Leptagonia cf. caledonica Brand, 1972
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26879/758 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8541AA1E-F9DE-4079-AE09-918FFF61ADC1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03818787-FFC7-FF85-28CB-8CCBFABA6F7F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Leptagonia cf. caledonica Brand, 1972 |
status |
|
Leptagonia cf. caledonica Brand, 1972
Figures 4 View FIGURE 4 , 9.5-26, 10 View FIGURE 9. 1-4 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 View FIGURE 20 View FIGURE 21 View FIGURE 22 View FIGURE 23. 1-7 View FIGURE 24 View FIGURE 25 View FIGURE 26 -11
p 1843 Leptaena depressa Sowerby ; de Koninck, p. 215, pl. 12, figs. 3, 5 (?), 6.
p 1851 Leptaena analoga ; de Koninck, p. 653.
p 1868 Strophomena (Producta) analoga ; Dewalque, p. 333.
p 1881 Strophomenes (Producta) analoga ; Mourlon, p. 47.
v 1934 Leptaena sinuata de Koninck ; Demanet, p. 74, pl. 6, figs. 6-7.
cf.* 1972 Leptagonia caledonica sp. nov. Brand,
p. 61, text-figs. 1d, 2-3, pl. 9, figs. 1-7. Leptagonia cf. caledonica Brand, 1972 from Visé, Visé Formation (Visean, Warnantian). 1-4, ULg.PA. 2016.12.25 /7, distorted, articulated internal mould in ventral view and detail of the latex mould of the muscular platform in three different views. Scale bar equals 5 mm (1), 2.5 mm (2-4).
Material. RBINS: besides the specimens RBINS a5914 ( Figure 9.10-14 View FIGURE 9. 1-4 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 )–5915 ( Figure 9.5-9 View FIGURE 9. 1-4 ) illustrated by Demanet (1934 pl. 6, figs. 6-7), the studied material includes four ventral valves and 30 articulated specimens; ULg.PA: five ventral and two dorsal valves, and 54 articulated specimens. Due to the deficient preservation (e.g., trails and cardinal extremities broken), despite the great number of specimens available, it was not possible to perform statistics.
Description. Shell medium-sized (up to ca. 38.7 mm in width), subrectangular in outline with ears developed (exceptionally preserved), wider than long, concavo-convex, resupinate; widest at hinge line; trail development unknown (exceptionally and incompletely preserved); anterior margin emarginate.
Ventral disc slightly convex in posterior and lateral view or flattened, roughly semi-circular to semi-elliptic in outline; posterior margin rectilinear, slightly broken by small umbo; sulcus round-bottomed, deep, only affecting the trail; interarea flat, low, apsacline; delthyrium closed apically by convex pseudodeltidium.
Dorsal disc convex, but with posterior part flattened in lateral view, roughly semi-circular to semi-elliptic in outline; ears flattened; in some specimens, presence of a shallow and poorly defined median depression originating in posterior part of the disc, reaching the geniculation; interarea linear, flat, catacline.
Shell parvicostellate and rugate, with 8–13 costae (n=10) in 5 mm at 10 mm from the umbones. Circa 13–16 (n=3) relatively regular rugae on ventral disc (probably a little bit more as, in most of the specimens, the umbo is blunt); rugae prominent on both discs and absent on trails.
Ventral interior ( Figures 10-1-15 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9. 1-4 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 , 11) with large, subdiamond-shaped muscle field, raised anteriorly and anterolaterally on a low pseudospondylium; teeth not observed; diductor scars large, with poorly preserved radial striation; adductor scars separating the diductors, raised on a prominent median ridge widening anteriorly; base of the adductor ridge extending slightly anteriorly to the pseudospondylium as a rounded buttress onto valve floor; numerous tubercles concentrated in posterior part of the valve floor around the pseudospondylium, and also present on the rest of the valve, although less abundantly developed; mantle canals well developed (but insufficiently preserved for complete description).
Dorsal interior ( Figure 10 View FIGURE 10 ) with stout cardinal process lobes (cardinal process pit present directly antero-medial to them); muscle platform with anterior part strongly raised above valve floor; posterior adductor scars semi-circular, separated by deep median groove from which a median septum extends anteriorly; anterior portion of muscle platform consisting of two depressions separated by the septum reaching its maximum at the junction of the lateral ridges bounding these oval depressions; numerous tubercles concentrated in posterior part of the valve floor around the muscle platform and less abundantly developed on the rest of the valve,; mantle canals well developed (but insufficiently preserved for complete description).
Remarks. Demanet (1934, pl. 6, figs. 6, 7) illustrated two specimens from the Visean of Visé, which are re-illustrated here ( Figure 9.5–14 View FIGURE 9. 1-4 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 ), that he assigned to the productide Sinuatella sinuata ( de Koninck, 1851) , which undoubtedly belong to Leptagonia by their external features (see discussion related to de Koninck’s species of, e.g., Muir-Wood and Cooper [1960] and Brunton and Mundy [1988]). Brand (1972) tentatively assigned the specimen RBINS a5915 ( Demanet, 1934, pl. 6, fig. 7) to his new species Leptagonia smithi . After examination of numerous specimens, it appears that the material from Visé cannot be assigned to L. smithi Brand, 1972 as it is characterized by the development of ears (rarely preserved in the investigated material), the largeness of the tuberculate areas and especially by the markedly greater development of the dorsal muscle platform (compare with Brand, 1972, text-fig. 3, pl. 11, fig. 6). From the viewpoint of the internal and external morphology, the Belgian material is comparable to L. caledonica , except its ornamentation, which is coarser: 8–13 versus 10–16 costae in 5 mm at 10 mm from the umbones according to Brand (1972). Nonetheless, although the available material is abundant, its relatively poor state of preservation (most of the specimens are devoid of trails and ears) does not allow a more confident identification; that is why it is doubtfully assigned to Brand’s (1972) species.
Occurrence. The Belgian material originates from Visé (Visé Formation, Visean), whereas Leptagonia caledonica seems to be confined to the British Visean and Serpukhovian according to Brand (1972, 2011) and Brunton and Tilsley (1991).
RBINS |
Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.