Cryptogonus hingstoni Kapur
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5431.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4E009D84-E49A-4544-BAA3-B91E603FB0BC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10898157 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03887A7B-D728-FFAC-93CD-46B3FCEFFE5F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cryptogonus hingstoni Kapur |
status |
|
( Fig. 25a–c View FIGURE 25 )
Cryptogonus hingstoni Kapur, 1948: 103 .— Poorani 2002: 344; Kovář 2007: 575; Huo et al. 2015c: 206 View Cited Treatment .
Diagnosis. Length: 2.80 mm; width: 2.20 mm. Form short oval, convex and densely pubescent. Ground colour yellowish-orange to reddish brown ( Fig. 25a–c View FIGURE 25 ), pronotum with a black median macula below anterior margin and before midline ( Fig. 25a, c View FIGURE 25 ), scutellar shield dark reddish brown, elytra with five small black spots roughly forming a ‘W’ pattern in dorsal view ( Fig. 25a View FIGURE 25 ). Ventral side reddish brown except meso- and metaventrites darker, blackish. Genitalia not studied.
Material examined. “ Sikkim: Singhik , 5000 ft, 24.iv.1924, Maj. R.W.G. Hingston /Everest Exp. Brit. Mus. 1924-326” ( BMNH: 4). Bearing a note by R.G. Booth “Probably the type series, but see slide colln.? ♀ abd. on slide 1946, but desc. 1948 says ♀ not known” .
Distribution. India (Sikkim); China.
Notes. It is superficially similar to C. ariasi but can be distinguished by the elytral pattern, with the spots looking like a mirror image of the latter and forming a roughly W-shaped pattern, and the male genitalia. The holotype male ( BMNH, examined) is illustrated here and matching specimens could not be examined for detailed study of the genitalia. The specimens at BMNH are accompanied by a note by R.G. Booth —“Probably the type series, but see slide colln.? ♀ abd. on slide 1946, but desc. 1948 says ♀ not known”. However, the label data of these specimens match those given by Kapur for the type material (1948) .
Huo et al. (2015c) recorded it from China and illustrated the habitus and the male genitalia. See Kapur (1948) and Huo et al. (2015c) for detailed description and illustrations.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cryptogonus hingstoni Kapur
POORANI, J. 2024 |
Cryptogonus hingstoni
Huo, L. & Li, W. & Chen, X. & Ren, S. & Wang, X. 2015: 206 |
Kovar, I. 2007: 575 |
Poorani, J. 2002: 344 |
Kapur, A. P. 1948: 103 |