taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03C887CFFFB6FFFBFF4BFEC54DD7FEDE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968749/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968749	Figure 7. Principal component analysis of wingless gynes of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs) and M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses). Acronyms indicate the placement of type specimens: W – holotype of M.wheelerorum, C – paratype of M. cyaneum, T – types from holotype nest of M. trageri, G – types from holotype nest of M. gallicum n.sp., E – types from holotype nest of M. ergatogyna.	Figure 7. Principal component analysis of wingless gynes of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs) and M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses). Acronyms indicate the placement of type specimens: W – holotype of M.wheelerorum, C – paratype of M. cyaneum, T – types from holotype nest of M. trageri, G – types from holotype nest of M. gallicum n.sp., E – types from holotype nest of M. ergatogyna.	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFB6FFFBFF4BFEC54DD7FEDE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968915/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968915	Figure 24. Lateral aspect of Monomorium carbonarium; Netherlands: Zwartevaal, 2022	Figure 24. Lateral aspect of Monomorium carbonarium; Netherlands: Zwartevaal, 2022	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFB6FFFBFF4BFEC54DD7FEDE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968926/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968926	Figure 31. NC-part.hclust analysis of workers of Monomorium carbonarium (black bars), M. ergatogyna (blue bars), and M. gallicum n.sp. (red bars). The empty bar refers to outliers.	Figure 31. NC-part.hclust analysis of workers of Monomorium carbonarium (black bars), M. ergatogyna (blue bars), and M. gallicum n.sp. (red bars). The empty bar refers to outliers.	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFB6FFFBFF4BFEC54DD7FEDE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968928/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968928	Figure 32 (left). Sample means of principal component analysis considering 12 characters measured in workers of of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs), and M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses). Figure 33 (right). Sample means of a linear discriminant analysis considering 12 characters measured in workers of of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M.ergatogyna (white rhombs),and M.gallicum n.sp. (black crosses).Acronyms indicate the placement of type specimens: CA – type sample of M.carbonarium, CY – paratype sample of M. cyaneum, EM – paratype sample of M.emersoni, ER – type sample of M. ergatogyna, GA – type sample of M.gallicum n.sp., TR – type sample of M.trageri, WH – type specimen of M. wheelerorum.	Figure 32 (left). Sample means of principal component analysis considering 12 characters measured in workers of of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs), and M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses). Figure 33 (right). Sample means of a linear discriminant analysis considering 12 characters measured in workers of of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M.ergatogyna (white rhombs),and M.gallicum n.sp. (black crosses).Acronyms indicate the placement of type specimens: CA – type sample of M.carbonarium, CY – paratype sample of M. cyaneum, EM – paratype sample of M.emersoni, ER – type sample of M. ergatogyna, GA – type sample of M.gallicum n.sp., TR – type sample of M.trageri, WH – type specimen of M. wheelerorum.	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFB6FFFBFF4BFEC54DD7FEDE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968932/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968932	Figure 34. Results of three exploratory data analyses (EDAs) of worker samples ofMonomorium carbonarium (blackbars) and M.ergatogyna (grey bars).Shown is the NC-part.hclust dendrogram and results of NC-NMDS.kmeans and Principal Component Analysis.The empty space in the NC-part.hclust bar refers to outliers. The mean error of the three EDAs relative to the final species hypothesis is 5.0%.	Figure 34. Results of three exploratory data analyses (EDAs) of worker samples ofMonomorium carbonarium (blackbars) and M.ergatogyna (grey bars).Shown is the NC-part.hclust dendrogram and results of NC-NMDS.kmeans and Principal Component Analysis.The empty space in the NC-part.hclust bar refers to outliers. The mean error of the three EDAs relative to the final species hypothesis is 5.0%.	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFABFFFBFF61FE834E46F843.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968749/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968749	Figure 7. Principal component analysis of wingless gynes of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs) and M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses). Acronyms indicate the placement of type specimens: W – holotype of M.wheelerorum, C – paratype of M. cyaneum, T – types from holotype nest of M. trageri, G – types from holotype nest of M. gallicum n.sp., E – types from holotype nest of M. ergatogyna.	Figure 7. Principal component analysis of wingless gynes of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs) and M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses). Acronyms indicate the placement of type specimens: W – holotype of M.wheelerorum, C – paratype of M. cyaneum, T – types from holotype nest of M. trageri, G – types from holotype nest of M. gallicum n.sp., E – types from holotype nest of M. ergatogyna.	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFABFFF8FCE4FF414DC5FA38.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968749/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968749	Figure 7. Principal component analysis of wingless gynes of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs) and M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses). Acronyms indicate the placement of type specimens: W – holotype of M.wheelerorum, C – paratype of M. cyaneum, T – types from holotype nest of M. trageri, G – types from holotype nest of M. gallicum n.sp., E – types from holotype nest of M. ergatogyna.	Figure 7. Principal component analysis of wingless gynes of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs) and M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses). Acronyms indicate the placement of type specimens: W – holotype of M.wheelerorum, C – paratype of M. cyaneum, T – types from holotype nest of M. trageri, G – types from holotype nest of M. gallicum n.sp., E – types from holotype nest of M. ergatogyna.	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFABFFF8FCE4FF414DC5FA38.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968915/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968915	Figure 24. Lateral aspect of Monomorium carbonarium; Netherlands: Zwartevaal, 2022	Figure 24. Lateral aspect of Monomorium carbonarium; Netherlands: Zwartevaal, 2022	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFABFFF8FCE4FF414DC5FA38.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968926/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968926	Figure 31. NC-part.hclust analysis of workers of Monomorium carbonarium (black bars), M. ergatogyna (blue bars), and M. gallicum n.sp. (red bars). The empty bar refers to outliers.	Figure 31. NC-part.hclust analysis of workers of Monomorium carbonarium (black bars), M. ergatogyna (blue bars), and M. gallicum n.sp. (red bars). The empty bar refers to outliers.	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFABFFF8FCE4FF414DC5FA38.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968928/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968928	Figure 32 (left). Sample means of principal component analysis considering 12 characters measured in workers of of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs), and M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses). Figure 33 (right). Sample means of a linear discriminant analysis considering 12 characters measured in workers of of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M.ergatogyna (white rhombs),and M.gallicum n.sp. (black crosses).Acronyms indicate the placement of type specimens: CA – type sample of M.carbonarium, CY – paratype sample of M. cyaneum, EM – paratype sample of M.emersoni, ER – type sample of M. ergatogyna, GA – type sample of M.gallicum n.sp., TR – type sample of M.trageri, WH – type specimen of M. wheelerorum.	Figure 32 (left). Sample means of principal component analysis considering 12 characters measured in workers of of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs), and M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses). Figure 33 (right). Sample means of a linear discriminant analysis considering 12 characters measured in workers of of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M.ergatogyna (white rhombs),and M.gallicum n.sp. (black crosses).Acronyms indicate the placement of type specimens: CA – type sample of M.carbonarium, CY – paratype sample of M. cyaneum, EM – paratype sample of M.emersoni, ER – type sample of M. ergatogyna, GA – type sample of M.gallicum n.sp., TR – type sample of M.trageri, WH – type specimen of M. wheelerorum.	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFABFFF8FCE4FF414DC5FA38.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968932/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968932	Figure 34. Results of three exploratory data analyses (EDAs) of worker samples ofMonomorium carbonarium (blackbars) and M.ergatogyna (grey bars).Shown is the NC-part.hclust dendrogram and results of NC-NMDS.kmeans and Principal Component Analysis.The empty space in the NC-part.hclust bar refers to outliers. The mean error of the three EDAs relative to the final species hypothesis is 5.0%.	Figure 34. Results of three exploratory data analyses (EDAs) of worker samples ofMonomorium carbonarium (blackbars) and M.ergatogyna (grey bars).Shown is the NC-part.hclust dendrogram and results of NC-NMDS.kmeans and Principal Component Analysis.The empty space in the NC-part.hclust bar refers to outliers. The mean error of the three EDAs relative to the final species hypothesis is 5.0%.	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFA8FFFEFF4BF9A54D8EFBB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968920/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968920	Figure 27. Head of Monomorium compressum, paratype wingless gyne; Mexico: Hidalgo: San Miguel	Figure 27. Head of Monomorium compressum, paratype wingless gyne; Mexico: Hidalgo: San Miguel	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFA8FFFEFF4BF9A54D8EFBB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968915/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968915	Figure 24. Lateral aspect of Monomorium carbonarium; Netherlands: Zwartevaal, 2022	Figure 24. Lateral aspect of Monomorium carbonarium; Netherlands: Zwartevaal, 2022	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFA8FFFEFF4BF9A54D8EFBB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968749/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968749	Figure 7. Principal component analysis of wingless gynes of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs) and M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses). Acronyms indicate the placement of type specimens: W – holotype of M.wheelerorum, C – paratype of M. cyaneum, T – types from holotype nest of M. trageri, G – types from holotype nest of M. gallicum n.sp., E – types from holotype nest of M. ergatogyna.	Figure 7. Principal component analysis of wingless gynes of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs) and M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses). Acronyms indicate the placement of type specimens: W – holotype of M.wheelerorum, C – paratype of M. cyaneum, T – types from holotype nest of M. trageri, G – types from holotype nest of M. gallicum n.sp., E – types from holotype nest of M. ergatogyna.	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFA8FFFEFF4BF9A54D8EFBB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968926/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968926	Figure 31. NC-part.hclust analysis of workers of Monomorium carbonarium (black bars), M. ergatogyna (blue bars), and M. gallicum n.sp. (red bars). The empty bar refers to outliers.	Figure 31. NC-part.hclust analysis of workers of Monomorium carbonarium (black bars), M. ergatogyna (blue bars), and M. gallicum n.sp. (red bars). The empty bar refers to outliers.	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFAEFFFFFF4BFB3A4DCFFE7B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968761/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968761	Figure 12. Lateral aspect of Monomorium ebeninum; Grenadines: Beguia Island 2015; from www.antweb.org, photo Michele Esposito	Figure 12. Lateral aspect of Monomorium ebeninum; Grenadines: Beguia Island 2015; from www.antweb.org, photo Michele Esposito	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFAEFFFFFF4BFB3A4DCFFE7B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968920/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968920	Figure 27. Head of Monomorium compressum, paratype wingless gyne; Mexico: Hidalgo: San Miguel	Figure 27. Head of Monomorium compressum, paratype wingless gyne; Mexico: Hidalgo: San Miguel	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFAEFFFFFF4BFB3A4DCFFE7B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968747/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968747	Figure 5. Principal component analysis separating winged gynes (upper cluster) and wingless gynes (lower cluster) of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs), M. viridum (white squares), M. emarginatum (white triangles), M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses), M. monomorium (white dots), M. ebeninum (black triangle) and M. compressum (black square). The gyne of M. compressum is dislodged because of extreme morphology.	Figure 5. Principal component analysis separating winged gynes (upper cluster) and wingless gynes (lower cluster) of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs), M. viridum (white squares), M. emarginatum (white triangles), M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses), M. monomorium (white dots), M. ebeninum (black triangle) and M. compressum (black square). The gyne of M. compressum is dislodged because of extreme morphology.	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFAFFFFFFF63FE684A26FDC6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968763/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968763	Figure 14. Lateral aspect of Monomorium marjoriae; Mexico: Santiago Ixcuintla, coll. T. Pergande	Figure 14. Lateral aspect of Monomorium marjoriae; Mexico: Santiago Ixcuintla, coll. T. Pergande	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFAFFFFFFF63FE684A26FDC6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968940/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968940	Figure 36. Sample means of principal component analysis considering 19 characters measured in workers. Monomorium monomorium – black dots, M. marjoriae – black squares, M. lorenzoi – black rhomb, M. ebeninum – white triangles, M. ergatogyna – black X, M. compressum – black triangle, M. gallicum n.sp. – white dots, M. carbonarium – white rhombs, M. viridum – black crosses, M. emarginatum – white squares.	Figure 36. Sample means of principal component analysis considering 19 characters measured in workers. Monomorium monomorium – black dots, M. marjoriae – black squares, M. lorenzoi – black rhomb, M. ebeninum – white triangles, M. ergatogyna – black X, M. compressum – black triangle, M. gallicum n.sp. – white dots, M. carbonarium – white rhombs, M. viridum – black crosses, M. emarginatum – white squares.	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFAFFFFCFCE6FD8A4DD7F965.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968765/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968765	Figure 16. Head of Monomorium viridum in full face view; Florida: Sarasota, 1950	Figure 16. Head of Monomorium viridum in full face view; Florida: Sarasota, 1950	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFAFFFFCFCE6FD8A4DD7F965.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968767/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968767	Figure 18. Clypeus of Monomorium viridum in frontodorsal view; Florida: Sarasota, 1950	Figure 18. Clypeus of Monomorium viridum in frontodorsal view; Florida: Sarasota, 1950	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFACFFFDFF4BF96A4A7DFCCD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968920/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968920	Figure 27. Head of Monomorium compressum, paratype wingless gyne; Mexico: Hidalgo: San Miguel	Figure 27. Head of Monomorium compressum, paratype wingless gyne; Mexico: Hidalgo: San Miguel	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFADFFF2FCE4FCF14CADFAB3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968755/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968755	Figure 9. Lateral aspect of Monomorium monomorium; Spain: Cordoba, 2013	Figure 9. Lateral aspect of Monomorium monomorium; Spain: Cordoba, 2013	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
03C887CFFFADFFF2FCE4FCF14CADFAB3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968747/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968747	Figure 5. Principal component analysis separating winged gynes (upper cluster) and wingless gynes (lower cluster) of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs), M. viridum (white squares), M. emarginatum (white triangles), M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses), M. monomorium (white dots), M. ebeninum (black triangle) and M. compressum (black square). The gyne of M. compressum is dislodged because of extreme morphology.	Figure 5. Principal component analysis separating winged gynes (upper cluster) and wingless gynes (lower cluster) of Monomorium carbonarium (black dots), M. ergatogyna (white rhombs), M. viridum (white squares), M. emarginatum (white triangles), M. gallicum n.sp. (black crosses), M. monomorium (white dots), M. ebeninum (black triangle) and M. compressum (black square). The gyne of M. compressum is dislodged because of extreme morphology.	2025-04-01	Seifert, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Seifert, Bernhard			
