Calcarina capricornia, Mamo, Briony L., 2016

Mamo, Briony L., 2016, Benthic Foraminifera from the Capricorn Group, Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Zootaxa 4215 (1), pp. 1-123 : 102-103

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4215.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B91D1782-C11A-4CDC-96B6-76104FEE51BD

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6067892

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0389064B-FF9F-3D08-3EEE-E0EBFE5AB894

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Calcarina capricornia
status

sp. nov.

Calcarina capricornia View in CoL n. sp. ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 :5–14)

1965 Calcarina hispida Brady ; Jell et al., 277, pl. 44, fig. 3.

2002 Calcarina spengleri Gmelin ; Lobegeier, p. 212, pl. 1, figs 1–8; pl. 2, figs 1–7.

Diagnosis. This species is determind by its large size, thick, coarsely perforate test wall featuring pustolose ornamentation and multiple spines that are canaliculate throughout.

Description. Test free, unequally biconvex and trochospiral. Large in size (1.3–1.6 mm diameter without spines), with thick, coarsely perforate test walls ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 :10) with calcite bosses on both the umbilical and spiral sides of the test, though in greater abundance on the spiral side. Five to seventeen thick spines with spikes extending from the test periphery that are canaliculate throughout ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 :5, 12, 14). Chambers slightly inflated with depressed sutures clearly visible on umbilical side ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 :8, 9).

Remarks. This species is characterised by its thick, coarsely perforate test wall, its large size, visibly depressed sutures and its large number of spines that are canaliculate throughout.

Calcarina capricornia View in CoL bears similarity to Calcarina hispida Brady 1876 View in CoL but C. hispida View in CoL has a non-perforate test that is smaller in size and its spines are non-canaliculate in the centre ( Renema & Hohenegger 2005). Additionally, C. capiricornia does not possess the same mass of hispid spines across the test that cover the test so thickly that they obscure the sutures except for the final few chambers. Calcarina exuberans Debenay 2013 View in CoL (previously Calcarina hispida var. pulchella Chapman 1900 View in CoL ) bears similarity to C. capricornia View in CoL , particularly with the large number of thick spines, however the test wall is much thinner, the spines are more numerous and more varied in nature and the test is smaller—the same size as C. hispida View in CoL . Calcarina capricornia View in CoL additionally lacks the distinct “exuberant” outgrowths on the extremities of the spines that make C. exuberans View in CoL so distinctive. Calcarina gaudichaudii d’Orbigny 1840 View in CoL is similar to this species in that they both possess distinctly thick, perforated test walls yet C. gaudichaudii View in CoL has a much smoother test with smaller calicitic bosses, a pinched periphery, and bears fewer spines which are more regular, without spikes and have a blunted tip.

Intraspecific variability includes the number of spines and the abundance and distribution of the calcitic bosses. Some specimens have calcitic bosses isolated to the central area of the test and others have them covering most of the test, including the spaces between spines.

This species has been previously recorded from the GBR on both Heron Island ( Jell et al. 1965) and Green Island ( Lobegeier 2002). Jell et al. (1965) reported this species where it commonly constituted 50% or more of sedimentary grains, but was not present in dredged samples from deeper waters and Lobegeier’s (2002) investigation found them to be a robust species habituating areas of high UV-radiation levels and high energy reef flat environments within strands of filamentous turf algae including Laurencia sp. and Chlorodesmis fastigiata .

Derivation of name. This species is named after the region from the southern GBR where it was collectedthe Capricorn Group.

Material. Holotype—QM#G465953 ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 :5); Paratypes QM#G465800 ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 :6, 7), QM#G465799 ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 :8, 9), QM#G465783 ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 :10), QM#G466041 ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 :11, 12) and QM#G466047 ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 :13, 14), all specimens were retrieved at a depth of 3 m or less from Heron Reef flat, Capricorn Group, Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Holocene.

Distribution within study area. Calcarina capricornia was collected from all sampled reefs and often accounted for 50–75% of all specimens collected from each site. In fact, C. capricornia was the most abundant species from the CG, accounting for 38.6% of the total number of foram specimens collected. This species occurs in shallow, high energy, tidally influenced waters across reef flat areas similar to other Calcarina species ( Hohenegger et al. 1999; Lobegeier 2002; Yordanova & Hohenegger 2002; Renema & Hohenegger 2005). Sites of low abundance include site 10 along ST transect and site 15, along transect 2 across Heron Reef flat where the edge of the reef flat becomes pure reef platform to rubble zone and there are low levels of sedimentation and algae growth. Additionally, the three deepest sites within Heron Lagoon also have the lowest abundance. The same pattern occurs in Wistari and One Tree Lagoons. Of note is that where the abundance of C. capricornia decreases, the abundance of B. sphaerulata often increases. The most extreme example of this case occurs at site 15 along Transect 2 of Heron Reef and site 28, Sykes Reef and is likely due to a shift in dominant algal type in different regions of the reef flat.

Kingdom

Chromista

Phylum

Foraminifera

Class

Globothalamea

Order

Rotaliida

Family

Calcarinidae

Genus

Calcarina

Loc

Calcarina capricornia

Mamo, Briony L. 2016
2016
Loc

Calcarina exuberans

Debenay 2013
2013
Loc

Calcarina hispida var. pulchella

Chapman 1900
1900
Loc

Calcarina hispida

Brady 1876
1876
Loc

Calcarina gaudichaudii d’Orbigny 1840

d'Orbigny 1840
1840
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF