Kateretidae, Erichson, 1846
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5329313 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5397243 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0388D148-EA0E-8738-FE23-FD6AFBD76519 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Kateretidae |
status |
|
Key to Kateretidae View in CoL View at ENA genera of Japan
1 Tarsal claws not dentate or slightly dilated at base ( Figs. 3J View Fig , 5E View Fig , 9E View Fig ). Apical segment of maxillary palpus slender ( Figs. 3I View Fig , 5F View Fig , 8G View Fig , 9F View Fig ). Ovipositor with styli ( Figs. 3D View Fig , 4G View Fig , 5D View Fig , 6F View Fig , 7G View Fig , 8D View Fig , 9D View Fig ). ............................................................................................................. 2
– Tarsal claws distinctly dentate at base ( Figs. 10F View Fig , 11H View Fig ).Apical segment of maxillary palpus enlarged ( Figs. 10E View Fig , 11G View Fig ). Ovipositor without styli ( Figs. 10G View Fig , 11D View Fig ). ......................... 5
2 Abdominal sternite III or III–V with tuft of setae in the middle in both sexes ( Figs. 5H View Fig , 9K View Fig ). Ovipositor with short styli ( Figs. 5D View Fig , 9D View Fig ). ............................................................ 3
– Abdominal sternite III or III–V without tuft of setae. Ovipositor with long styli ( Figs. 3D View Fig , 4G View Fig , 6F View Fig , 7G View Fig , 8D View Fig ). ............................................................................................................. 4
3 Color reddish-yellow to dark brown. Lateral margins of pronotum smooth. Male protibia strongly arcuate ( Figs. 2D View Fig , 9I View Fig ). Abdominal sternite III with tuft of setae in middle ( Fig. 9K View Fig ). ...................................................................................... Sibirhelus Kirejtshuk, 1989
– Color black. Lateral margins of pronotum distinctly serrate ( Fig. 5G View Fig ). Male protibia straight. Abdominal sternites III–V with tuft of setae in middle ( Fig. 5H View Fig ). ............................ ................................................................................................. Platamartus Reitter, 1892
4 Pronotum rounded at posterior angles ( Fig. 3H View Fig ). Dorsal pronotal disc surface with coarse, large punctures, larger than eye-facet. Abdominal tergite VIII in males concealed. ........ ...................................................................................................... Kateretes Herbst, 1793 View in CoL
– Pronotum angulate at posterior angles ( Figs. 6H–N View Fig , 7I View Fig , 8F View Fig ). Dorsal pronotal disc surface with dense, small punctures, smaller than eye-facet. Abdominal tergite VIII in males exposed. .................................................................... Heterhelus Jacquelin du Val, 1858 View in CoL
5 Dorsal pronotal disc surface with sparse punctures, and sparsely covered with short setae ( Fig. 2E View Fig ). Pronotum narrower than elytra at base; posterior angles obtuse ( Fig. 10H View Fig ); hind margin straight. ................................................................ Brachypterus Kugelann, 1794 View in CoL
– Dorsal pronotal disc surface with dense punctures, and densely covered with long setae ( Fig. 2F View Fig ). Pronotum as wide as elytra at base; posterior angles angulate ( Fig. 11F View Fig ); hind margin sinuate. ............................................................ Brachypterolus Grouvelle, 1913 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.