Leehelea Debenham
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3879.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6423894B-97D9-4286-ABB9-D4AF072B57FD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5593055 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/027587C9-BD71-3016-FD64-19514C2BE776 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Leehelea Debenham |
status |
|
( Figs. 28A View FIGURE 28 , 31B View FIGURE 31 , 40C View FIGURE 40 , 46C–D View FIGURE 46 , 53A View FIGURE 53 , 68C View FIGURE 68 , 77B View FIGURE 77 )
DIAGNOSIS: Only pupa of Ceratopogonidae with the abdominal tubercles all apically pointed ( Fig. 68C View FIGURE 68 ), abdominal segment 4 with D-8-IV and D-9-IV on basally fused tubercles ( Fig. 68C View FIGURE 68 ) and abdominal segment 8 with the two ventral sensilla (V-5-VIII, V-6-VIII) on a single tubercle and V-5-VIII tiny and V-6-VIII elongate; not diagnosable as different from Sphaeromias .
DESCRIPTION: Total length = 6.50–6.97 mm. Without larval exuviae retained on abdomen. Exuviae with flagellum appressed against lateral margin of midleg, wing (as in Figs. 16B View FIGURE 16 , 33B View FIGURE 33 ). Ecdysial tear around base of antenna, along lateral margin of face to palpus (as in Figs. 17C View FIGURE 17 , 79H View FIGURE 79 ). Head: Dorsal apotome (as in Fig. 22A View FIGURE 22 ), with ventral line of weakness, without dorsomedial tubercle, without central dome; dorsolateral cephalic sclerite (as in Fig. 13H View FIGURE 13 ) fused to scutum, each side separated medially by dorsal apotome in whole pupa; mouthparts ( Fig. 28A View FIGURE 28 ) with mandible well-developed, lacinia absent; palpus extending equal to or just posterior to posterolateral margin of labium; labium entire (not divided medially); apex of antenna ( Fig. 40C View FIGURE 40 ) anterior to posterior extent of midlength portion of midleg (portion lateral to mesosternum), narrowed posteriorly; sensilla: dorsal apotomals (as in Fig. 22A View FIGURE 22 )—uncertain; dorsolateral cephalic sclerite sensilla—1 seta, 1 campaniform sensillum; clypeal-labrals ( Fig. 28A View FIGURE 28 )—2 slender setae; oculars ( Fig. 28A View FIGURE 28 )—2 setae, 1 campaniform sensillum. Thorax: Prothoracic extension ( Fig. 28A View FIGURE 28 ) wide, well-developed but narrow dorsolaterally, not extending to antenna; mesonotum with very short tubercles, not extending posteromedially, not dividing metathorax medially ( Fig. 53A View FIGURE 53 ); respiratory organ ( Figs. 46C–D View FIGURE 46 ) length/width = 3.39–4.08, elongate, moderately slender, somewhat flattened apically, with pores closely abutting at apex of respiratory organ, arranged in single row, outer surface with some wrinkles, with short, wide pedicel, base with elongate posteromedial apodeme, membranous base of respiratory organ moderately elongate, annulated, tracheal tube straight to slightly curved along length, with spirals restricted to base, wrinkles to half length; wing ( Fig. 40C View FIGURE 40 ) without apical tubercle or angle, separated medially by fore-, midlegs; halter apex and hind leg (similar to Fig. 33J View FIGURE 33 ) broadly abutting; halter apex extending posteriorly to 1/4 length of tergite 2; legs ( Fig. 40C View FIGURE 40 ) with lateral margin of foreleg near midlength of wing slightly angled; hind leg visible at lateral margin of wing (as in Fig. 33I View FIGURE 33 ); female with apex of foreleg ventral to apex of midleg; apex of hind leg abutting apex of midleg laterally; sensilla: anteromedials—2 elongate setae (as in Figs. 31L–M View FIGURE 31 ); anterolaterals—1 moderately long seta; dorsal setae ( Fig. 31B View FIGURE 31 )—D-1-T, D-2-T, D-4-T, D-5-T setae, D-3-T campaniform sensillum, D-3-T anterolateral to D-4-T; supraalar 2—campaniform sensillum; metathoracics ( Fig. 53A View FIGURE 53 )—1 campaniform sensillum; M-3-T distant from margin of metathorax (at least 1/3 length of metathorax). Abdomen: with tergite 1 with 1 medial spot, tergites 2–7 with medial area with stripe, 2 anterolateral spots, 2 pairs on tergite 8, sternites 3–7 with medial stripe, anterolateral spot, 2 spots on sternite 8, segment 2 as wide or slightly wider than segment 3, segments with undivided, thin to thick setae, with pointed, short to moderately elongate tubercles, tergites or sternites entire, each without membranous disc; segment 9 ( Fig. 77B View FIGURE 77 ) not strongly modified, terminal processes closely approximated basally, each projecting posterodorsolaterally, tapering to pointed apex; sensilla: tergite 1 ( Fig. 53A View FIGURE 53 ) with 8 setae, 2 campaniform sensilla, including 3 lateral sensilla, D-2-I, D-3-I closely approximated, D-7-I situated anteriorly near D-3-I; segment 4 ( Fig. 68C View FIGURE 68 )—D-2-IV, D-3-IV short to moderately elongate setae on pointed tubercles; D-5-IV, D-8-IV, D-9-IV short to moderately elongate setae; D-5-IV on single tubercle, D-8-IV, D-9-IV on basally fused, closely approximated tubercles, posterior dorsal sensilla in transverse row, arranged medially to laterally: D-5-IV, D-4-IV, D-8-IV, D-9-IV; D-7-IV near D-3-IV; L-1-IV elongate seta from surface, moderately anterior of posterior lateral setae; L-2-IV, L-3-IV, L-4-IV short on pointed tubercles, V-5-IV, V-6-IV, V-7-IV short setae on short tubercles, all closely approximated, V-5-IV, V-6-IV with tubercles fused basally; segment 8 without D-3-VIII, without L-1-VIII; with V-5-VIII, V-6-VIII on single tubercle, V-5-VIII tiny, V-6-VIII elongate; segment 9 ( Fig. 77B View FIGURE 77 )—with D-5-IX, D-6-IX campaniform sensilla.
DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT: The genus Leehelea is known from nine species in the Oriental and Australasian Regions ( Borkent 2014 ). Pupae have been found in sand from a river margin and from a lily pond.
TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION: The pupae of two species of Leehelea are known ( Tables 2–3 View TABLE 2 View TABLE 3 ). Male and female pupae of Homohelea and Sphaeromias , two genera closely related to Leehelea , are sexually dimorphic in the arrangement of their forelegs. In males, the foreleg is relatively short ( Figs. 40A, D View FIGURE 40 ) while in females the foreleg overlaps the midleg entirely ( Figs. 40B, E View FIGURE 40 ). Only female pupae of Leehelea are known ( Fig. 40C View FIGURE 40 ) and it is likely that the males, once discovered, will share this dimorphism (see character 44).
The dorsal apotome of one specimen was present but at too great an angle to illustrate. Seta DA-A-1 could not be seen but was likely broken off (considering that all Ceratopogonidae other than some Forcipomyia have a seta present). Overall, the shape of the dorsal apotome appeared similar to that of Sphaeromias longipennis .
Debenham (1974) noted that the pupae of Leehelea were similar to those of Sphaeromias and neither could I find any differences between the two of any significance. Considering these strong similarities, the validity of recognizing the two genera should be reconsidered. Regarding the differences given by Debenham (1974), Sphaeromias may be paraphyletic in relation to Leehelea . They are separated primarily on the basis of a single difference in the shape of the female claw (presence or absence of an inner tooth and their length) and degree of fusion of the male parameres. Further differences seem to me to be minor (size of leg setae and their bases) or invalid (the brush on the ventral surface of Ta 4 is present in at least S. longipennis ). Nandi et al. (2012) lists other differences but at least most apply to both genera.
Elson-Harris (1987) keyed the pupae of the two Australian species, L. hispida and L. wasselli .
MATERIAL EXAMINED: L. hispida : 1 pupal exuviae, Nepean River, Menangle, New South Wales, Australia, 9-XII-1968 (ANIC). L. wasselli : 1 pupal exuviae, Roper River Mission, Northern Territory, Australia, 8- XI-1956 (ANIC).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |