Pseudocanthon Bates, 1887
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5027.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D8FE51C2-C34F-47CE-87FC-80BAB16C54BD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5492694 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038A87A7-FFFE-FFAB-71F5-FB26BCEB19C2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pseudocanthon Bates, 1887 |
status |
|
Pseudocanthon Bates, 1887 View in CoL
Pseudocanthon Bates, 1887: 35 View in CoL (original description); Bates 1889: 386 (redescription); Gillet 1911: 27 (as junior synonym of Canthon View in CoL ); Lucas 1920: 548 (catalogue); Islas 1942: 333 (cited as a synonym of Canthon View in CoL ); Blackwelder 1944: 198 (as junior synonym of Canthon View in CoL ; checklist); Martínez 1947: 263–264 (taxonomic remarks); Pereira & Martínez 1956: 95, 109, 184 (catalogue, distribution, and identification key); Martínez 1959: 57–58 (catalogue, distribution, and taxonomic remarks); Halffter 1961: 231–233 (identification key and taxonomic remarks); Vulcano & Pereira 1964: 591 (catalogue); Halffter & Matthews 1966: 261 (checklist and distribution); Matthews 1966: 83–85 (catalogue, description, distribution, and taxonomic remarks); Vulcano & Pereira 1967: 551 (identification key); Halffter & Martínez 1977: 35, 45, 60, 62 (checklist, identification key, and taxonomic remarks); Howden & Young 1981: 35 (diagnosis); Halffter & Edmonds 1982: 139 (checklist and distribution); Medina & Lopera-Toro 2000: 301, 311 (checklist and identification key); Vazde-Mello 2000: 194 (checklist); Ratcliffe 2002: 13 (checklist); Medina et al. 2003: 41 (remarks about the diagnosis of Pseudocanthon View in CoL ); Medina & Pulido 2009: 56, 59 (checklist); Smith 2009: 40 (checklist); Vaz-de-Mello et al. 2011: 6, 11, 18, 26, 33, 41, 45, fig. 149 (identification key); Carvajal et al. 2011: 99, 119, 314 (checklist, description, and distribution); Solís & Kohlmann 2012: 2, 4 (checklist); Boilly & Vaz-de-Mello 2013: 107 (identification key); Tarasov & Dimitrov 2016: 15 (new concept for Deltochilini); Tissiani et al. 2017: 414 (identification key); Cupello & Vaz-de-Mello 2018: 12, 13, 17, 18, 20, 32, 35, 36, 37, 39, 173 (taxonomic remarks); Chamorro et al. 2018: 76 (identification key); Schoolmeesters 2020 (catalogue); Vaz-de-Mello 2020 (checklist).
Canthon (Pseudocanthon) : Krajcik 2006: 25 (checklist); Krajcik 2012: 63 (checklist).
Opiocanthon Paulian, 1947: 29–30 View in CoL (distribution, identification key, original description, and taxonomic remarks); Matthews 1966: 85 (subjective synonymy of Opiocanthon View in CoL with Pseudocanthon View in CoL ); Ratcliffe 2002: 13 (cited as a synonym of Pseudocanthon View in CoL ); Smith 2009: 40 (cited as a synonym of Pseudocanthon View in CoL ); Solís & Kohlmann 2012: 4 (cited as a synonym of Pseudocanthon View in CoL ); Peck et al. 2014: 43 (cited as a synonym of Pseudocanthon View in CoL ); Cupello & Vaz-de-Mello 2018: 18 (cited as a synonym of Pseudocanthon View in CoL ).
Type species. Pseudocanthon View in CoL : Canthon perplexus LeConte, 1847 View in CoL by monotypy. Opiocanthon View in CoL : Canthon vitraci Fleutiaux & Sallé, 1889 View in CoL , by original designation.
Diagnosis. Within Deltochilini (sensu Tarasov & Dimitrov 2016), Pseudocanthon is diagnosed by the following combination of characters. Small body (3–6 mm), elongate and flat dorsoventrally. Clypeus quadridentate, with medial teeth larger than lateral teeth. Base of clypeal teeth covered by a single row of short setae extending almost to paraocular area (gena). Lateral edges of pronotum nearly straight and subparalell ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ). Elytra surface with minute setae ( Fig. 1D View FIGURE 1 ). Anterior portion of hypomera strongly excavate, posteriorly delimited by a transversal carina ( Fig. 1E View FIGURE 1 ). Tarsal claws angulate at base.
Taxonomic remarks. Pseudocanthon can be easily confused with Sylvicanthon in Deltochilini (sensu Tarasov & Dimitrov 2016). These taxa share the hypomera anteriorly excavated and divided by a transversal carina ( Fig. 1E View FIGURE 1 ), and tarsal claws angulated basally. However, Pseudocanthon can be easily distinguished from Sylvicanthon by the elongate general shape of the body; clypeus with four acute teeth, covered basally by a single row of short setae almost reaching the gena; lateral edges of pronotum nearly straight and subparallel ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ); and elytra surface coated with minute setae ( Fig. 1D View FIGURE 1 ). On the other hand, specimens of Sylvicanthon have an oval body; two or four clypeal teeth, with a row of setae limited to the base of the teeth; lateral edges of pronotum angulate at medial portion ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ); and smooth elytral surface ( Fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 ).
Redescription. Body black or brown with metallic reflections. Orange or red spots on different parts of the body, varying between species. Orange or black legs. Length. 3–6 mm. Head. Surface with well-impressed and dense granulation. Foveolate punctures spaced by approximately once to twice their diameter. Clypeus with four acute teeth. Medial teeth larger than lateral teeth. Base of clypeal teeth covered by a single row of short setae extending almost to paraocular area. Edge between clypeogenal suture and clypeal teeth substraight. Edge of paraocular area curved outward, with rudimentary tooth after junction with the clypeus. Interocular width approximately five times width of eye in dorsal view. Thorax. Surface of pronotum granulate ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ), or with inconspicuous granulation ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ). Lateral edges and anterior angle of pronotum with imbricate microsculpture. Foveolate punctures of pronotum spaced by approximately two to three times their diameter. Anterior angles acute, directed forward. Posterior edge of pronotum without margin. Hypomera divided into two parts by a transversal carina ( Fig. 1E View FIGURE 1 ). Anterior portion of hypomera excavate ( Fig. 1E View FIGURE 1 ), with imbricate microsculpture, and setae near to transversal carina. Integument punctation of prosternum inconspicuous, only visible at high magnification. Posterior edge with row of setae. Mesoventrite with dense and well-impressed granulation. Mesoventrite approximately five to eight times wider than long. Meso-metaventral suture straight or lightly arched. Metaventrite with granulate microsculpture conspicuous at anterior and posterior portions; visible only in some species at central portion. Imbricate microsculpture at anterior portion and lateral edges. Foveolate punctures of metaventrite spaced by approximately once or twice their diameter at anterior and posterior portions; lateral edges with eliptical foveolate punctures almost confluent. Mesepimeron and metanepisternum with imbricate microsculpture. Elytra. Surface with dense and well-impressed granulation. Interstriae with setigerous foveolate punctures spaced by approximately two to three times their diameter. Lateral edge arched. Striae well impressed ( Fig. 1D View FIGURE 1 ). Fifth stria closer to sixth than to fourth stria. Seventh stria discontinuous at base. Eighth stria absent ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ) or reduced to basal fourth of elytra, or extending to approximately the anterior half of elytra ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ). Epipleuron with imbricate microsculpture. Abdomen. Pygidium rounded apically ( Fig. 2G–H View FIGURE 2 ). Base with small tubercle at central portion. Pygidium and propygidium not separated by carina. Surface of pygidium densely granulate and well impressed; foveolate punctures spaced by approximately five times their diameter. Surface of ventrites with dense and well-impressed granulation; foveolate punctures shallow. Legs. Tibiae and femora with granulate microsculpture and foveolate punctures. Protibia with three lateral teeth, and two longitudinal carinae with row of setae in dorsal and ventral views. Margin of metafemur discontinuous at anterior edge. Mesotibiae and metatibiae smoothly arched. Mesotarsomeres and metatarsomeres 1–4 subtriangular, the apical subrectangular. Tarsal claws angulate basally. Secondary sexual characters. Males with protibial spur bifid at apex; females with spiniform spur. Furthermore, females have the sixth abdominal ventrite evenly wide while in males this ventrite is narrower at the middle. Tegmen. Parameres symmetrical, curved at apex, with spiniform projection, or truncate ( Fig. 5A–F View FIGURE 5 ). Endophallus. Lacking lamella copulatrix (LC). Superior right peripheral (SRP) endophallite circular shaped, with expanded handle at distal part ( Fig. 6E–F View FIGURE 6 ). Frontolateral peripheral (FLP) endophallite elongate and sinuous ( Fig. 6E–F View FIGURE 6 ). Complex of axial and subaxial (A+SA) endophallites elongate and irregular ( Fig. 6E–F View FIGURE 6 ). Some species have a small and I-shaped accessory endophallite (AE) near the anterior portion of A+SA ( Fig. 6A, D–F View FIGURE 6 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Pseudocanthon Bates, 1887
Nazaré-Silva, Everton E. & Silva, Fernando A. B. 2021 |
Canthon (Pseudocanthon)
Krajcik, M. 2012: 63 |
Krajcik, M. 2006: 25 |
Opiocanthon
Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z. & Cupello, M. 2018: 18 |
Peck, S. & Thomas, M. & Turnbow, R. 2014: 43 |
Solis, A. & Kohlmann, B. 2012: 4 |
Smith, A. B. T. 2009: 40 |
Ratcliffe, B. 2002: 13 |
Matthews, E. 1966: 85 |
Paulian, R. 1947: 30 |
Pseudocanthon
Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z. & Cupello, M. 2018: 12 |
Chamorro, W. & Marin-Armijos, D. & Granda, V. & Vaz-de-Mello, F. 2018: 76 |
Tissiani, A. & Vaz-de-Mello, F. & Campelo-Junior, J. 2017: 414 |
Tarasov, S. & Dimitrov, D. 2016: 15 |
Boilly, O. & Vaz-de-Mello, F. 2013: 107 |
Solis, A. & Kohlmann, B. 2012: 2 |
Vaz-de-Mello, F. & Edmonds, W. & Ocampo, F. & Schoolmeesters, P. 2011: 6 |
Carvajal, V. & Villamarin, S. & Ortega, A. 2011: 99 |
Medina, C. & Pulido, L. 2009: 56 |
Smith, A. B. T. 2009: 40 |
Medina, C. & Scholtz, C. & Gill, B. 2003: 41 |
Ratcliffe, B. 2002: 13 |
Medina, C. & Lopera-Toro, A. 2000: 301 |
Halffter, G. & Edmonds, W. 1982: 139 |
Howden, Y. & Young, O. P. 1981: 35 |
Halffter, G. & Martinez, A. 1977: 35 |
Vulcano, M. & Pereira, F. 1967: 551 |
Halffter, G. & Matthews, E. 1966: 261 |
Matthews, E. 1966: 83 |
Vulcano, M. & Pereira, F. 1964: 591 |
Halffter, G. 1961: 231 |
Martinez, A. 1959: 57 |
Pereira, F. & Martinez, A. 1956: 95 |
Martinez, A. 1947: 263 |
Blackwelder, R. 1944: 198 |
Islas, F. 1942: 333 |
Lucas, R. 1920: 548 |
Gillet, J. J. E. 1911: 27 |
Bates, H. W. 1889: 386 |
Bates, H. W. 1887: 35 |