Discozantaena

Perkins, Philip D., 2005, A revision of the South African endemic humicolous beetle genus Discozantaena Perkins and Balfour­Browne (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae), Zootaxa 915, pp. 1-48 : 6-7

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.171035

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6265690

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038987BF-FFB3-FFD0-FEB7-109B1C37FD5E

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Discozantaena
status

 

Key to Species of Discozantaena View in CoL

1. Elytral margin not widely explanate; clypeus not widened laterally, not shelf­like ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 ) ............................................................................................................ sequentia View in CoL n. sp.

­ Elytral margin widely explanate; clypeus widened at anterior angles, shelf­like ......... 2

2. Anterior margin of clypeus straight............................................................................... 3

­ Anterior margin of clypeus emarginate......................................................................... 5

3. Pronotal disc with granules much denser in impressions than on shining relief ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ) ................................................................................................ drakensbergensis View in CoL n. sp.

­ Pronotal discal relief more markedly granulate ............................................................ 4

4. Body form broader, pronotum width/length ratio ca. 1.90 ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ). .......... ovata View in CoL n. sp.

­ Body form less broad, pronotum width/length ratio ca 1.76 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 )... endroedyi View in CoL n. sp.

5. Sides of pronotum straight ........................................................................................... 6

­ Sides of pronotum arcuate............................................................................................. 8

6. Pronotum on each side with large, moderately convex non­granulate area ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ) ...... ................................................................................................................. tibiovela View in CoL n. sp.

­ Pronotum on each side more uniformly granulate ........................................................ 7

7. Pronotum more transverse, width/length ratio ca. 1.79; body smaller, length ca. 1.71 mm; explanate margin of elytra narrower ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ) .............................. brevicollis View in CoL n. sp.

­ Pronotum less transverse, width/length ratio ca. 1.90; body larger, length ca. 2.05 mm; explanate margin of elytra very wide ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 )............................................. galea View in CoL n. sp.

8. Frons disc with granules absent or very fine and very sparse; body larger, length ca. 2.03 mm ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 )........................................................................................ karroo View in CoL n. sp.

­ Frons disc with distinct granules; body smaller, length ca. 1.80 mm or less ................ 9

9. Elytra shorter, elytra length/pronotum length ratio ca. 2.44; elytra very acuminate posteriorly and markedly peaked at suture ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ) ...................................... sepiola View in CoL n. sp.

­ Elytra longer, elytra length/pronotum length ratio ca. 2.70 or greater; elytra not markedly acuminate posteriorly, less peaked at suture ...................................................... 10

10. Elytral humeri present; aedeagus as illustrated ( Figs. 4 View FIGURE 4 , 15 View FIGURE 15 ) .......................................... ...................................................................... genuvela Perkins and Balfour­Browne View in CoL

­ Elytral humeri absent; aedeagus as illustrated ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 , 21 View FIGURE 21 ).................... leleupi View in CoL n. sp.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Hydraenidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF