Vulpes vulpes Linnaeus, 1758
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/g2015n2a5 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0117CBA4-4CE0-4431-B5F6-721F998C72C7 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038087D7-FFED-FF91-FC20-FEB8FD7F3649 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Vulpes vulpes Linnaeus, 1758 |
status |
|
Vulpes vulpes Linnaeus, 1758 View in CoL
MATERIAL EXAMINED. — NISP =13; MNI =5.
1842 sample: 2 left humeri; 1 right tibia; 1 left tibia.
1989-1992 sample: 2 right c; 1 right mandible; 2 left mandibles; 1 left ulna; 1 left metacarpal II; 1 right calcaneus; 1 left metatarsal V.
DESCRIPTION
Among the small canids remains (n=76), some of them have been associated to the red fox Vulpes vulpes (n=13) corresponding to five adults. The low number of elements determined at species level is related both to the state of conservation of the material and to the difficulties to distinguish Vulpes and Alopex Kaup, 1829 . The red fox is a small common carnivore in Pleistocene bone assemblages (e.g., Gönnersdorf in Poplin 1976; Gerde in Clot 1980). This predator is ubiquitous and well-represented during different Pleistocene glacial and interglacial climatic phases. In France, the red fox is found at Nauterie II (layer 11: Mindel-Riss), at Montmaurin-la-Niche, Nestier, and Gerde (Riss); it then cooccurs with the arctic fox Alopex lagopus (Linnaeus, 1758) throughout Würmian times, before it becomes a common carnivore during Holocene times ( Clot & Duranthon 1990). Morphometrical similarities and potential co-occurrence of red and arctic foxes during the Oxygen Isotopic Stage 3 (OIS3; Cohen & Gibbard 2011) necessitate performing a careful analysis of the bone material. At Fouvent, cranial and dental elements are represented by a left mandibular branch with p2-m2, a fragment of left mandible with m1 and m2, and a broken right mandible with m1 and m2 with two canines. As regards the red fox, according to Poplin (1976), the lower canines are longer and thinner in comparison with isatis. At Gerde, Clot (1980) also pointed out the great difficulty to make the distinction between Vulpes and Alopex but determined the canines of fox based on their general proportions. We attributed the material of Fouvent to the red fox on the base of the concerned morphometrical data. Our three m1s (G8.B.509b, D11.E.3 and G8.B.507) leave no doubt for their specific assignment. Their large dimensions (respectively B = 6.4-6-6 with L = 16- 16-16) match perfectly those of red foxes as provided at Gerde ( Clot 1980: table 49) and at Gönnersdorf ( Poplin 1976: 48 fig. 28). Postcranial elements of red fox include two humeri, one ulna, one metacarpal II, two tibiae, one calcaneus and one metatarsal V. The measurements are summarized in Table 2. According to Altuna (2004), the breadth of the distal humerus of the red fox ranges between 17.2 and 23.8 mm while Clot (1980) gives an interval comprised between 19.2 and 22 mm. According to these studies, the distal breadth of isatis is not greater than 19.5 mm, consequently the humerus of Fouvent (1842.118) is quite similar in size to the red fox. Published metric data available for the ulna are rare but the dimensions of the specimen of Fouvent suggest without no doubt an attribution to Vulpes .
The total length (47 mm) of the left metacarpal II(G8.A/B.165) of Fouvent is larger in comparison to the measurements of red fox ( Altuna 2004). However, the left metacarpal falls into
A
sin, left; dext, right. Other abbreviations: see text.
the variation range as provided by Clot (1980) for Pleistocene populations of Vulpes . The same is true for the measurements of both a proximal and a distal tibiae (respectively n°1842.119 and 1842.92) that we also assigned to the red fox.
In the Table 3, the maximum length (56 mm) of the left metatarsal V (F9.B.135) is roughly similar to the mean value observed in living foxes ( Altuna 2004) corresponding to their smaller pleistocene representatives ( Clot1980).We observed the same thing with the maximum length of the calcaneus G8.E.26 (only 29 mm) that could be associated to a small red fox, while populations of isatis only reach a maximum of 28.4 mm.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.