Trachelipus rathkii (Brandt, 1833)

Boeraeve, Pepijn, Arijs, Gert, Segers, Stijn, Smedt, Pallieter De, Spinicornis & Utm, Belgium. Every grid cell of the, 1908, Habitat and seasonal activity patterns of the terrestrial isopods (Isopoda: Oniscidea) of Belgium, Belgian Journal of Entomology 116, pp. 1-95 : 84-86

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13276903

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0382A91A-746F-FFDD-D153-FDFC8A0FCC27

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Trachelipus rathkii (Brandt, 1833)
status

 

36. Trachelipus rathkii (Brandt, 1833) View in CoL

( Fig. 20 h View Fig , Fig. 40 View Fig , Map 36 View Map 36 , Table 38)

Trachelipus rathkii View in CoL occurs in a wide range of habitats and is common across the country except in the south, more specifically in the ecological regions of the Ardennes and the Lorraine ( Map 36 View Map 36 ). T. rathkii View in CoL withstands inundation very well ( OOMS et al., 2020) and appears frequently near streams and rivers in open landscapes, forests and anthropogenic habitats. A relatively high number of records (43.2%) are registered in open landscape habitats ( Table 38). In particularly for grasslands, T. rathkii View in CoL can be considered as a characteristic species, next to the very common species Armadillidium vulgare View in CoL and Philoscia muscorum View in CoL . T. rathkii View in CoL occurs in forest, but is mostly confined to forest edges; however, this can be different in other regions in Europe ( DE SMEDT et al., 2018a).

T. rathkii View in CoL is less commonly found in open landscape and anthropogenic habitat during summer months ( Fig. 40 View Fig ). T. rathkii View in CoL has a relatively low desiccation resistance ( DIAS et al., 2013) and this might explain the observed pattern. In forests is the corrected number of records remarkably higher in January–February, for which we do not have a clear explanation. Using pitfall traps, DE SMEDT et al. (2021) found however an activity peak in late summer compared to other seasons.

RESULTS OF ORDINATION ANALYSIS

The ordination of species according to the main habitat type ( Fig. 41 View Fig ) shows characteristic species for all three main habitat types. The first axis is mainly a forest gradient with forest species to the left and non-forest species to the right and represents most of the variation (68%). The second axis separates species with a large proportion of records in open landscape from species most frequently recorded in anthropogenic habitat. Species like A. pictum , P. affinis , A. pulchellum , P. conspersum , L. hypnorum and A. opacum are mostly observed in forest habitat. These species have deciduous forest as their main habitat type and are rare or even absent outside forests. Species like T. sarsi and T. rathkii are, compared to other species, more frequently recorded in open landscapes. A large share of species is located near the open landscape “corner” but in between two habitat types i.e. H. mengii , T. albidus and T. provisorius between open landscape and forest and P. hoffmannseggii , A. vulgare and M. leydigii between open landscape and anthropogenic habitat. Although these species have an important share of their observations in open landscapes, open landscape records never exceed 50% of the corrected number records ( Fig. 42 View Fig ). Anthropogenic habitat on the other hand has many characteristic species like P. spinicornis , P. pruinosus , A. nasatum , P. dilatatus and A. dentiger . In the middle of the ordination diagram we find a collection of species without a strong habitat preference. These are P. scaber , O. asellus , P. muscorum , H. danicus and H. riparius .

The ordination of species according to the two-month period of observation ( Fig. 43 View Fig ) show some clear preferences of species for different seasons. The two-month periods are ordinated clockwise indicating an overall seasonal pattern. The first two axis represent 77.9% of the variation in the species data. The first axis (56%) represents mainly the differences between winter (to the left) and summer (to the right). The second axis (21.9%) represents the difference between spring (lower part) and autumn (higher part). Small and drought-sensitive species like T. sarsi , T. albidus , H. danicus and T. pygmaeus are more commonly found during winter months while some large and drought-resistant species are more commonly found in summer such as A. nasatum and A. vulgare . Some species are most commonly found during spring and early summer like A. opacum and H. montivagus , while H. riparius is most commonly found in autumn. P. hoffmanseggii is most commonly found in summer and autumn and is the only species that prefers summer as well as autumn. Few species have no clear seasonal pattern.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF