Glomeremus tikasignatus, Hugel & Micheneau & Fournel & Warren & Gauvin-Bialecki & Pailler & Chase & Strasberg, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.2545.1.6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5310667 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0389AA7B-FFFF-1415-09A2-F919FB63FE8D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Glomeremus tikasignatus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Glomeremus tikasignatus View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs. 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 View FIGURES 2–21 , tab. 3)
Holotype. Male. Indian Ocean, Mascarene archipelago, Maurice, Savanne District, Parc National de Rivière Noire, Plaine Champagne , point de vue sur les Gorges , 681 m alt., 20°25’39’’S 57°25’43’’E, 22.IV.2005. S. Hugel, MNHN ( MNHN-ENSIF2646 ). GoogleMaps
Allotype. Female. Same as holotype, 13.VIII.2001. S. Hugel, MNHN ( MNHN-ENSIF2647 ).
Paratypes. Males. 2♂, Maurice, Savanne District, Parc National de Rivière Noire, Cocotte, 745 m Alt. , 20°26’29’’S 57°28’20’’E, 22.II.2008, BIOTAS2008210, S. Hugel leg & coll.; 07.V.2009, BIOTAS2009163, S. Hugel leg & coll. Females. 1♀, Maurice, Black River District, Parc National de Rivière Noire, Piton Brise Fer , 617 m alt ., 20°23’02’’S 57°25’51’’E, 13.V.2009, BIOTAS2009286, S. Hugel, MSIRI. 5♀, Maurice, Savanne District, Parc National de Rivière Noire, Cocotte, 745 m Alt. GoogleMaps , 20°26’29’’S 57°28’20’’E, 22.II.2008, BIOTAS2008211, S. Hugel leg & coll.; 06.III.2008, BIOTAS2008412, S. Hugel leg & coll.; 22.IV.2005, S. Hugel leg & coll.; 22.IV.2005, S. Hugel , CIRAD Réunion ; 19.IV.2005, S. Hugel leg & coll.
Diagnosis. This species differs from the other Glomeremus in the following characters: TI and TII with 4 ventral subapical spurs on both sides, in addition to the apical spur (3 in G.shelfordi ); FW reduced, but clearly distinct (all other Glomeremus species are wingless except G. orchidophilus n. sp., G. paraorchidophilus n. sp., G. mediopictus Uvarov, 1957 , and G. feanus (Griffini, 1908)) ; the thorax and head without black pattern; male cerci not particularly extended (extended and thin in G. brevifalcatus ); male tergite X sclerites forming an upwards directed lamellar process ( Fig. 12, 15 View FIGURES 2–21 ); male SGP with a shallow emargination ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 2–21 ); female SGP with a “W”-shaped end margin ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 2–21 ); ovipositor falciform, pointing apically, as long as FIII, dorsal valves without ventrally directed protrusion ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 2–21 ; ovipositor roughly straight after the base in G. feanus , G. glomerinus , G.sphinx , G. mediopictus , G. pileatus , G. shelfordi , G. sphingoides ).
Description. In addition to generic characters. Body length: size medium to large for the genus. Head ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 2–21 ): as broad or slightly broader than the thorax; fastigium frontis wider than scapus; median and lateral ocelli clearly distinct (less obvious on specimens dried from alcohol), median ocellus circular, less wide than scapus.
Thorax. Pronotum: maximal width (including lateral lobes) as wide as or slightly wider than long; anterior margin convex (in dorsal view), arched; posterior margin strait (in dorsal view), almost horizontal; anterior sulcus deep on lateral lobes and well distinct on discus; posterior sulcus shallower and less distinct on discus; both sulci converging on lateral lobes; prozona elevated. Wings. FW well distinct, half as long as Pro. Legs. TI and TII with usual spurs formula (4 pairs of subapical + 1 pair of apical spurs ventrally, and one single apical spur on TII posterior dorsal angle); subapical spurs of usual length (at least as long as T width). Hind legs: femora 3.4–3.7 times as long as wide ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 2–21 ); FIII with 5–7 ventral anterior spines; FIII with 6–11 ventral posterior spines; TIII with 5–7 dorsal anterior spines; with 6–8 dorsal posterior spines. Abdomen. Stridulatory files present.
Sexual dimorphism: apart from primary sexual characters, ♂♂ and ♀♀ are similar.
Male: terminalia ( Fig. 9, 12, 15 View FIGURES 2–21 ). Tergite VIII slightly extended posteriorly (compared to preceding tergites); posterior margin forming a 45° angle (in side view). Tergite IX vertically oriented (side view); distal end of tergite pointing ventrally (side view) with a shallow emargination separating two small bulges (ventral/ posterior view; Fig. 15 View FIGURES 2–21 ). TX sclerites (see Hugel, 2009) forming an upwards directed lamellar process ( Fig. 12, 15 View FIGURES 2–21 ). Cerci not particularly elongated ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 2–21 ). SGP distal end with an indistinct emargination ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 2–21 ); styli exceeding distinctly the SGP distal end, not thickened ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 2–21 ). Female: sternite before SGP (VII) not modified; SGP ( Figs. 18, 21 View FIGURES 2–21 ) with strait lateral margins, posterior margin pointing ventrally (side view, Fig. 18 View FIGURES 2–21 ), the posterior end corresponds to the SGP dorsal surface, with a shallow “W” shape (ventral view, Fig. 21 View FIGURES 2–21 ). Ovipositor regularly arched, pointing distally, as long as FIII, dorsal valves without ventrally directed protrusion.
Colour: general coloration brown; head, legs pronotum without black pattern (knees sometimes darkened); anterior part of abdominal tergites darkened; median and lateral ocelli white.
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |