Conidiobolus polyspermus Drechsler, Mycologia
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/mycokeys.105.117871 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11243312 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/01F48CE4-7DFE-5BAA-B274-83057F9E8A78 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Conidiobolus polyspermus Drechsler, Mycologia |
status |
|
Conidiobolus polyspermus Drechsler, Mycologia View in CoL , 53: 279. 1961.
Specimens examined.
United States, Maryland, 26 July 1955, Drechsler, ATCC 14444.
Description.
Refer to Drechsler (1961).
Notes.
In accordance with King’s numerical taxonomy of Conidiobolus ( King 1976 b) , C. polyspermus was initially identified as a synonym of C. megalotocus . However, upon a thorough comparison of morphological traits based on the original descriptions, it became evident that C. polyspermus (15–55 × 12–48 μm) produces larger conidia than those of C. megalotocus (12–44 × 10–42 μm). Notably, C. polyspermus is not reported to form microconidia, distinguishing it from C. megalotocus ( Drechsler 1956; 1961). Furthermore, the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ) revealed a distinct relationship between C. polyspermus and C. megalotocus . In light of these findings, we propose the separation of C. polyspermus from C. megalotocus , affirming its taxonomic status at the species level.
ATCC |
American Type Culture Collection |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Conidiobolus polyspermus Drechsler, Mycologia
Nie, Yong, Yin, Ying, Zhao, Heng, Liu, XiaoYong & Huang, Bo 2024 |
Conidiobolus polyspermus
Drechsler 1961: 279 |