Amphidraus tundama, Galvis, William, 2017

Galvis, William, 2017, Nineteen new species of Amphidraus Simon, 1900 (Salticidae: Euophryini) from Colombia, with comments about their conservation, Zootaxa 4286 (1), pp. 1-40 : 23-25

Amphidraus tundama sp. nov.

Figs 13c–f , 18g –i , 23a–c , 25d, 25j , 26a , 27

Types. Holotype: male from Reserva Natural Las Lagunas Encantadas, Páramo La Rusia, Duitama , Boyacá , Colombia, 3800 m, 5.970277°N, 73.085°W, 24.III.2014, J. Díaz ( ICN –Ar 7839). Paratypes: three females with the same locality of the holotype , 22–24.III.2014, D. Triana, J. Díaz, S. Galvis ( ICN –Ar 7 845–46, 7848). Two females with the same locality of the holotype , 23.III.2014, J. Díaz ( MACN –Ar 36222). One male and one female with the same locality of the holotype , 24.III.2014, C. Alonso, Y. Cifuentes ( MCZ 76703, 76710 ). Four females with the same locality of the holotype , 17–18.IV.2014, C. Alonso, S. Galvis ( ICN –Ar 7842–7843, 7847). One male with the same locality of the holotype , 17.IV.2014, C. Alonso ( MACN –Ar 36221). One male from Duitama, Boyacá , Colombia, 3600 m, 5.943333°N, 73.107777°W, 5.III.2015, J. Barrera, S. Mondragón ( ICN –Ar 8 258).

Etymology. The epithet is a noun in apposition that honors the Cacique Tundama , leader and lord of the indigenous people that inhabited the Duitama region of the Boyacá department, one of the four supreme rulers of the Muisca Confederation, in the 16th century. Renowned for his brave and fierce defense of the Muisca territories against the Spanish invaders.

Diagnosis. Males of A. tundama sp. nov. are similar to those of A. zipa sp. nov by the shape of the RTA, the presence of basal widening of the embolus (bwe), and the absence of a dorsal tibial spur (DTS) in the palp. However, they can be distinguished from those by the straight shorter embolus, the absence of a process on the embolic disc (PED), the presence of a proventral and proximal femoral bump (PvFB, black arrow in Figs 13d , 23c ), and a rounded basal widening of the embolus (bwe) ( Figs 13c–d , 23a–b ). Females of A. tundama sp. nov. are similar to those of A. zipa sp. nov. by the general disposition of the internal structures of the epigyne, but they can be recognized from those for their shorter copulatory ducts, smaller sparmathecae, and the presence of a bilobed medial and posterior pocket in the epigyne ( Figs 13e–f , 25d, 25j ).

Description. Male (holotype). Total length: 2.98. Carapace yellow with two black posterior longitudinal stripes, 1.43 long, 0.97 wide, 0.72 high ( Fig. 18g ). OC black, 0.57 long. Anterior eye row 0.93 wide and posterior 0.91 wide. Sternum yellow, 0.63 long, 0.45 wide. Labium yellow, 0.12 long, 0.21 wide. Chelicerae yellow with three retromarginal and two promarginal teeth. Palp yellow with cymbium brown, with slender and longer RTA, a proventral and proximal femoral bump (PvFB), presence of basal widening of the embolus, and a straight TL and embolus ( Figs 13c–d , 23a–c ). Legs 4312, all yellow. Leg macrosetae: patella, III r 1 me; tibia, I v 2-2 -2; II v 1-1; III v 1-1, p 1-1, r 1 di; IV v 1 pr, p 1-1, r 1-1; metatarsus, I v 2-2; II v 2-2, p 1 di; III–IV v 1-1, p 1-2, r 1-2. Abdomen light brown with two longitudinal dark brown stripes, with a posterior crosslinked pattern of stripes ( Fig. 18g ).

Variation (n= 4 males). Total length 2.98–3.36. Carapace length 1.43–1.78.

Female (paratype, ICN–Ar 7845). Total length 3.37. Carapace yellow with two posterior dark brown longitudinal stripes, 1.40 long, 1.00 wide, 0.67 high ( Fig. 18h ). OC black, 0.57 long. Anterior eye row 0.96 wide and posterior 0.87 wide. Sternum yellow, 0.71 long, 0.46 wide. Labium yellow, 0.12 long, 0.19 wide. Chelicerae yellow, with three retromarginal and two promarginal teeth. Legs 4312, all yellow. Leg macrosetae: femur, II–III d 1 di; tibiae, I v 2-2 -2; II v 1-2 -2, p 1 di; III–IV v 1 pr, p 1-1, r 1-1; metatarsus, I v 2-2; II v 2-2, p 1 di; III v 2-1, p 1- 2, r 1-2; IV v 1-1, p 1-1-2, r 1-2. Abdomen light brown, with a dark brown longitudinal stripe, that is reticulated in its posterior middle ( Fig. 18h ). Epigyne ( Figs 13e–f , 25d, 25j ) with anterior copulatory openings, a posterior bilobed medial pocket, and anterior rounded spermathecae.

