Leptagonia franca, Mottequin & Simon, 2017

Mottequin, Bernard & Simon, Eric, 2017, New insights on Tournaisian-Visean (Carboniferous, Mississippian) athyridide, orthotetide, rhynchonellide, and strophomenide brachiopods from southern Belgium, Palaeontologia Electronica 37 (3), pp. 1-45 : 6-11

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.26879/758

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8541AA1E-F9DE-4079-AE09-918FFF61ADC1

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/27FA86CF-03F3-456B-9667-C89DB981FE3E

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:27FA86CF-03F3-456B-9667-C89DB981FE3E

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Leptagonia franca
status

sp. nov.

Leptagonia franca sp. nov.

Figures 4-8 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 , Table 1

zoobank.org/ 27FA86CF-03F3-456B-9667-C89DB981FE3E

p 1843 Leptaena depressa ; de Koninck, p. 215, pl. 13, fig. 6a-c (labelled Leptaena depressa var. analoga Sowerby in the plate legend).

p 1851 Leptaena analoga ; de Koninck, p. 653.

p 1868 Strophomena (Producta) analoga ; Dewalque, p. 333.

p 1881 Strophomenes (Producta) analoga ; Mourlon, p. 47.

v 1933 Leptaena analoga ; Maillieux, p. 92.

v 1934 Leptaena analoga (Phillips) ; Demanet, p. 61, text-figs. 11-14, pl. 5, figs. 1-14.

1950 Leptaena analoga Wilckens (sic); Termier and Termier, pl. 82, figs. 19-20.

p 1958 Leptaena analoga (Phillips) ; Demanet, p. 123, 126, 130.

p 1969 Leptaena analoga (Phill.) ; Mortelmans, p. 31 (only those from the Tournai Formation).

v 2017 Leptagonia sp. indet.; Mottequin and Simon, fig. 12d.

Etymology. From francus, a, um (Latin: of or belonging to the Franks, Frank), in reference to the rich Frank history of the town of Tournai.

Holotype. RBINS a5891 ( Demanet, 1934, pl. 5, fig. 1) from Tournai (Tournai Formation) ( Figure 5.1-6 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 ).

Paratypes. RBINS specimens from Tournai (Tournai Formation) illustrated by Demanet (1934) a5829 (pl. 1, fig. 30) ( Figure 6.1-6 View FIGURE 6 ), a5892 (pl. 5, fig. 2) ( Figure 5.7-12 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9. 1-4 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 12 ), a5893 (pl. 5, fig. 3), a5894 (pl. 5, fig. 4), a5895 (pl. 5, fig. 5) ( Figure. 6.7-12 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9. 1-4 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 12 ), a5896 (pl. 5, fig. 6) ( Figure 7.1 View FIGURE 7 ), a5897 (pl. 5, fig. 7) ( Figure 7.10-13 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9. 1-4 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 ), a5898 (pl. 5, fig. 8), a5899 (pl. 5, fig. 9) ( Figure 7.9 View FIGURE 7 ), a5902 (pl. 5, fig. 12) ( Figure 7.4-5 View FIGURE 7 ), a5903 (pl. 5, fig. 13) ( Figure 7.8 View FIGURE 7 ), a5904 (pl. 5, fig. 14), a5905 (text-fig. 11), a5906 (text-fig. 13), a5907 (text-fig. 14) and herein a13099 ( Figure 5.13-18 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9. 1-4 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 ), a13100 ( Figure 6.13-17 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9. 1-4 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 ), 13101 ( Figure 6.18-22 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9. 1-4 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 View FIGURE 20 View FIGURE 21 View FIGURE 22 ), a13102 ( Figure 6.23-27 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9. 1-4 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 View FIGURE 20 View FIGURE 21 View FIGURE 22 View FIGURE 23. 1-7 View FIGURE 24 View FIGURE 25 View FIGURE 26 View FIGURE 27 ), a13103 ( Figure 7.2 View FIGURE 7 ), a13104 ( Figure 7.6-7 View FIGURE 7 ) .

Additional material. RBINS: two ventral valves and 27 articulated specimens.

Type locality. Tournai area ( Figures 2-3 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 ), southern Belgium.

Type stratum. Tournai Formation, Tournaisian ( Figure 4 View FIGURE 4 ).

Diagnosis. Shell large (up to 70 mm in width), with a subtrapezoidal to subrectangular outline in juveniles, but transversally subrectangular in mature specimens; cardinal extremities slightly mucronate in juveniles, but becoming acute to subrounded (due to development of lamellose shelly expansions) in mature specimens. Shell parvicostellate and rugate, with 11–15 costae in 5 mm at 10 mm from the dorsal umbo; 15–22 rugae on ventral disc. Ventral muscle field subdiamond-shaped, raised anterolaterally, and anteriorly on a low pseudospondylium. Dorsal muscle platform raised above valve floor extending to about half length of the disc; dental sockets deep, well-defined; socket plates strongly divergent; dorsal marginal ridge well developed, with numerous mantle canals developed anteriorly and antero-laterally to it.

Description. Shell large (up to 70 mm in width), markedly wider than long, widest at hinge line in juveniles or posteriorly to hinge line in mature specimens, concavoconvex in lateral profile with sharp, dorsally directed geniculation, with a subtrapezoidal to subrectangular outline in juveniles, but transversally subrectangular in mature specimens; anterior commissure rectimarginate; anterior margin slightly rounded or emarginate; cardinal extremities slightly mucronate in juveniles, but becoming acute to subrounded (due to development of lamellose shelly expansions) in mature specimens.

