Amblyothele Simon, 1910
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.16.233 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AC717D1B-B74E-4C1D-86D8-0F3030C3C4F9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3791834 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0389215E-FF80-FF87-E6D7-FF13EFF5FA33 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Amblyothele Simon, 1910 |
status |
|
Amblyothele Simon, 1910 View in CoL
Amblyothele Simon, 1910 View in CoL . Type species, Amblyothele albocincta Simon, 1910 View in CoL , by original designation.
Small wolf spiders (males 3.08-4.17, females 3.33-5.17) without pronounced carapace pattern, sometimes with pale median band and darker striae radiating from fovea ( Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ). Anterior eye row ( Fig. 2 View Figures 2-9 ) usually either straight or, more often, recurved, with AME ranging in size from equal to twice diameter of ALE. PME 1.40- 2.25 times diameter apart; PLE 0.66-0.86 times diameter of ALE. Eye region normally suffused with black. Chelicerae pale, mottled or streaked with grey, clothed in long dark setae; posterior margin with two teeth, proximal one normally larger, anterior margin normally with three minute teeth with middle one largest although in some species anterior margin lacks teeth altogether. Labia and maxillae coloured as chelicerae with maxillae 1.75 to 2.0 times longer than labium. Sternum pale, scutiform, moderately to strongly produced between hind coxae, with scattering of dark setae. Legs pale yellow to pale brown, clothed in short adpressed setae, noticeably longer and thinner than those of all other well-characterised piratine genera, with length/width ratio of femur I ranging from 5.60 to 10.50. Leg IV 1.25-1.35 times length of leg I. Ventral spines of leg I normally with three pairs on tibia and three on metatarsus, distal pairs normally reduced in size. All leg spines long, thin and pale. Tarsi with three claws ( Fig. 9 View Figures 2-9 ); paired claws with two to five long thin teeth and few tiny ones at base; unpaired claw small on raised pad, with four or five small teeth, having two long serrated bristles adjacent. Tarsal organ with keyhole shaped aperture ( Fig. 8 View Figures 2-9 ). Abdomen pale yellow to brown, sometimes suffused with grey and usually with paler dorsal folium ( Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ). Type species, A. albocincta , with row of four paired pale white spots on dorsal surface. Abdomen of males without dorsal scutum. Dorsal surface sometimes clothed in dark hairs. Ventrally pale yellow to white. Spinnerets long, ALS twice length of AMS, clearly 3 segmented ( Figs 1 View Figure 1 , 4, 5 View Figures 2-9 ). Dorsally pale to dark brown or grey, ventrally pale white or cream. ALS in female with two major ampullate gland spigots near median margin, surrounded by numerous piriform gland spigots. PLS with numerous aciniform gland spigots.
Male palp longer and narrower than that of most piratine genera and cymbium without terminal claws. MA located distally on bulb, very large U or C-shaped sclerite with two branches ( Figs 6, 7 View Figures 2-9 , 10 View Figures 10-13 , 14 View Figures 14-15. 14 ); larger, anterior branch directed antero-mesally, blade-shaped. Smaller posterior branch directed anteriorly, variable in shape: blunt lobe with rounded tip in A. albocincta , abruptly truncate in A. togona and A. longipes , pointed barb in A. hamatula . Course of E almost totally obscured by MA in unexpanded palp ( Figs 6, 7 View Figures 2-9 ) with only very tip visible near base of MA in A. albocincta , A. latedissipata and A. togona . Sub-tegulum relatively large in most species, occupying from quarter to third of surface of bulb, but reduced in size in A. hamatula .
Female epigyne resembling that of other piratine genera in being simple plate ( Fig. 3 View Figures 2-9 ), often obscured by densely packed, long, barbed setae. Epigynal plate suboval in shape, shallowly ( A. latedissipata ) to deeply ( A. togona ) notched on posterior border. Spermathecae and their ducts visible to greater or lesser extent through lateral margins of epigynal plate. Viewed internally, genital openings visible to either side of central notch on posterior margin of epigyne with spermathecal ducts extending anteriorly, either straight or curving mesally. Spermathecae relatively small, either spherical or pyriform. With two small laterally-oriented glands at base of spermathecal ducts, near the posterior margin of the epigynal plate; gland ducts connect to spermathecal ducts.
Diagnosis of Amblyothele Simon, 1910
Pirata , the nominate genus of the subfamily, is distributed throughout the world with the exception of SE Asia(?), Australia and the Pacific region. The tegular apophysis in Pirata varies widely in form (see, for example Almquist (2005) for European species, Tanaka (1988) for those of Japan and Wallace (1978) for Nearctic species). The tegular apophysis in Amblyothele resembles that of some species of Pirata (e.g., P. latitans (Blackwall, 1841) , P. insularis Emerton, 1885 , Pirata uliginosus (Thorell, 1856) and among European species (see Almquist 2005, figs. 236 a-h, 237 a-e) but not that of the type species, P. piraticus (Clerck, 1757) . The epigynes of Amblyothele species also resemble those of Pirata species but in several species have a conspicuous notch on the posterior margin. Despite the similarity of the male palp in at least some Pirata species and Amblyothele , the two genera differ significantly in somatic characters. The legs of Amblyothele are much longer and thinner than those of Pirata species with the length/width ratio of Femur I of three Pirata species ranging from 3.21 to 3.33 and that for three Amblyothele species from 5.67 to 10.45. Furthermore, the legs of Pirata species are more or less densely clothed in semi-erect setae while those of Amblyothele species have only a sparse clothing of short, adpressed setae. Overall, most Amblyothele species are smaller than Pirata species although the smallest Pirata (e.g. P. latitans ) overlap in size with the largest Amblyothele .
In the palp of the genera Proevippa , Trabea and Pterartoria , the basal part of the tegulum bears one or more, more or less translucent, poorly sclerotised membranous extensions (see Fig. 10b View Figures 10-13 in Russell-Smith 1981 and Fig. 1a View Figure 1 in Russell-Smith 1982) which are lacking in Amblyothele . Furthermore, the terminal apophysis in Proevippa Purcell, 1903 and Trabea Simon, 1876 is much larger than that in Amblyothele and has a characteristic tongue-shaped form with a sharply reflexed distal portion ( Russell-Smith 1981, 1982).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Amblyothele Simon, 1910
Russell-Smith, Tony, Jocqué, Rudy & Alderweireldt, Mark 2009 |
Amblyothele
Simon 1910 |
Amblyothele albocincta
Simon 1910 |