Vaejovis sprousei Sissom, 1990
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4596.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B88EA161-04D3-4D50-B3FD-E98A60DA3740 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/022787FE-FFEC-1909-FF16-3AE0FB9AFE13 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Vaejovis sprousei Sissom, 1990 |
status |
|
Vaejovis sprousei Sissom, 1990 View in CoL
Figures 4 View FIGURE 4 , 35i View FIGURE 35 , 36i View FIGURE 36 , 37i View FIGURE 37 , 38i View FIGURE 38 , 39i View FIGURE 39 , 41i View FIGURE 41 , 49 View FIGURE 49
Vaejovis sprousei Sissom, 1990: 48 View in CoL , 51–53, Fig: 3A–G.
Vaejovis sprousei: Kovarík, 1998: 148 View in CoL ; Beutelspacher, 2000: 110, 143, 147, 154, map 90; Sissom, 2000: 543; González- Santillán et al., 2004: 9 –11, figs. 1–5; Jarvis et al. 2005: 207, 210; Sissom & Hendrixson, 2005: 34, 41; Graham & Fet, 2006: 10; Soleglad & Fet, 2008: 30, 77, 100, 102; McWest, 2009: 20, 73, 78, 102, 103, Figs: 261–265; Sissom & Reddell, 2009: 31.
Type material. Holotype female. MEXICO: Tamaulipas, Conrado Castillo. IV-19-1981. Col.: P. Sprouse ( AMNH). Examined.
Paratypes: 1 J#, MEXICO: Nuevo Leon, El Real. IV-1-1980; Cols.: W. Russell and M. Cassey ( TMM). 1 ♀ , MEXICO: Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria. VI-1977. Col.: F. D. White ( WDS). 1 ♀ , MEXICO: Tamaulipas, Ejido Conrado Castillo (on the surface), IV-18-1979. Col.: M. Shumate ( WDS) . Not examined .
Other specimens examined. Vaejovis sprousei : MEXICO: Nuevo Leon, Zaragoza, Toribio, Pozo Escaner (N 23.92873°, W 101.11462°, elev. 2112 m.) I-3-2002 GoogleMaps . Col.: P. Sprouse. 1 ♂ ( CNAN-SC3150 ) .
*Variation in females is taken from the original description.
Diagnosis (Modified from Sissom, 1990 and Jarvis et al., 2005): Adults 35 to 37 mm long (Fig: 49-a, b). Carapace (Fig: 35-i) shorter than metasomal segment V (Carapace L/MS-V 0.88 [0.95]); longer than femur (Carapace L/Femur L 1.11 [1.19]); anterior margin of carapace concave. Mesosomal tergite VII with two pairs of well-developed carinae; mesosomal sternite V without a whitish patch on posterior margin; sternite VII with a pair of inconspicuous carinae, not reaching posterior margin of segment, with 12 setae. Metasomal segment I slightly wider than long, almost square in dorsal view (MSI L/ W 0.85 [0.73]); intercarinal spaces on segments I–V smooth. Segment V with lateral margins straight; more than two times longer than wide and almost as wide as deep (MS-V L/ W 2.26 [2.25]; W/D 1.12 [1.2]). Vesicle (Fig: 36-i) slender and thin, surface smooth to slightly irregular (L/ W 1.93) (W/D 1.07); dorsal surface with a large whitish vesicular gland, present almost on entire dorsal surface. Pedipalp femur (Fig: 37-i) and patella (Fig: 38-i) three times longer than wide on males, but on females slightly shorter (Femur L/ W 3.5 [3]; Patella L/W 3 [2.78]); patella prolateral median carina irregular, inconspicuous. Chela (Fig: 39, 40-i) manus thin (CM L/W/P 1.3 [1]); fixed finger as long as manus (LMQ/DF 1.06 [0.96] prolateral median, dorsal internal and prolateral ventral carinae conspicuous, feebly granular, other carinae smooth and slightly elevated, slightly differentiated in coloration. Pedipalp chela fingers dentate margins straight, without scalloping.
Hemispermatophore (Fig: 41-i): Lamelliform (LT 5; LL 2.2; AL 0.8 mm); short lamella, wider next to the hooks; two hooks almost merged, sharp and located at the base of the lamella, with a short apical crest, only present distally. Capsular region with median lobe well-sclerotized and dentate on margin.
Full morphometric variation is given in tables 13 and 14. Setae variation is given in tables 9–12.
Distribution. Tamaulipas and Nuevo León, México ( Figure 4 View FIGURE 4 ).
Natural history. This is a poorly known species, and the labels of the specimens provide little information aside from the locality; but several specimens originate from areas with pine forest.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Vaejovis sprousei Sissom, 1990
A, Contreras-Félix Gerardo & Oscar, Francke B. 2019 |
Vaejovis sprousei: Kovarík, 1998 : 148
McWest, K. 2009: 20 |
Sissom, W. D. & Reddell, J. R. 2009: 31 |
Soleglad, M. & Fet, V. 2008: 30 |
Graham, M. R. & Fet, V. 2006: 10 |
Jarvis, L. R. & Sissom, W. D. & Henson, R. N. 2005: 207 |
Gonzalez Santillan, E. & Sissom, W. D. & Perez, T. M. 2004: 9 |
Beutelspacher B. 2000: 110 |
Sissom, W. D. 2000: 543 |
Kovarik, F. 1998: 148 |
Vaejovis sprousei
Sissom, W. D. 1990: 48 |