanka) was described based on a nymph ( Bergroth, 1915); therefore, it was regarded as a species incertae sedis in subsequent works and its identity is still unknown. Fourteen of the remaining species (including the doubtful species P. nude Ravichandran & Livingstone, 1989 ) have unarmed fore trochanters. Most of these were originally placed to the genus Luteva Dohrn, 1860 (currently a junior synonym of Ploiaria ) and belong to a distinct speciesgroup. Species in this group have a glabrous fore trochanter and the fore femur is armed with only simple, subequal, short spines inserted on small, wart-like bases. The other three species occurring in the Oriental Region, P. anak Distant, 1909 ( India; Pakistan), P. insolida (White, 1877) (the Oriental and Pacific Regions) and P. macrophthalma (Dohrn, 1860) (tropicopolitan), have more or less conspicuous but always distinct spiniferous process(es) on the fore trochanter.

THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008

Ploiaria vandoesburgi , new species, can be distinguished from the other three Oriental species having a distinct spiniferous process(es) on the fore trochanter by the following key.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Reduviidae

Genus

Ploiaria

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF