Eponides de Montfort 1808
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4215.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B91D1782-C11A-4CDC-96B6-76104FEE51BD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6067844 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0389064B-FFAA-3D3E-3EEE-E229FD57BDE7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eponides de Montfort 1808 |
status |
|
Eponides de Montfort 1808 View in CoL
Eponides View in CoL sp. cf. E. repandus ( Fichtel & Moll 1798) View in CoL ( Fig. 19 View FIGURE 19 :7–10)
Description. Test trochospiral, evolute on spiral side and involute on umbilical, unequally biconvex. Periphery smooth, slightly lobulate around weakly inflated chambers with a thin carina. Chambers crescent shaped on spiral side and subtriangular on umbilical side. Sutures radial, curved and depressed on umbilical side, raised on spiral side. Interiosutural area finely perforate to smooth. Clustered pustular ornament occasionally present on initial chambers on both sides of test. Outer edge of final chamber on umbilical side of test extended to form a thin, apertural face pitted with areal apertures.
Remarks. These specimens are only tentatively assigned to Eponides repandus (Fichtel & Moll 1978) due to the highly damaged nature of the available material however, the distinct features of this species, including the areal apertures on the umbilical side of the test, test shape and ornament ( Fig. 19 View FIGURE 19 :7–10) are apparent.
Eponides repandus View in CoL is a common species in reef environments ( Bock et al. 1971; Hatta & Ujiié 1992a; Hottinger et al. 1993; Loeblich & Tappan 1994; Parker 2009), but specimens are known to display variation in the test ornament. Some specimens appear to have completely smooth tests ( Hatta & Ujiié 1992a; Hottinger et al. 1993; Loeblich & Tappan 1994) whilst others have more roughened textures due to the presence of fine perforations and their variation in size ( Bock et al. 1971; Parker 2009; Debenay 2012). The location, size and density of the pustulate ornament also varies on the CG specimens and other examples ( Bock et al. 1971; Hatta & Ujiié 1992a; Hottinger et al. 1993; Loeblich & Tappan 1994; Parker 2009). Capricorn Group specimens all possessed roughly textured test walls on their aboral sides due to poor preservation and sections of fine perforations divided by imperforate, raised sutures ( Fig. 19 View FIGURE 19 :7, 8). The amount and intensity of pustulate ornament however, varies between CG specimens. Additionally, areal sutures vary in number and proliferation along the apertural face extension with E. repandus View in CoL . Those CG specimens with a relatively large apertural face have areal sutures evenly distributed across the face, similar to the specimens described by Hatta & Ujiié (1992a) and Debenay (2012). In contrast, the specimens described by Parker (2009) and Hottinger et al. (1993) have fewer areal apertures with the largest along the periphery of the test. Furthermore, the areal apertures on the specimens illustrated by Bock et al. (1971, pl. 21, figs 6, 7) and Lobelich & Tappan (1994, pl. 268, figs 10–13) are further differentiated by having a number of areal apertures between the two extremes. The apertural face is also angled down sharply back towards the test whereas other examples, like specimens collected from the CG, have only a gently sloping face.
The original description of E. repandus View in CoL by Fichtel & Moll (1798) is based on material from the Mediterranean Sea. This species has a global distribution (Florida Bay—Bock et al. 1971; Ryukyu Island Arc—Hatta & Ujiié 1992a; Gulf of Aqaba—Hottinger et al. 1991a and 1993; northeast Timor Sea from 72 m—Loeblich & Tappan 1994; restricted to deeper waters in gaps between reefs at Ningaloo Reef—Parker 2009; New Caledonia southern shelf from 30+ m—Debenay 2012).
Distribution within study area. Eponides repandus was only found in low abundance (one to six specimens per site) in One Tree lagoons and the channel sample. The site of greatest abundance is site 34 in One Tree Lagoon 1, which is the centre of the deepest One Tree Lagoon. This distribution matches those previously reported by Loeblich & Tappan (1994) and Parker (2009).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Discorboidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Eponidinae |
Eponides de Montfort 1808
Mamo, Briony L. 2016 |
E. repandus (
Fichtel & Moll 1798 |