Prionospio (Minuspio)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.206763 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6194577 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03897F61-C908-FFA2-6AEF-FC1A14A4FE0A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Prionospio (Minuspio) |
status |
|
Key to the species of the subgenus Prionospio (Minuspio) View in CoL
1. With three or four pairs of branchiae...................................................................... 2
- With more than four pairs of branchiae..................................................................... 6
2. Branchiae present from chaetiger 3..................................... Prionospio (Minuspio) pilkena Wilson, 1990 View in CoL
- Branchiae present from chaetiger 2........................................................................ 3
3. With dorsal flaps on chaetigers 5–13............................................ P. (M.) laciniosa Maciolek, 1985 View in CoL
- Without a dorsal flap................................................................................... 4
4. Some branchia distinctly wrinkled.............................................. P. (M.) fauchaldi Maciolek, 1985 View in CoL
- All branchiae smooth, not wrinkled...................................................................... 5
5. With dorsal crests........................................................... P. (M.) elegantula Imajima, 1990 View in CoL
- Without dorsal crests............................................................ P. (M.) japonica Okuda, 1935 View in CoL
6. 39 pairs of branchiae....................................................... P. (M.) polybranchiata Fauvel, 1929 View in CoL
- Fewer than 39 pairs of branchiae......................................................................... 7
7. Interparapodial pouches present.................................................... P. (M.) aluta Maciolek, 1985 View in CoL
- Interparapodial pouches absent........................................................................... 8
8. Ventral sabre chaeta absent.................................................... P. (M.) perkinsi Maciolek, 1985 View in CoL
– Ventral sabre chaeta present............................................................................. 9
9. Some branchia distinctly longer than (minimally 4–5 times) notopodial lamellae................................... 10
- All branchiae short, nearly as long as notopodial lamellae..................................................... 15
10. Prostomium with peaks............................................................................... 11
- Prostomium without peaks............................................................................. 14
11. Anterior part of prostomium truncated, with a small medial peak.......................... P. (M.) delta Hartman, 1965 View in CoL
- Anterior part of prostomium rounded, with 3–5 peaks....................................................... 12
12. Eyes absent...................................................................... P. (M.) anatolica View in CoL sp. nov.
- Two pairs of eyes.................................................................................... 13
13. Dorsal crests absent............................................................. P. (M.) lighti Maciolek, 1985 View in CoL
- Dorsal crests present........................................................... P. (M.) pulchra Imajima, 1990 View in CoL
14. Branchiae longest on chaetiger 2, prostomium widest at mid–point......................... P. (M.) tatura Wilson, 1990 View in CoL
- Branchiae longest on chaetigers 4–5, prostomium widest at posterior most region.............. P. (M.) yuriel Wilson, 1990 View in CoL
15. Notopodial lamellae lacking on chaetiger 1................................................................ 16
- Notopodial lamellae more or less well–developed on chaetiger 1............................................... 19
16. Dorsal crests absent......................................................... P. (M.) patagonica Augener, 1923 View in CoL
- Dorsal crests present................................................................................. 17
17. Without prostomial peaks......................................................... P. (M.) maciolekae View in CoL sp. nov.
- With prostomial peaks................................................................................. 18
18. Anterior margin of prostomium truncated and with only a small peak..................... P. (M.) wireni Maciolek, 1985 View in CoL
- Anterior margin of prostomium rounded and with five small peaks............... P. (M.) multibranchiata Berkeley, 1927 View in CoL
19. More than 10 pairs of branchiae........................................................................ 20
- Fewer than 10 pairs of branchiae....................................................................... 21
20. Dorsal crests absent.............................................................. P. (M.) wambri Wilson, 1990
- Dorsal crests present.......................................................... P. (M.) elongata Imajima, 1990 View in CoL
21. Eyes absent, branchiae wrinkled................................................ P. (M.) sandersi Maciolek, 1981b View in CoL
- One or two pairs eyes present, branchiae narrow and cylindrical.......................... P. (M.) cirrifera Wirén, 1883 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.