Ventral visceral disc shorter than trail in mature specimens, moderately convex longitudinally and transversally, subtrapezoidal in outline; umbo small; beak short; interarea low, striated parallel to hinge, apsacline to almost orthocline, weakly concave; apical foramen small ( Figure 7.1- 3 View FIGURE 7 ); delthyrium broad, triangular, closed apically by a convex, striated pseudodeltidium; median depression developed anteriorly to geniculation in mature specimens.

Dorsal visceral disc flat longitudinally and transversally; trail shorter than disc; interarea clearly less developed than the ventral one, flat, apsacline, divided by convex, striated, medially grooved chilidium ( Figure 7.1-3 View FIGURE 7 ).

Shell parvicostellate and rugate, with 11–15 costae (n=8) in 5 mm at 10 mm from the dorsal umbo. Between 15 and 22 rugae on ventral disc; prominent on both discs and absent on trails.

Ventral interior ( Figure 7.4-8 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 ) with small teeth, supported by short dental plates; muscle field subdiamond-shaped, raised anterolaterally and anteriorly on a low pseudospondylium; diductor scars large, fan-shaped, radially striated; adductor scars separating the diductors, raised on a prominent median ridge widening anteriorly and divided by a thin myophragm; base of the adductor ridge extends slightly anterior to the pseudospondylium as a rounded buttress onto valve floor; mantle canals not observed.

Dorsal interior ( Figure 7.9-13 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9. 1-4 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 ) with stout, ventrolaterally oriented cardinal process lobes; muscle platform raised above the valve floor; cardinal process pit developed between the cardinal process lobes and the posterior margin of the muscle platform; posterior adductor scars more or less circular and separated by a median ridge terminating close to their anterior end, but variably developed among the examined material; anterior adductor scars markedly smaller and separated by a slender septum continuing anteriorly for a variable distance in front of the muscle platform and reaching its maximum height at the junction of the lateral ridges bounding the former, then decreasing rapidly towards the anterior margin; dental sockets deep, well-defined; socket plates diverging at an angle of 142–159 degrees (n=2); outer surface of the marginal ridge including numerous traces of mantle canals; tubercles abundant, but variably developed following the specimens (compare Figure 7.9 and 7.11 View FIGURE 7 ).

Dimensions ( Figure 8 View FIGURE 8 , Table 1). The number of specimens measured is rather low due to lack of well-preserved material. For this reason, the mean value is given without standard error. Nonetheless, the unrolled ventral trail length/unrolled ventral disc length and unrolled dorsal trail length/unrolled dorsal disc length ratios analysed here show that an interrelation is probable.

interarea.

Remarks. Until recently, Tournaisian leptaenines from Western Europe, but not only (see Bahrammanesh et al. (2011) for a non-exhaustive list of references), were identified as Leptagonia analoga ( Phillips, 1836) , whose lectotype was selected and illustrated by Brunton (1968) as subsequently did Brand (1972) and Cocks and Rong (2000). Phillips’ species was described with great detail by Brunton (1968), Brand (1972), and Harper and Jeffrey (1996). As rightly proposed by Bassett and Bryant (2006), several features such as the outline of the muscular field could be used to discriminate all the forms identified as L. analoga , an opinion subsequently followed by Mottequin (2010) and Bahrammanesh et al. (2011). In order to concretise this point of view, a new large-sized species is here erected on the basis of the well-preserved material from the Tournai area, formerly illustrated by Demanet (1934). Leptagonia franca sp. nov. differs from L. analoga by its less elongate ventral disc, its more developed ventral trail, and its more inflated shell. Furthermore, its ornamentation is slightly coarser than in the latter and its ventral muscle field is subdiamond-shaped. Except the radial ornamentation, which is similar in both species, the same features plus a markedly distinct dorsal internal morphology are used to discriminate L. franca and L. caledonica Brand, 1972 . Due to its distinctive external and internal features, L. franca cannot be confused with L. simorini (Sokolskaya in Sarytcheva et al., 1963) and L. smithi Brand, 1972 . The new species differs from L. convexa ( Weller, 1914) notably in its less elongate ventral disc and its more developed ventral trails. Leptagonia franca is clearly larger and has a coarser radial ornamentation than L. missouriensis Carter, 1968 . Sanders (in Easton et al., 1958) erected Leptaena cooperi from the Represso Limestone of Sonora ( Mexico), on the basis of a few incomplete specimens (see Carter, 1987), that he compared with the Belgian material illustrated by Demanet (1934). Indubitably, the internal morphology of both species is identical except some differences noted by Sanders (in Easton et al., 1958), such as the outline of the visceral disc (slightly more than semi-elliptical in L. franca vs. nearly completely elliptical in L. cooperi ). Further material is however required to better describe the poorly known Mexican species.

Occurrence. Until now, Leptagonia franca is mainly known from the Tournai Formation in the eponymous area but also occurs in the Tournaisian succession of the Dinant Synclinorium, as evidenced by the specimens illustrated by Demanet (1934, pl. 5, figs. 10, 11) from the Hastarian Pont d’Arcole Formation. Its precise distribution in the Tournaisian succession would require a detailed survey of the complete Tournaisian succession, which is well beyond the scope of this paper. However, Demanet (1923, pl. 5, fig. 8) illustrated a ventral valve identified as Strophomena analoga from the Waulsort Formation at Sosoye in the Dinant sedimentation area ( Figures 2-4 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 ). This specimen (RBINS a11747) characterized by its flat visceral disc and thin radial ornamentation (17 ribs per 5 mm at 10 mm from the umbo; 22 rugae) is re-illustrated herein ( Figure 9.1-4 View FIGURE 9. 1-4 ) and left provisionally in open nomenclature due to the absence of additional material, and is thus identified as Leptagonia sp. indet.

RBINS

Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF