Crocidura pseudorhoditis, Esselstyn & Achmadi & Handika & Swanson & Giarla & Rowe, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090.454.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7982B923-4CDC-44ED-A598-8651009DC7CC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5795526 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/980DF37A-D8F0-4DBF-877C-A11C04F55FC1 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:980DF37A-D8F0-4DBF-877C-A11C04F55FC1 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Crocidura pseudorhoditis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Crocidura pseudorhoditis , new species
LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:980DF37A-D8F0-4DBF-877C-A11C04F55FC1
Crocidura rhoditis Ruedi, 1995: 255 View in CoL . Misidentification.
11.5
Mt. Ambang
Crocidura rhoditis Esselstyn et al., 2019: 1716 View in CoL . Misidentification.
BREADTH 10.5
11 Sulawesi-wide
HOLOTYPE: MZB 43002 (= LSUMZ 39310), an adult female, collected on 22 February 2016 by H. Handika. The specimen was prepared as a cleaned skull and skeleton, study skin, stomach, intestine, and frozen tissues. External measurements from the type are 148 mm × 70 mm × 16 mm × 11 mm = 11 g. The voucher specimen and a tissue sample will be permanently curated at MZB, with another tissue sample retained at LSUMZ.
BRAINCASE 9.5 10
9 N = 5 N = 27 N =
35
N = 76 N = 10 N = 20 ralis
aust C.
pallida
C.
rhoditis
C.
pseudorhoditis
C.
SPECIES
TYPE LOCALITY: Indonesia; Sulawesi Utara; Bolaang Mondgondow, Passi Timur ; Insil; Mt. Ambang, near Lake Aliyah; 0.76385° N, 124.41188° E, 1481 m elevation.
GoogleMapsETYMOLOGY: We combine “pseudo” with “rhoditis” because this species looks very similar to C. rhoditis .
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION: We recorded this species from the northwestern portion of the west-central area of endemism (Mts. Torompupu and Rorekatimbo, Central Sulawesi Province), and the north-west and north-east areas of endemism of the northern peninsula ( fig. 20 View FIG ; Mt. Dako, Central Sulawesi Province; Mt. Buliohuto, Gorontalo Province; and Mt. Ambang, North Sulawesi Province). The absence of records from the north-central area of endemism is almost certainly due to the lack of general mammal surveys and specimens from this region. Both specimens we report from Mt. Rorekatimbo were trapped by Ruedi (1995); we did not collect any Crocidura pseudorhoditis on Mt. Rorekatimbo, despite working at similar elevations. We found this species at a range of elevations ( fig. 13 View FIG ), the low on Mt. Buliohuto (500 m) and the high on Mt. Rorekatimbo (2200 m; table 3 View TABLE 3 ).
DIAGNOSIS: Crocidura pseudorhoditis is a moderately large shrew ( tables 2 View TABLE 2 , 7 View TABLE 7 ) with a somewhat stocky build, medium gray, moderately bicolored pelage, a tail that is shorter than headand-body length, and dorsal foot surfaces that range from light gray-brown to pinkish white. The forefeet are paler than the hind feet and the claws are unpigmented and accompanied by a small tuft of white hairs on the hands, but on the hind feet, some of these hairs are dark. The tail is barely dorsoventrally bicolored proximally, but this transitions to a uniformly colored tail for the distal half of tail length. The tail has only sparse bristles over the proximal half of its length ( fig. 21C View FIG ). The lips are gray-brown, but the nose is distinctly paler. The palmar surface ranges from gray-brown to white, being palest on the digits. The color of the plantar surface also transitions from darker to paler colors toward the digits ( fig. 21C View FIG ), but all aspects are darker than on the forefeet. The skull is long ( table 7 View TABLE 7 ) and broader at the braincase and interorbital region than expected given its length ( figs. 10 View FIG , 22B View FIG ). The rostrum is long relative to the postpalatal portion of skull length, reflected in the RL/CIL ( fig. 10 View FIG ). The suture between the squamosal and parietal bones is often open and in the shape of a sickle blade just below the opening of the sinus canal ( fig. 22B View FIG ). The maxillary bridge is wide.
COMPARISONS: Crocidura pseudorhoditis is smaller than C. rhoditis , C. elongata , and C. quasielongata , but larger than C. caudipilosa, Rhoditis Group members C. australis and C. pallida , all members of the Small-Bodied Group, and all members of the Ordinary Group except C. nigripes , which is similarly sized ( fig. 19 View FIG ; tables 2 View TABLE 2 , 7 View TABLE 7 ). The body of C. pseudorhoditis is more robust than those of C. microelongata , C. australis , and C. pallida , but less stocky than in C. rhoditis and C. caudicrassa ( fig. 17 View FIG ). Crocidura pseudorhoditis is slightly darker (both pelage and feet) than C. rhoditis and tail bristles, though not abundant, are still more prevalent than in C. rhoditis ( fig. 21 View FIG ). The thenar and hypothenar pads on the hind foot are both more rounded than the oblong pads of C. rhoditis ( fig. 21 View FIG ). Crocidura pseudorhoditis is similar in pelage color to C. australis and C. pallida . Braincase breadth relative to skull length is greater than in many of the species with somewhat similar body sizes, including C. rhoditis , and all Elongata Subgroup and Thick-Tailed Group species. However, C. pallida is comparable in this regard, and C. australis has an even greater relative skull breadth no matter where it is measured ( fig. 10 View FIG ). The braincase is a bit more angular in C. pseudorhoditis than in C. rhoditis , with the widest part of the cranium in C. pseudorhoditis forming an obtuse point ( fig. 22 View FIG ). However, the angularity of the braincase does not reach the degree seen in C. nigripes . The ratio of rostral length to skull length is large in C. pseudorhoditis and exceeded only by that of C. rhoditis ; the other Rhoditis Group members have comparatively short relative rostral lengths (RL/CIL) and outside the Rhoditis Group, C. nigripes and the two Thick- Tailed species (defined below) are comparable ( fig. 10 View FIG ). Crocidura pseudorhoditis is larger in head-and-body length, foot length, and all cranial dimensions than C. australis and C. pallida ( fig. 19 View FIG ; tables 2 View TABLE 2 , 7 View TABLE 7 ). The slight difference in size between C. pseudorhoditis and C. rhoditis appears to be enhanced where the two species cooccur (Mt. Ambang; fig. 20 View FIG ), especially condyloincisive length ( fig. 23 View FIG ). A principal components analysis of 12 cranial measurements that only included these two species readily separated them on the first axis, which represents size ( fig. 19 View FIG ; table 6 View TABLE 6 ).
COMMENTS: While Crocidura pseudorhoditis is on average smaller than C. rhoditis , the two species are easily confused phenotypically and they occur in sympatry in the north-east area of endemism ( fig. 20 View FIG ; table 3 View TABLE 3 ). The large mitochondrial distances between C. rhoditis and C. pseudorhoditis , along with the slight but consistent differences in size, which appear to be enhanced where they are syntopic ( fig. 23 View FIG ), strongly suggest these are independently evolving populations. Our BPP analyses tested species limits with an alignment that contains 15 C. rhoditis and 58 C. pseudorhoditis and is 96% complete. The analyses supported these species’ distinction with 1.0 posterior probability with all prior combinations in all runs.
One of the few cases of clarity from our phylogenetic analyses is the consistent and well-supported sister relationship between Crocidura rhoditis and C. pseudorhoditis ( figs. 4 View FIG , 5 View FIG , 7 View FIG , 8 View FIG ; supplementary data S6). Given their phenotypic similarity, this makes sense from a morphological perspective. In our UCE species tree, we found these two species sister to C. elongata ( fig. 7 View FIG ).
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Mt. Ambang ( LSUMZ 39030 , 39031 , 39034–39036 , 39039–39043 , 39045 , 39048 , 39049 , 39051 , 39052 , 39056 , 39059 , 39060 , 39063 , 39066 , 39067 , 39278 , 39280–39283 , 39293 , 39297 , 39298 , 39300– 39309 , 39311–39314 , 39316 , 39317 , 39322 ; MZB 43002 ; NMV C37985 , C37992 , C37996 , C38017 ), Mt. Buliohuto ( LSUMZ 38275–38278 View Materials , 38284 View Materials ; NMV C37793 ), Mt. Dako ( LSUMZ 36973 View Materials , 36978 View Materials , 36979 View Materials , 36986 View Materials , 36990 View Materials , 36991 View Materials , 36993 View Materials , 36995 View Materials , 36998 View Materials , 37000 View Materials , 37002 View Materials , 37005 View Materials , 37007 View Materials , 37008 View Materials , 37011–37016 View Materials , 37033 View Materials , 37034 View Materials ; MZB 38564–38566 View Materials ; NMV C37252 , C37254 , C37264 , C37268 , C37292 , C37297 , 37308 , 37315 , C37328 , 37329 , C37363 , C37367 ), Mt. Torompupu (NMV C40308), Mt. Rorekatimbo ( RMNH 38409 About RMNH (= IZEA 4406 ), IZEA 4407 ) .
LSUMZ |
Louisiana State University, Musuem of Zoology |
N |
Nanjing University |
C |
University of Copenhagen |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Crocidura pseudorhoditis
Esselstyn, Jacob A., Achmadi, Anang S., Handika, Heru, Swanson, Mark T., Giarla, Thomas C. & Rowe, Kevin C. 2021 |
Crocidura rhoditis
Esselstyn, J. A. & A. S. Achmadi & H. Handika & T. C. Giarla & K. C. Rowe 2019: 1716 |
Crocidura rhoditis
Ruedi, M. 1995: 255 |