Variation (n=10 females). Total length 3.02–3.98. Carapace length 1.40–2.50. Some females are darker, with their carapace dark brown with a posterior longitudinal white stripe, and abdomen black with some small medial white marks (ICN–Ar 7846, Fig. 18i ).

Comments. All material examined was collected in a preserved high-mountain Páramo ecosystem ( Fig. 26a ), in Frailejón rotten trunks ( Espeletia sp.), and in a smaller number beating low shrubs.

Distribution. Colombia (Boyacá) ( Fig. 27 ). Known altitudinal distribution: 3600–3800 m.

Figures

FIGURES 13 a – f. A. tisquesusa sp. nov., a) left male palp, ventral view; b) same, retrolateral view. A. tundama sp. nov., c) left male palp, ventral view; d) same, retrolateral view (black arrow showing the proventral femoral and proximal bump of the palpal femur, PvFB); e) epigyne, cleared, ventral view; f) same, dorsal view. Abbreviations: bwe = basal widening of the embolus, cd = copulatory duct, co = copulatory opening, e = embolus, ED = embolic disc, EF = embolic filament, fd = fertilization duct, PED = process on embolic disc, po = epigynal pocket, RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis of the male palp, SD = sperm duct, sp = spermatheca, TL = tegular lobe. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (a – b, e – f); 0.25 mm (c – d).

FIGURES 18 a – i. A. somondoco sp. nov., a) female holotype (ANDES – IN 2899). A. sotairensis sp. nov., b) male holotype (ICN – Ar 7981). A. sua sp. nov., c) male holotype (ICN – Ar 8271); d) female paratype (ICN – Ar 8272). A. tanimuca sp. nov., e) male holotype (ICN – Ar 6775). A. tisquesusa sp. nov., f) male holotype (ICN – Ar 8256). A. tundama sp. nov., g) male holotype (ICN – Ar 7839); h) female paratype (ICN – Ar 7845); i) female paratype (ICN – Ar 7846). Scale bars: 0.50 mm.

FIGURES 23 a – g. Amphidraus spp, left male palp. A. tundama sp. nov., a) ventral view; b) same, retrolateral view; c) palpal femur, showing the proventral bump (PvFB, black arrow), ventral view. A. zaque sp. nov., d) ventral view; e) same, retrolateral view. A. zipa sp. nov., f) ventral view; g) same, showing the proventral femoral widening (PvFw, black arrow) in the femur, retrolateral view.

FIGURES 25 a – l. Amphidraus spp, epigyne. A. sikuani sp. nov., a) ventral view; g) disposition of the internal structures. A. somondoco sp. nov., b) ventral view; h) disposition of the internal structures. A. sua sp. nov., c) ventral view; i) disposition of the internal structures. A. tundama sp. nov., d) ventral view; j) disposition of the internal structures. A. zaque sp. nov., e) ventral view; k) disposition of the internal structures. A. zipa sp. nov., f) ventral view; l) disposition of the internal structures.

FIGURES 26 a – d. Different altitudinal ecosystems where some of the species of Amphidraus here described were found in Colombia. a) Páramo ecosystem, at Las Lagunas Encantadas Natural Reserve, Duitama, Colombia, habitat of A. tundama sp. nov. (~ 3800 m); b) Andean wet forest at Cueva de los Guácharos National Natural Park, Huila, Colombia, habitat of A. guaitipan sp. nov. (~ 2000 m); c) Andean Oak forest (Quercus humboldtii) at Quinini Natural Reserve, Cundinamarca, Colombia, habitat of A. quinini sp. nov. (~ 1700 m); d) Secondary lowland semi wet forest on the outskirts of the city of Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia, habitat of A. sikuani sp. nov. (~ 500 m).

FIGURE 27. Distribution records of the species of the genus Amphidraus Simon from Colombia treated here. Symbols with a dot inside represent species that have distributions in the Cundiboyacense high-Andean plateau, in the Boyacá and Cundinamarca departments.