Tenthredo fulviventris Mocsáry, 1909
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3626.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:48930777-6ACC-4AFD-996D-117F9E8D4CEF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6146458 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/015F3A43-6E00-3F72-FF21-5D83FB1D5249 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tenthredo fulviventris Mocsáry, 1909 |
status |
|
Tenthredo fulviventris Mocsáry, 1909
A senior subjective synonym of Tenthredo (Tenthredella) crenata (Enslin, 1912) , syn. nov.
TYPES. Tenthredo fulviventris Mocsáry, 1909: 35 . Syntype (s) 3, “Sibiria orientalis: Raddefka.”. Primary homonym of Tenthredo fulviventris Scopoli, 1763 [= Eurhadinoceraea fulviventris (Scopoli, 1763) ]. Lectotype Ƥ, hereby designated ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 20 – 21. 20 ). Type locality: “Sibiria or. Raddefka” [= Russia: Birobidzhan: Radde].
DISCUSSION. Enslin (1920: 91) discussed the possibility that T. fulviventris is a synonym of T. crenata , but nevertheless he decided to treat the former as valid. Conde (1935) recorded a fulviventris male from Sakhalin. Sundukov & Lelej (2009) listed the taxon for the Jewish autonomous region (Birobidzhan), based on Mocsáry’s (1909) description. The primary homonymy of the name was apparently overlooked by all authors after Mocsáry (1909). A comparison of the lectotypes of fulvicornis ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 – 21. 20 ) and fulviventris ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 20 – 21. 20 ) shows that these specimens are probably conspecific. The differences are restricted to colouration, and this may easily be explained as sexual dimorphism, which is widespread in Tenthredo . See also under Tenthredo fulvicornis .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |