Trigonocarinatus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5431.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4E009D84-E49A-4544-BAA3-B91E603FB0BC |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03887A7B-D742-FFC4-93CD-43B8FAA0FB8F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Trigonocarinatus |
status |
|
Trigonocarinatus nr. bilineatus (Kapur)
( Fig. 57 View FIGURE 57 )
Diagnosis. The elytral pattern, shape and position of the elytral maculae in this species are unique ( Fig. 57a View FIGURE 57 ). However, the male genitalia ( Fig. 57f–i View FIGURE 57 ), particularly the penis guide ( Fig. 57f View FIGURE 57 ) of this species in lateral view, are similar to that illustrated by Kapur (1948) for C. bilineatus (see notes on T. bilineatus ). But the female genitalia ( Fig. 57j View FIGURE 57 ) has a distinctly shorter and narrower sperm duct and the spermatheca ( Fig. 57k View FIGURE 57 ) is also apically less narrow. In view of the uncertainty over the identity of T. bilineatus , it is only tentatively identified and briefly described below.
Brief Description. Length: 1.90–2.10 mm; width: 1.60–1.80 mm. Form broad oval, dorsum convex and densely pubescent. Head yellow in male with a black frontal spot, black in female. Pronotum black except lateral flanks yellow, posterolateral corners black. Scutellum black. Elytra black, with two orange-yellow spots on each elytron, first one a little above midline, transverse quadrate, second spot apical and oblique oval ( Fig. 57a View FIGURE 57 ). Ventral side dark brownish, mouthparts yellowish brown, tarsi of legs lighter, yellowish brown. Head densely punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1.0 diameter. Antenna 9-segmented, club fusiform and distinctly longer than width of scape ( Fig. 57b View FIGURE 57 ). Mentum cordiform, anterior margin with a broadly triangular emargination ( Fig. 57c View FIGURE 57 ). Prosternum without a triangular fold, prosternal carinae elongate, inverted Y-shaped with a barely visible stem ( Fig. 57d View FIGURE 57 ). Abdominal postcoxal line incomplete ( Fig. 57e View FIGURE 57 ). Male genitalia ( Fig. 57f–i View FIGURE 57 ) as illustrated, penis guide broadest around middle and distinctly longer than parameres in lateral view ( Fig. 57f View FIGURE 57 ), elongate lanceolate and apically triangular in ventral view ( Fig. 57g View FIGURE 57 ), parameres with few elongate apical setae; penis ( Fig. 57h View FIGURE 57 ) slender and strongly curved with a distinct capsule, apex lanceolate ( Fig. 57i View FIGURE 57 ). Female genitalia ( Fig. 57j View FIGURE 57 ) as illustrated, spermatheca ( Fig. 57k View FIGURE 57 ) strongly curved, distinctly narrowed apically, only ramus well defined.
Material examined. “ INDIA: Andaman & Nicobar, Middle Andaman: Rangat, 12°30’19.4’’N 92°55’05.9”E, 17.2m, 20.iv.2014, Light trap, Yeshwanth, H.M. ( NBAIR); “ INDIA: Andaman & Nicobar, North Andaman , Diglipur, 13°14’53.9”N 92°58’37.5”E, 15mts, 21.iv.2014, Light trap, Yeshwanth, H.M. ( NBAIR) GoogleMaps .
Distribution. India: Andaman Islands.
Prey / associated habitat. Veenakumari & Mohanraj (2007) recorded Cryptogonus sp. nr. bilineatus Kapur on coconut from the Andaman Islands, which is most likely to be this species. Attracted to light (label data).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.