Schellwienella radialiformis Demanet, 1934

Mottequin, Bernard & Simon, Eric, 2017, New insights on Tournaisian-Visean (Carboniferous, Mississippian) athyridide, orthotetide, rhynchonellide, and strophomenide brachiopods from southern Belgium, Palaeontologia Electronica 37 (3), pp. 1-45 : 15-19

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.26879/758

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8541AA1E-F9DE-4079-AE09-918FFF61ADC1

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03818787-FFC3-FF99-282F-8CCCFF1C6DBF

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Schellwienella radialiformis Demanet, 1934
status

 

Schellwienella radialiformis Demanet, 1934

Figures 4 View FIGURE 4 , 12-14 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14

v* 1934 Schellwienella aspis mut. radialiformis nov. mut. Demanet, p. 85, pl. 7, figs. 6- 12.

v 1934 Schellwienella sp. ; Demanet, p. 81, text-fig. 15, pl. 7, fig. 3.

non 1954 Schellwienella (subgen. nov. Carlospina) radialiformis Demanet ; Reed, p. 183, pl. 3, fig. 21.

v 1958 Schellwienella aspis radialiformis Demanet ; Demanet, p. 126.

1969 Schellwienella aspis radialiformis Demanet ; Mortelmans, p. 31.

Type material. Demanet (1934) considered all the illustrated specimens as paratypes according to the legend of his plate 7. The articulated specimen RBINS a5930 ( Demanet, 1934, pl. 7, fig. 12; Figure 12.16-20 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 View FIGURE 20 ) is selected here as the lectotype whereas the other RBINS specimens illustrated by Demanet (1934, pl. 7, figs. 6-11), namely a5924 ( Figures 12.1-5 View FIGURE 12 , 13.11-12 View FIGURE 13 ), a5925 ( Figure 13.14- 17 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 ), a5926 ( Figure 12.21-25 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 View FIGURE 20 View FIGURE 21 View FIGURE 22 View FIGURE 23. 1-7 View FIGURE 24 View FIGURE 25 ), a5927 ( Figure 13.1- 5 View FIGURE 13 ), a5928 ( Figures 12.6-10 View FIGURE 12 , 13.13 View FIGURE 13 ) and a5929 ( Figure 12.11-15 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 ), are considered as paralectotypes and fully illustrated herein.

Additional material. Two ventral and two dorsal valves, and ten articulated specimens.

Description. Shell large-sized (up to ca. 51 mm in width), wider than long, quadrate to subquadrate in outline, slightly mucronate, strongly dorsibiconvex to resupinate, widest at hinge (juveniles) or anteriorly to it (adults); anterior margin rounded; anterior commissure rectimarginate to slightly uniplicate.

Ventral valve posteriorly convex then becoming concave anteriorly (resupinate shell) or rarely slightly convex (dorsibiconvex shell); umbo small; interarea triangular, high, flat to slightly concave, catacline to anacline; pseudodeltidium convex and perideltidium flat ( Figure 13.11, 13.17 View FIGURE 13 ); median depression rarely developed and occurring in anterior part of valve; koskinoid perforations developed in umbonal area ( Figure 13.12 View FIGURE 13 ).

Dorsal valve convex with maximum height located at midvalve or posteriorly and then decreasing rapidly towards anterior commissure; posterolateral areas flattened in posterior view; interarea linear, flat, anacline; chilidium convex.

Ornamentation parvicostellate; in some specimens, costellae can thicken so much that they become as large as the costae at the anterior margin; at front, 7–11 costae and costellae per 5 mm; growth lamellae numerous irregularly spaced, more crowded near margins in adults; filae fine, forming minute ridges across the crests of the costae and costellae (ca. 14 per 1 mm) ( Figure 13.12- 13 View FIGURE 13 ).

Ventral interior ( Figures 12.11 View FIGURE 12 , 13.1, 13.15-17 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 ) with large and deep delthyrial cavity; lateral apical cavities not filled in; dental plates strongly divergent anteriorly (78–93 degrees [n=4]), enclosing the posterior half of the muscle field; teeth large; muscle field slightly impressed, flabellate, slightly wider than long, extending up to 38 percent of the valve length; adductor muscles bounded laterally by two very low slightly curved ridges (but not fusing) and divided by a slender and low myophragm not extending beyond the distal extremities of the lateral ridges; diductor field large, flabellate, entirely enclosing the adductor field and anteriorly limited by a low ridge.

Dorsal interior ( Figures 13.2, 13.20, 13.22-24, 14.3-4 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 View FIGURE 20 View FIGURE 21 View FIGURE 22 View FIGURE 23. 1-7 View FIGURE 24 ) with socket ridges divergent at 90 degrees (n=1!) from another and only slightly curved, fused to cardinal process lobes; sockets deep, round-bottomed and laterally bounded by valve floor; cardinal process lobes high, posteroventrally oriented, grooved posteriorly; muscle field longer than wide, extending up to 35 percent of the unrolled length of the valve; adductor scars oval, posteriorly defined by plates extending from socket ridges, and clearly separated by a median ridge.

Remarks. Demanet (1934) considered the specimens from Tournai as a mutation of Schellwienella aspis Smyth (1930) from the Tournaisian Hook Head Formation of southern Ireland (see Bassett and Bryant, 2006; Mottequin, 2010). According to the article 45.6.4 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (1999), the epithet radialiformis has to be considered as of subspecific rank in Demanet’s (1934) publication. The species was promoted to a specific level by Reed (1954) and included in Schellwienella (Carlospina) Reed, 1954 , a subgenus considered as a synonym of Schellwienella by Williams (1965) and Williams and Brunton (2000). Schellwienella radialiformis Demanet, 1934 differs from S. radialis ( Phillips, 1836) , as revised by Brunton (1968), by its less strongly parvicostellate ornamentation (the primary costae are generally less pronounced), and its ventral muscle field has a markedly different outline (compare with Davidson 1861, pl. 25, fig. 17). Schellwienella radialiformis differs from S. aspis Smyth, 1930 by its parvicostellate ornamentation and its undulose to uniplicate anterior commissure. Demanet’s (1934) species is distinguished from S. cheuma Bassett and Bryant, 2006 notably in its parviclostellate ornamentation, its more convex pseudodeltidium, and its subrounded ventral muscle field.

Demanet (1934, text-fig. 15, pl. 7, fig. 3) illustrated the specimen RBINS a5921 that he considered as a ‘forme spéciale dérivant de Schellwienella ’ as it displays some structures observed on the ventral interarea which he interpreted as hinge denticles ( Figure 14.5 View FIGURE 14 ). These structures, resulting from the intersection of the vertical and horizontal ornamentation of the ventral interarea, simply result from repetitive interruptions of the shell growth.

Occurrence. Schellwienella radialiformis is known from the Tournai Formation in the eponymous area.

RBINS

Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF