Litoblatta lutea, Valverde & Crespo, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4941.4.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C272B6E8-E85D-4946-8547-964588FC9A31 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4595714 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/003B87FA-FF89-FFC3-BCCB-F1CD2572F8BE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Litoblatta lutea |
status |
sp. nov. |
Litoblatta lutea sp. nov.
( Figs. 1–8 View FIGURES 1‒8 , 68 View FIGURES 68‒74 )
Holotype. Argentina, Province of Chaco: ♁, Castelli J.J. (lat 25.9463S, long 60.6204W), 30/XII/2002, Minoli S. coll. ( MACN) MACN-En 34648 (= L. brasiliensis in Crespo & Valverde 2008; Crespo et al. 2010).
Paratypes. Argentina. Province of Catamarca: ♁, La Banderita , XI/1951, Kormiley N. coll. ( MACN) (= L. brasiliensis in Crespo et al. 2010). Province of Córdoba: ♁, locality missing , 20/XI/1948, López P. coll. ( IFML). Province of Corrientes: ♁, Paso Amores, date and coll. missing ( MLP). Province of Jujuy: ♁, locality missing , 29/ I/1958, Torres & Ferreira colls. ( MLP); ♁, Calilegua (lat 23.7735S, long 64.7710W) GoogleMaps , I/1949, Willink A. & Monrós colls. ( IFML) TBLA001 . ♁, Calilegua, XII/1948, Poore B. coll. ( IFML); ♁, PN Calilegua, Camping Aguas Negras , 20/ II /2013, Rubio G.D., Iuri H., Ojanguren A., Porta A. & Adilardi R. colls. ( FCEN). Province of Salta: ♁, Campo Durán , 16-21/ III /1984, WiIllink A., Claps & Navarro colls. ( IFML); ♁, Río Piedras , 15/ III /1938 , Birabén M. coll. ( MLP). Province of Santiago del Estero: ♁, Matará , 12/XII/1939, Birabén M. coll. ( MLP); ♁, Río Salado, Wagner coll. ( MLP). Province of Tucumán: ♁, Rumi Punco , 20/ III /1939 , Birabén M. & Scott colls. ( MLP), ♁, Tucumán (km 1333 between Tapia and Vipos , 700 m. a.s.l.), 4/ III /1965, Weyrauch W. coll. ( IFML).
Diagnosis. Supra anal apical margin sinuous ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1‒8 ). Right paraproct presents a group of converging spines, a feature that allows specific identification ( Figs.1–3 View FIGURES 1‒8 ). R1P ends distally as a quadrangular area bigger than the inner convex scale zone included ( Figs. 7–8 View FIGURES 1‒8 , 68 View FIGURES 68‒74 ).
Male. Measurements in mm: N= 15. PL: 3.2‾4.42 (4.30); TeL: 11.98‾18.26 (13.10); TL: 15.42‾21.45 (16.00); IO: 0.50‾0.90 (0.60); IOc: 0.40‾0.70 (0.60); IA: 0.50‾1.10 (0.90). Supra anal plate wider than longer. Apical margin sinuous ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1‒8 ). Cerci long and hairy ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1‒8 ). Left paraproct hook shaped, right paraproct with a group of spines convergent on the internal inferior apex ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1‒8 ). Asymmetrical subgenital plate with styli. Left stylus cylindrical and pilous. Right stylus shorter and stouter, conical with its surface covered by small spines ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1‒8 ). The margin between the styli is almost straight. Genital sclerites: L3 hook shape with apical incision, L4U present; L2 strait broader basally with a curved via distally, whose width decreases apically. R with the following recognizable sclerites: R3; the cleft, R1S + R2; R4 and R1P ( Figs. 5–7 View FIGURES 1‒8 ). R4 has a tobacco pipe shape and articulates with R2. R1P articulates cranially with R1S and ends distally as a quadrangular area which contains a convex scale zone sz ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1‒8 ).
Female. Unknown.
Etymology. From Latin adjective (masculine), luteus -a (feminine), -um (neuter), yellowish.
Distribution. Argentina-Provinces of Catamarca, Chaco, Córdoba, Corrientes, Jujuy, Salta, Santiago del Estero and Tucumán.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |