Cryptogonus complexus Kapur
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5431.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4E009D84-E49A-4544-BAA3-B91E603FB0BC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10898137 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03887A7B-D71F-FF93-93CD-456CFB4AFB1B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cryptogonus complexus Kapur |
status |
|
( Figs 17–19 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 )
Cryptogonus complexus Kapur, 1948: 110 (Holotype ♂; BMNH).— Poorani 2002: 344; Kovář 2007: 575; Ren et al. 2009: 112, 113; Dorji et al. 2019: 502.
Cryptogonus complexus var. vittatus Kapur, 1948: 110 .— Poorani 2002: 344.
Cryptogonus complexus var. posticus Kapur, 1948: 110 .— Poorani 2002: 344.
Diagnosis. Form broad oval, moderately convex. Head yellow in male, black in female, pronotum black except anterior margin yellowish or reddish brown, anterolateral angles yellow; elytral pattern highly variable, commonly found variations as follows: (a) elytra black with an apical, angular yellow spot ( Fig. 17a, b View FIGURE 17 ) ( var. posticus ); (b) elytra black with a large, transverse yellow macula in apical one-third, apical margin black ( Fig. 18a, b View FIGURE 18 ); (c) elytra black with a yellowish or reddish, elongate oval discal spot, posterior third of elytra yellow and anteriorly merged with the discal spot, elytral apices yellow ( Fig. 19a, b View FIGURE 19 ) or black; (d) elytra with reddish or orange-yellow discal vittae, basal, lateral and sutural margins black ( var. vittatus ) ( Fig. 19d, e View FIGURE 19 ). Prosternum ( Fig. 18d View FIGURE 18 ) as illustrated. Abdominal postcoxal line incomplete ( Figs 17c, d View FIGURE 17 , 19f View FIGURE 19 ). Male genitalia ( Figs 17e–h View FIGURE 17 , 18e–g View FIGURE 18 , 19g –i View FIGURE 19 ), female genitalia ( Figs 17i View FIGURE 17 , 18h View FIGURE 18 ) and spermatheca ( Fig. 18i View FIGURE 18 ) as illustrated.
Type material examined. Holotype male, “TYPE (red bordered circular label)/Doherty/ Assam, Patkai Mts /Fry Coll. 1905-100/61817/ Cryptogonus complexus , n.sp. Type A.P. Kapur 1947” ( BMNH) ; Paratype with same data except no. 61843 ( BMNH: 1) .
Cryptogonus complexus ab. posticalis Kapur : “Type (red bordered circular label)/Doherty/Assam Patkai Mts/ Fry Coll. 1905-100/ Cryptogonus complexus , ab. nov. posticalis ( TYPE), A.P. Kapur, 1947” ( BMNH); “Sikkim: Singhik, 5000 ft, 24.iv.1924, Major R.W.G. Hingston /Everest Exp. Brit. Mus. 1924-386/ Cryptogonus complexus ab. posticalis (Paratype), A.P. Kapur det. 1947” ( BMNH); “ BURMA: Mishmi Hills, Dingliang, 2450 ft, 12.iii.35, M. Steele /Brit. Mus. 1935-312/ Cryptogonus complexus ab. posticalis (Paratype) A.P. Kapur det. 1947”, head and pronotum missing ( BMNH) .
Cryptogonus complexus ab. vittatus Kapur: “Type (red bordered circular label)/ Assam, Patkai Mts /Doherty/Fry Coll. 1905-100/ Cryptogonus complexus ab. nov. vittatus TYPE, A.P. Kapur, 1947” ( BMNH); 3 paratypes with same data ( BMNH) .
Distribution. India (Assam (Patkai Mountains); Manipur; Meghalaya; Sikkim; Tripura); Bhutan; Nepal; Myanmar; China.
Prey / Associated habitat. Collected on mulberry (label data). Distributed at an altitude of 1001–1500 m in the northeastern region of India ( Shantibala & Singh 1991).
Seasonal occurrence. Collected in March–April, October–November (label data).
Notes. This is one of the most variable species of Cryptogonus and appears to be the most common in the northeastern region of India along with C. quadriguttatus . Of the two variants described by Kapur (1948), Cryptogonus complexus var. posticus is very similar to C. himalayensis in having black elytra with yellow apices. Kapur’s type material of var. posticus at BMNH (examined) is labelled as “ Cryptogonus complexus ab. posticalis”. Cryptogonus complexus var. vittatus (published as vittata by Kapur 1948) has black elytra with a pair of elongate reddish-yellowish bands of variable size reaching up to 2/3 rd length of elytra or with elongate oval spots as in C. orbiculus . The nominate form (see holotype in Fig. 19a–c View FIGURE 19 ) looks somewhat similar to C. downingi . The male genitalia are identical in all these variants. Cryptogonus brachylobius Pang, 1998 , has almost identical male genitalia (see illustrations in Ren et al. 2009) with almost fully blackish elytra with pale apices and it is likely to be a synonym of C. complexus . See Kapur (1948) and Ren et al. (2009) for detailed description and illustrations.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cryptogonus complexus Kapur
POORANI, J. 2024 |
Cryptogonus complexus
Dorji, C. & Loday, P. & Vorst, O. 2019: 502 |
Ren, S. X. & Wang, X. M. & Pang, H. & Peng, Z. Q. & Zeng, T. 2009: 112 |
Kovar, I. 2007: 575 |
Poorani, J. 2002: 344 |
Kapur, A. P. 1948: 110 |
Cryptogonus complexus var. vittatus
Poorani, J. 2002: 344 |
Kapur, A. P. 1948: 110 |
Cryptogonus complexus var. posticus
Poorani, J. 2002: 344 |
Kapur, A. P. 1948: 110 |