Melanotis caerulescens longirostris
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.25226/bboc.v140i1.2020.a3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13755913 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0381A348-FFC9-CB32-36CA-AC183C10FD1C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Melanotis caerulescens longirostris |
status |
|
BLUE MOCKINGBIRD Melanotis caerulescens longirostris View in CoL
(vs. M. c. caerulescens total score 4)
Coloration.—Based on 52 male and 24 female longirostris vs. 29 male and 32 female caerulescens, Grant (1965a) found that ‘less than half’ of longirostris were paler in the throat and crown feathers than ‘most’ of his caerulescens sample but the palest specimens of each were indistinguishable. Therefore there is large overlap (no score).
Morphometrics.—Slightly larger but has proportionately much longer bill in both sexes (score 2) whereas the tail is shorter, especially in males (score 2). Additionally, Grant (1965a) found that coracoid length may be shorter in island birds but did not provide sufficient information to calculate effect size because he considered his sample to be inadequate (three male and six female longirostris vs. five male and two female caerulescens ). However, the measurement ranges have slight to no overlap, which suggest the difference is not minor (not scored).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.