Lepidiella Enderlein, 1937
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4551.4.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F70F17F4-B821-4F34-90A7-AA9502F06604 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5931401 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038687B3-FFCE-FF9C-FF71-158D3AB924A2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lepidiella Enderlein, 1937 |
status |
|
Key to males of Lepidiella Enderlein, 1937 View in CoL View at ENA
1 Head without cornicula............................................................................... 2
- Head with multilobed cornicula......................................................................... 6
2 Internal paramere with bifurcated apex.................................. L. flabellata View in CoL ( Bravo & Santos 2011, Fig. 6)
- Internal paramere not bifurcated, blade shaped............................................................. 3
3 Ejaculatory apodeme narrow in dorsal view........................................ L. spinosa View in CoL ( Bravo 2005, Fig. 5)
- Ejaculatory apodeme broad in dorsal view, wider than gonocoxite............................................... 4
4 Ejaculatory apodeme short, 0.7 times the length of gonocoxite.......................................... L. hansoni
- Ejaculatory apodeme long, 2 times the length of gonocoxite.................................................. 5
5 Margins of pedicel divergent distally larger than base; hypandrium subrectangular with microtrichia sparrow uniformly, not arranged in circular groups............................................. L. olgae View in CoL ( Bravo & Araújo 2013, Fig. 2H View FIGURE 2 )
- Margins of pedicel parallel; hypandrium wider in the middle portion with microtrichia arranged in circular groups............................................................................................ L. maculosa sp. nov.
6 Scape with a pronounced internal distal lobe............................................................... 7
- Scape cylindrical or with a short internal distal expansion................................................... 12
7 First flagellomere 3.0 X as long as the second....................................................... L. robusta View in CoL - First flagellomere nearly the same length of second......................................................... 8
8 Scape 3.5 X as long as pedicel.............................................................. L. monteverdica View in CoL
- Scape 2.0 – 2.5 times the length of pedicel................................................................ 9
9 Aedeagal apodeme narrow in dorsal view, narrower than the gonocoxite................ L. cervi View in CoL ( Satchell 1955, Fig. 5C)
- Aedeagal apodeme broad in dorsal view, with approximately the same width as the gonocoxite..................... 10
10 Eyes separated by 3.5 facet diameters............................................................. L. albipeda View in CoL
- Eyes separated by 1.5 facet diameters................................................................... 11
11 Aedeagus digitiform; ejaculatory apodeme 3 times the length of gonocoxite; hypandrium triangular..... L. wagneri sp. nov.
- Aedeagus with ending in a dorsal spiraliform tip; ejaculatory apodeme 1.2 times the length of gonocoxite; hypandrium subrect- angular, narrow........................................................... L. pickeringi View in CoL ( Quate 1999, Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 )
12 Eyes separated by 1 facet diameters............................................................. L. niveitarsis View in CoL
- Eyes separated by 2 or three facet diameters.............................................................. 13
13 Radial and medial forks at the same level; first flagellomere 2.0 X longer than second one................ L. lanuginosa View in CoL
- Radial fork apical to medial fork; first flagellomere with the same length or 1.3 X longer than the second one.......... 14
14 Costal area convex, expanded........................... L. matagalpensis View in CoL ( Collantes & Martínez-Ortega 1998, Fig. 4)
- Costal area narrow................................................................................... 15
15 Aedeagus and parameres asymmetrical........................................ L. zumbadoi View in CoL ( Quate 1996, Fig. 5D)
- Aedeagus and parameres symmetrical........................................ L. larryi View in CoL ( Ibañez-Bernal 2010, Fig. 6)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.