Rhizocrinidae Jaekel, 1894
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4963.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ACEC045B-AEE7-43FB-A074-D2AD6CB40F1D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4730441 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038187A7-FF9A-FFDC-36A9-FA463ACBFE8C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rhizocrinidae Jaekel, 1894 |
status |
|
Family Rhizocrinidae Jaekel, 1894 View in CoL
Remarks. The distal face of the radial circlet ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ) and the presence or absence of axillary brachials ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ) have been shown to be highly useful for distinguishing the various rhizocrinid genera ( Roux et al. 2019). Those authors subdivided Conocrinus (sensu lato) into three genera, namely Conocrinus (sensu stricto), Paraconocrinus and Pseudoconocrinus . Although appearing as early as the Ypresian, Conocrinus (sensu stricto) was not found in Ilerdian strata of Corbières. The proximal columnals that constitute the proxistele of rhizocrinids are more or less thick and disc shaped, usually with flat and smooth facets. They are rare or absent in the screen-washed residues that we picked by hand. The columnals of the mesistele and dististele have synarthrial articulations with a central ligamentary fossa that has a figure-8 shape. The fulcral ridges change orientation from one joint to the next, giving the columnals a twisted appearance ( Fig. 2E–F View FIGURE 2 ). Most rhizocrinids are fixed by rhizoids developed from the distal part of the stalk (dististele). In the fauna described here, the columnal characters do not allow a clear distinction between the different genera. The external morphology of juvenile aboral cups occasionally shows clear, discriminating characters, which tend to disappear later during growth by morphological convergence (homoplasy; for example, see Fig. 14A–I View FIGURE 14 ). The abundance of material from some outcrops has allowed the recognition of juveniles and the reconstitution of ontogenic trajectories that have proved instrumental in clarifying the taxonomy (see Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 , for example).
Stratigraphical distribution. Campanian-Recent.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |