Cryptogonus loebli Canepari
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5431.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4E009D84-E49A-4544-BAA3-B91E603FB0BC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10898161 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03887A7B-D72A-FFAC-93CD-42D0FDCCFC89 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cryptogonus loebli Canepari |
status |
|
Cryptogonus loebli Canepari, 1986: 27 .— Poorani 2002: 345; Huo et al. 2015c: 208.
Canepari (1986) described it based on two female specimens from Garhwal, Uttarakhand, and illustrated the habitus and the female genitalia. It is characterized as follows by Canepari (1986): “Length: 2.45–2.75 mm; width: 1.85– 2.10 mm. Head black; pronotum black with red anterior corners; elytra black with two red bands, the first wide and sub-basal, the second narrower and near the apex”.
The description and the habitus illustration given by Canepari (1986) are not adequate for its correct interpretation and no matching specimens could be found. It could be a variant of a more common species of Cryptogonus .
Distribution. India: Uttarakhand.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cryptogonus loebli Canepari
POORANI, J. 2024 |
Cryptogonus loebli
Huo, L. & Li, W. & Chen, X. & Ren, S. & Wang, X. 2015: 208 |
Poorani, J. 2002: 345 |
Canepari, C. 1986: 27 |