Pseudestoloides costaricensis Breuning and Heyrovsky, 1961
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4375.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:557EA161-F356-4536-A0E0-34AF7A102234 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5976788 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0380274E-FB0D-3E1D-FCD1-2F8316C0FC55 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pseudestoloides costaricensis Breuning and Heyrovsky, 1961 |
status |
|
On Pseudestoloides costaricensis Breuning and Heyrovsky, 1961 View in CoL and Pseudestoloides affinis Martins and
Galileo, 2009
According to Breuning and Heyrovsky (1961) the holotype of Pseudestoloides costaricensis belonged to Heyrovsky’s collection. Currently, this collection is deposited in the NMPC collection. However, according to Jiří Hájek, curator of the collection (personal communication), the holotype is not there. We tried to find it in several museums, but without success. Breuning (1974a: fig. 7) figured a specimen as being P. costaricensis . However, the elytral apex is not as described in the original description or redescription, and the antennomeres are light pubescent also, unlike the description.
Martins and Galileo (2009) described P. affinis and compared it with P. costaricensis (translated): “ P. affinis sp. nov. is similar to P. costaricensis , however has scape with notable projection on inner apex, a feature that was not mentioned in the redescription of the genus ( Breuning, 1974a: 80). Furthermore, according to the description of P. costaricensis , the head have long setae; the elytra are widely truncate at apex, with outer angle projected, but obtuse, and the elytra have a few punctures surrounded by small black circle. In P. affinis , the head did not show notable long setae; the elytra are spiniform at outer angle, and the black circle on elytra are more abundant.” Actually, although the holotype does not show distinct setae on head, they are present in the paratype ( Figs. 45–49 View FIGURES45–54 ). It is possible that the female present in the MZSP collection ( Figs. 50–54 View FIGURES45–54 ) identified as P. costaricensis is a female of P. affinis . However, it is not possible to know if P. affinis is really different from P. costaricensis without examining the holotype.
Material examined. COSTA RICA, Puntarenas: R. B. Monteverde ( Est. La Casona , 1520 m), paratype male, 5–19.XI.1994, K. Martinez col. ( MZSP). Heredia:
Est. Biol. la Selva (50–150 m, 10º26'N / 84º01'W), 1 female, IX.1999, INBio-OET col. ( MZSP). GoogleMaps
MZSP |
Sao Paulo, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |