Chinavia difficilis (Stål), Stal
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262007000400005 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4337533 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0381DA08-FFA4-FFB5-FC01-FCD5FB3CFB5C |
treatment provided by |
Carolina (2020-07-29 18:33:19, last updated 2024-11-26 03:09:05) |
scientific name |
Chinavia difficilis (Stål) |
status |
|
( Figs. 10 View Figs )
Coloração geral do corpo verde a verde-clara; cicatrizes do pronoto, ângulos basais do escutelo e conexivo sem manchas negras. Distingue-se de C. obstinata pelo espinho abdominal mais curto, não atingindo as mesocoxas, e espiráculos escuros; distingue-sede C. napaea pelas antenas de coloração verde e gonocoxitos 8 planos. Eventualmente, algum espécime de C. napaea pode ser confundido com C. difficilis, mas as características diagnósticas aqui apresentadas permitem a identificação dessas duas espécies. Planta hospedeira desconhecida. Tamanhodos adultos: 12-15mm
Distribuição: Brasil (RJ, SP nov. reg.).
Figs. 3-13. 3, Chinavia abnormis; 4, C. armigera; 5, C. aseada (holótipo ♂); 6, C. bipunctula (lectótipo ♀); 7, C. brasicola (holótipo ♂); 8, C. callosa (holótipo); ♂; 9, C. dallasi (lectótipo ♀); 10, C. dificillis (holótipo ♀); 11, C. erythrocnemis; 12, C. esmeralda (holótipo ♂); 13, C. fuscopunctata (holótipo ♀).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
1 (by carolina, 2020-07-29 18:33:19)
2 (by carolina, 2020-07-29 18:37:15)
3 (by ExternalLinkService, 2020-07-29 18:42:47)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2020-07-29 18:53:44)
5 (by carolina, 2020-07-29 19:40:15)
6 (by carolina, 2020-07-30 16:10:40)
7 (by ExternalLinkService, 2020-12-17 14:36:24)
8 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-10-29 00:52:07)
9 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-10-29 03:24:36)
10 (by plazi, 2023-10-31 20:39:17)