Manouria impressa (Günther)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13229011 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038887B8-EC42-FFE3-FC69-FBD85E9CF894 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Manouria impressa (Günther) |
status |
|
Manouria impressa (Günther) View in CoL
( Fig. 8 View Fig )
Testudo impressa – Smith, 1922: 264.
Manouria impressa View in CoL – Lim & Das, 1999: 112; Sharma & Tisen, 2000: 128.
Material examined. – None.
Observation. – One photographed ( Fig. 8 View Fig ) along Bishop’s Trail at about 900 m between April and May 1994 (D. Wee & A. T. C. Wong). Manouria impressa may be clearly distinguished from M. emys by comparisons of carapace scute characters. In M. impressa , the dark/black pigmentation is confined only to the anterior margins of each scute, whereas in M. emys , this dark pigmentation lines the entire margin of each scute. Furthermore, in M. impressa , the first to third (most anterior) vertebral scutes exhibit a fairly uniform ‘rectangular’ shape, whereas in M. emys , the first vertebral scute adopts a pentagonal shape, followed by the second and third which adopt a hexagonal shape (Lim & Das, 1999).
ORDER SQUAMATA
FAMILY GEKKONIDAE
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Manouria impressa (Günther)
Leong, T. M. & Lim, Kelvin K. P. 2003 |
Testudo impressa
Smith, M 1922: 264 |