Discozantaena
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.171035 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6265690 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038987BF-FFB3-FFD0-FEB7-109B1C37FD5E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Discozantaena |
status |
|
Key to Species of Discozantaena View in CoL
1. Elytral margin not widely explanate; clypeus not widened laterally, not shelflike ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 ) ............................................................................................................ sequentia View in CoL n. sp.
Elytral margin widely explanate; clypeus widened at anterior angles, shelflike ......... 2
2. Anterior margin of clypeus straight............................................................................... 3
Anterior margin of clypeus emarginate......................................................................... 5
3. Pronotal disc with granules much denser in impressions than on shining relief ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ) ................................................................................................ drakensbergensis View in CoL n. sp.
Pronotal discal relief more markedly granulate ............................................................ 4
4. Body form broader, pronotum width/length ratio ca. 1.90 ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ). .......... ovata View in CoL n. sp.
Body form less broad, pronotum width/length ratio ca 1.76 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 )... endroedyi View in CoL n. sp.
5. Sides of pronotum straight ........................................................................................... 6
Sides of pronotum arcuate............................................................................................. 8
6. Pronotum on each side with large, moderately convex nongranulate area ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ) ...... ................................................................................................................. tibiovela View in CoL n. sp.
Pronotum on each side more uniformly granulate ........................................................ 7
7. Pronotum more transverse, width/length ratio ca. 1.79; body smaller, length ca. 1.71 mm; explanate margin of elytra narrower ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ) .............................. brevicollis View in CoL n. sp.
Pronotum less transverse, width/length ratio ca. 1.90; body larger, length ca. 2.05 mm; explanate margin of elytra very wide ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 )............................................. galea View in CoL n. sp.
8. Frons disc with granules absent or very fine and very sparse; body larger, length ca. 2.03 mm ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 )........................................................................................ karroo View in CoL n. sp.
Frons disc with distinct granules; body smaller, length ca. 1.80 mm or less ................ 9
9. Elytra shorter, elytra length/pronotum length ratio ca. 2.44; elytra very acuminate posteriorly and markedly peaked at suture ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ) ...................................... sepiola View in CoL n. sp.
Elytra longer, elytra length/pronotum length ratio ca. 2.70 or greater; elytra not markedly acuminate posteriorly, less peaked at suture ...................................................... 10
10. Elytral humeri present; aedeagus as illustrated ( Figs. 4 View FIGURE 4 , 15 View FIGURE 15 ) .......................................... ...................................................................... genuvela Perkins and BalfourBrowne View in CoL
Elytral humeri absent; aedeagus as illustrated ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 , 21 View FIGURE 21 ).................... leleupi View in CoL n. sp.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |