Linothele longicauda ( Ausserer, 1871 )

Drolshagen, Bastian & Bäckstam, Christian M., 2021, A taxonomic review of the mygalomorph spider genus Linothele Karsch, 1879 (Araneae, Dipluridae), Zoosystema 43 (10), pp. 163-196 : 177-178

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5252/zoosystema2021v43a10

publication LSID

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2763DA07-4D8F-4CA2-BB63-E5BC26470296

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4721092

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0386CD35-FF8C-FFB1-7585-F8CE47AB91D9

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Linothele longicauda ( Ausserer, 1871 )
status

 

Linothele longicauda ( Ausserer, 1871) View in CoL

( Fig. 10 View FIG )

Diplura longicauda Ausserer, 1871: 178 .

Diplura aequatorialis Ausserer, 1871: 179 , n. syn.

Diplura cousini Simon, 1889a: 400 , n. syn.

Linothele longicauda View in CoL – Raven 1985: 74.

Linothele aequatorialis View in CoL – Raven 1985: 74.

Linothele cousini View in CoL – Raven 1985: 74.

TYPE MATERIAL. — Diplura longicauda : Holotype. Ecuador • imm. ♂; Quito ; Schmarda leg.; NHMW I.N.: 61, examined.

Diplura aequatorialis : Holotype. Ecuador • indet.; Cordillera ; Schmarda leg.; NHMW I.N.: 59, examined.

Diplura cousini : Syntypes. Ecuador • 2 ♀, 1 imm. ♂; Quito , Rumipamba ; A. Cousin leg.; MNHN-AR-AR4938 ( B338 ), examined .

TYPE LOCALITY. — Quito, Ecuador.

DISTRIBUTION. — Cordillera to Quito, Ecuador.

DIAGNOSIS. — Females of Linothele longicauda differ from those of all other species of Linothele by the combined presence of divided scopula, rigid apical segments of the PLS, but absence of preeningcombs, maculae and patterns on the opisthosoma. They can further be distinguished from females of other species by their genital morphology and from females of L. pukachumpi by the absence of yellowish setae on the carapace.

DESCRIPTION

Male

Unknown.

Female

Colouration in alcohol: Prosoma, opisthosoma, chelicerae, legs and pedipalps uniformly brown; maculae absent. Clypeus: narrow. Leg formula: 4123. Scopula divided.Preening-combs absent, see Figure 10A, B View FIG . Leg tarsi pseudo-segmented. Spinnerets: apical segments of the PLS rigid. Spermathecae: consisting of two apically elongated stalks, bearing several vesicles at 1:2-1:3A, see Figure 10B, C View FIG .

Variability

CL = 8.6-9.2. CT = 9-12. MC = 37-61.

REMARKS

Ausserer (1871) wrongly stated that the holotype of D. longicauda was a female. It is in fact an immature male. As it lacks a spermatheca, the holotype of D. longicauda cannot be distinguished from the syntypes of D. cousini , both originating from the same type locality (Quito).

The medial and apical segments of the PLS of the holotype of Diplura aequatorialis are missing. The epigastrium has been dissected by an earlier examiner, but no preparation can be found in the vial of the holotype. Bücherl et al. (1971: 117) considered Diplura nigerrima Mello-Leitão, 1941 and D. bitaeniata Mello-Leitão, 1941 junior synonyms of D. aequatorialis . According to the authors, the type specimens should be deposited at MNRJ, but Silva-Moreira et al. (2010) did not list them for MNRJ collection. Of all material examined by Bücherl et al. (1971), only the material of Harmonicon nigridorsi Mello-Leitão, 1924 could be located in MNRJ collection by Silva-Moreira et al. (2010). The synonymies of D. nigerrima and D. bitaeniata established by Bücherl et al. (1971: 117) are rejected for the following reasons: apparently, the apical segments of the PLS in D. nigerrima and D. bitaeniata were very elongated. Unfortunately, Mello-Leitão (1941a) did not explicitly state on the structure of the apical PLS segment in any of the two species, but in no other species, except for L. sericata , the apical PLS segment is as elongated as mentioned for D. nigerrima ; PLS: 23.4 (5.6, 5.6, 12.2). Sizes (22.6 for D. bitaeniata , 37.0 for D. nigerrima ; both probably incl. chelicerae) and CT (9 for D. bitaeniata , 8 for D. nigerrima ) might well fall within the range observed for Linothele sericata . Additionally, the dorsal pattern on the opisthosoma, which Mello-Leitão (1941a) described for D. bitaeniata and Paz & Raven (1990) described for L. megatheloides , resembles that of younger L. sericata , whereas the holotype of D. aequatorialis bears no distinct pattern. Furthermore, the type localities (both Bogotá) of Diplura bitaeniata and D. nigerrima are consistent with the one of L. sericata and notably disjunct from the rather unspecific type locality of D. aequatorialis . As a result, D. bitaeniata n. syn. and D. nigerrima n. syn. are removed from the synonymy of L. aequatorialis and instead considered junior synonyms of L. sericata . The holotype of D. aequatorialis matches variation and overall appearance observed in the types of D. longicauda and D. cousini . The holotype of D. longicauda is indistinguishable from the types of D. cousini and D. aequatorialis . As a result, L. aequatorialis n. syn. and L. cousini n. syn. are considered junior synonyms of L. longicauda .

NATURAL HISTORY

Unknown.

NHMW

Austria, Wien, Naturhistorisches Museum Wien

NHMW

Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Dipluridae

Genus

Linothele

Loc

Linothele longicauda ( Ausserer, 1871 )

Drolshagen, Bastian & Bäckstam, Christian M. 2021
2021
Loc

Linothele longicauda

RAVEN R. J. 1985: 74
1985
Loc

Linothele aequatorialis

RAVEN R. J. 1985: 74
1985
Loc

Linothele cousini

RAVEN R. J. 1985: 74
1985
Loc

Diplura cousini

SIMON E. 1889: 400
1889
Loc

Diplura longicauda

AUSSERER A. 1871: 178
1871
Loc

Diplura aequatorialis

AUSSERER A. 1871: 179
1871
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF