taxonID	type	description	language	source
D471E269FFF1FFB3FCA206A3C788F9C9.taxon	materials_examined	1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF1FFB3FCA20062C7F2FF09.taxon	materials_examined	1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF1FFB3FCA205E1C7CEFAB7.taxon	materials_examined	2 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF1FFB3FCA206F2C782F99A.taxon	materials_examined	21 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF1FFB3FCA2055CC794FA6B.taxon	materials_examined	6 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF1FFB3FCA20050C7ABFF78.taxon	materials_examined	220 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF1FFB3FCA200F4C7EDFF83.taxon	materials_examined	2 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF1FFB3FCA2078CC78BF8DC.taxon	materials_examined	6 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF1FFB3FCA2067AC7C4F901.taxon	materials_examined	5 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF1FFB3FCA20629C7F3F97E.taxon	materials_examined	17 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF1FFB3FCA20735C787F842.taxon	materials_examined	4 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF1FFB3FCA20585C73CFAD3.taxon	materials_examined	1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF1FFB3FCA207DEC78EF8ED.taxon	materials_examined	120 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF1FFB3FCA2061FC7FFF9AC.taxon	materials_examined	230 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF9007DC065FF0A.taxon	materials_examined	7 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 20 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF90628C051F97F.taxon	materials_examined	5 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 2 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF9014EC7BFFE1E.taxon	materials_examined	2 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 8 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF901B6C7BAFEC5.taxon	materials_examined	3 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 950 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE230113C6CEFEB9.taxon	materials_examined	7 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE2302D4C631FDE4.taxon	materials_examined	80 - 90 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE23013CC637FE4C.taxon	materials_examined	7 - 8 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE23026BC604FD30.taxon	materials_examined	7 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 3 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE23037EC619FC0E.taxon	materials_examined	5 - 9 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE23005DC67AFF6B.taxon	materials_examined	1500 - 2000 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 77 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 68 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE230012C62CFFBA.taxon	materials_examined	10 - 12 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 32 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 24 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE2300C1C67FFFF5.taxon	materials_examined	10 - 15 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 38 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 4 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE23009AC627FE22.taxon	materials_examined	1 - 2 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 23 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 19 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE230148C616FE1F.taxon	materials_examined	53 - 88 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 11 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 16 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE2301B5C606FEC3.taxon	materials_examined	4 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 2 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE23025FC669FD6D.taxon	materials_examined	1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 7 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 10 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE230232C6EDFD5A.taxon	materials_examined	500 - 600 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 212 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 90 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE2302E1C601FDB7.taxon	materials_examined	10 - 15 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 67 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 18 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF2FFB0FE23028BC662FDD1.taxon	materials_examined	20 - 30 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 4 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 6 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFFDFFBFFE2305F6C5BCFA85.taxon	materials_examined	1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 4 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 16 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFFDFFBFFE2305A5C603FAF2.taxon	materials_examined	20 - 30 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 33 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 366 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFFDFFBFFE230598C659F92F.taxon	materials_examined	1 - 2 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 24 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 4 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF90264C055FD33.taxon	materials_examined	2 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF90209C051FD5F.taxon	materials_examined	1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF905E0C058FA88.taxon	materials_examined	1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFFEFFBCFCF901C7C057FE94.taxon	materials_examined	1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF901C1C040FE97.taxon	materials_examined	4 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF9025AC055FD61.taxon	materials_examined	1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFFEFFBCFCF902D0C7B2FDF8.taxon	materials_examined	5 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF907EBC041F8B1.taxon	materials_examined	1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF9055CC05AFA6C.taxon	materials_examined	5 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF90112C05BFEBA.taxon	materials_examined	3 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF90532C064FA5A.taxon	materials_examined	7 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 3 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF900F4C7B2FF84.taxon	materials_examined	3 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 14 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFFEFFBCFCF90286C051FDD6.taxon	materials_examined	59 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 6 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF9061EC040F9AD.taxon	materials_examined	70 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 54 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF90001C042FF56.taxon	materials_examined	17 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 43 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFFEFFBCFCF901B5C7BDFEC3.taxon	materials_examined	63 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 32 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFF9FFBBFCF9067AC064F902.taxon	materials_examined	59 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 58 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
D471E269FFFEFFBCFCF90374C049FC03.taxon	materials_examined	10 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 41 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF41FF02FF7C0128C663F898.taxon	description	Kestrel is a qualifying interest feature of Stepa Saraiu-Horea SPA which supports a breeding population of 9 - 10 pairs. During the 2013 breeding bird surveys a single pair was recorded nesting in the vicinity of the south of the Crucean North Wind Farm, and it is likely that observations of birds recorded during the 2013 VP surveys related to these or other locally nesting birds, rather than birds from the Stepa Saraiu-Horea SPA, located 5.5 km to the northwest of the Crucea North Wind Farm site. A maximum count of 6 birds was recorded from the site at VP 3, with a total of 38 contacts across all surveys at all VPs. The CRM calculated at the most conservative avoidance rate of 95 % that one kestrel would be killed every 22.38 years, and at a more realistic avoidance rate of 99 % that one kestrel would be killed every 111.91 years (see Annex C). Average adult survival for kestrel has been estimated at 0.69 (7), and the Romanian breeding population has been estimated at 10,000 – 14,000 (8) althought the population has shown a decrease in recent years. Given the low collision mortality predicted by the CRM, the large Romanian population and the presence of the species breeding outside the SPA close to the Crucea North Wind Farm site, it can be concluded that direct collision will not result in any effects on the integrity of the SPA. Given the distance between the Crucea North Wind Farm site and the location of breeding territories of non SPA birds present so close to the wind farm site, it is considered unlikely that breeding birds from the SPA will forage over the site, and will instead use other suitable foraging habitat elsewhere within or closer to the SPA. As a result no impacts to the integrity of the SPA are predicted from loss of habitat or disturbance during construction and operation.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF41FF02FF7C0128C663F898.taxon	discussion	During the 2013 surveys of Crucea North a total of 57 common kestrels were recorded, with one breeding pair identified nesting close to the site. During the 2008 / 2009 surveys of the wider Crucea area, a total of 10 kestrels were recorded in spring and 9 in autumn and a single nest was recorded. Surveys of the Crucea East Wind Farm estimated a population of kestrel within the site of 1 - 10 individuals (Generacion Eolica Dacia SRL 2011). The 2008 / 2009 results from the wider Crucea area and information from Crucea East Wind Farm suggest that the numbers of kestrels which use these sites is relatively low in relation to the numbers recorded at Crucea North. It is reasonable to assume therefore that similar or lower collision mortality rates would apply to other nearby windfarm sites as have been calculated for Crucea North. Given the low collision mortality rates predicted for Crucea North of 0.01 birds per year based on 99 % avoidance, even with multiple sites with a similar collision risk, the in-combination collision risk mortality would still be a fraction of 1 bird killed every year. This level of mortality is not considered to be likely to have an effect on the population of kestrel within the Stepa Saraiu – Horea SPA and therefore no effects on integrity are predicted.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF41FF02FF7C0128C663F898.taxon	description	Rather than take a mean of the flight times / ha / hr, the overall figure is obtained by dividing the total flying time by the total hahr. In this case with identical VP areas this approach will make no difference. Therefore the overall kestrel flight activity was 2.46 x 10 - 7 hrs / ha / hr, amounting to 9.58 x 10 - 4 hr / hr over the whole site, taking account of the overlap of the VPs Kestrels were present on the site throughout the observation period, amounting to 153 days and they were presumed to be able to fly for an average of 14.1 hours daylight per day, a total of 2157.3 hours Kestrel occupancy (n) of the wind farm area is, therefore, estimated to be 2.07 hours per year for the observation period of five months (9.58 x 10 - 4 x 2157.3). 2.1.2 Number of Transits of Kestrel Through the Rotors The size of the flight risk volume (Vw) is 4,682,040,000 m 3. This is calculated by multiplying the area of the wind farm by the height over which birds were observed (120 m). The combined volume swept out by the turbine rotors (Vr) is 1,465,961.06 m 3. This is calculated by multiplying the number of wind turbines (36) by ̟ r 2 by (d + l), where r is the rotor radius (54.65 m), d is the depth of the rotor blade from front to back (4 m), and l is the body length of a kestrel (0.34 m). The model assumes that use of the airspace containing the rotors is random. The bird occupancy of the volume swept by the rotors in seconds (b) is: (n x 3,600) x (Vr / Vw) = (2.07 x 3600) x (1,465,961.06 / 4,682,040,000) = 2.33 bird-secs. The time taken for a bird to make transit through the rotor and completely clear the rotors (t) is (d + l) / v, where d is the depth of the rotor blade from front to back (4), l is the body length for kestrel (0.34 m) and v is the speed of the bird through the rotor (10.1 ms- 1) (32), = 0.43 secs. The number of bird transits through the rotors during the five month observational period is b / t = 5.42 2.1. 3 Estimating Collision Likelihood The probability of collision depends on the size of the bird (length and wingspan), the breadth and pitch of the turbine blades, the rotation speed of the turbine, and the flight speed of the bird. To facilitate calculation, many simplifications have to be made. The bird is assumed to be of simple cruciform shape, with the wings at the halfway point between nose and tail. The turbine blade is assumed to have a width and a pitch angle (relative to the plane of the turbine), but to have no thickness. The probability of bird collision for given bird and blade dimensions and speeds is the probability, were the bird placed anywhere at random on the line of flight, of it overlapping with a blade swathe. The calculation derives a probability of collision for a bird at a radius r from the turbine hub, and at a position along a radial line which is at an angle x from the vertical. This probability is then integrated over the entire rotor disc, assuming that the bird transit may be anywhere at random within the area of the rotor disc. For ease of use the above calculations are laid out on an Excel spreadsheet provided by SNH. As the turbine speed varies with wind speed, an average rotation period of 3.73 seconds has been used. Pitch will also vary with wind speed, but a worst case scenario of 90 o has been used. A kestrel is assumed to travel at an average speed of 10.1 ms- 1 and exhibit flapping flight (which was typical of the birds observed during the surveys). The model predicts that an average of 20.6 % of kestrel flights through the rotor swept area would result in collisions. The turbines are, however, likely to be static for 20 % of the time as the wind speeds are either too low (ie <4 ms- 1) or too high (> 25 ms- 1). Collision likelihood has, therefore, been multiplied by 0.8 giving a predicted collision rate of 16.48 %. The estimated number of collisions is then calculated by multiplying the number of birds flying through the operating rotors by the probability that a bird is hit whilst flying through the rotors. The number of birds predicted to collide with the operating rotors over the observation period is 0.89 birds per year (5.42 x 16.48 %). This assumes no avoiding action is taken by the birds. In practice, birds are expected to display a high level of awareness of operational turbines. No reliable quantitative data are available to enable avoidance of turbines to be calculated, however studies in the USA have reported rates ranging between 90 % and 99 % for varying species. Avoidance rates are thought to lie in the upper end of the range (> 98 %) for many raptor species. Mortalities for kestrel at have been calculated using avoidance rates of 90 %, 95 %, 98 % and 99 % to provide an indication of potential risk (see Table 1.4 below). This equates to a loss of a bird every 22.38 years from March to July at 95 % avoidance or a bird every 111.91 years at 99 % avoidance.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF41FF02FF7C0128C663F898.taxon	materials_examined	1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 05 - 15 - 2009 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 32 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 25 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 10 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF40FF01FF7C07B6C60FFE15.taxon	description	Common buzzard is a qualifying interest feature of Allah Bair – Capidava SPA, Stepa Saraiu-Horea SPA and Stepa Casimcea SPA. The populations for each are shown in Table 6.10 below. No common buzzards were recorded during the breeding bird surveys undertaken in 2013. During the spring VP surveys, a maximum count of 2 birds was recorded, and a total of 19 contacts were recorded across all VPs. The CRM calculated at the most conservative avoidance rate that one common buzzard would be killed every 15.48 years, and at a more realistic avoidance rate of 99 % that one common buzzard would be killed every 77.44 years (see Annex C). Average adult survival for common buzzard has been estimated at 0.9 (9) and the Romanian breeding population has been estimated at 28,000 - 34,000 (10) with far higher numbers passing through Romania on migration on their way to and from breeding sites north and west of Romania. Given the low collision mortality predicted by the CRM and the large size of the Romanian populations, it is considered unlikely that direct collision will result in any effects on the integrity of the SPA. Construction and operation of the Crucea North Wind Farm may also result in direct loss of habitat for common buzzard as well as disturbance during construction and operation and barrier effects. However the low number of birds recorded suggests that the site is not important as habitat for common buzzards on migration, and it can be concluded that there will be no effect on site integrity.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF40FF01FF7C07B6C60FFE15.taxon	discussion	During the 2013 surveys of Crucea North a total of 22 common buzzards were recorded. During the 2008 / 2009 surveys of the wider Crucea area, a total of 226 buzzards or steppe buzzards (a sub-species of common buzzard) were recorded in spring, 413 were recorded in autumn and 3 were recorded over winter. Surveys of the Crucea East Wind Farm estimated a population of common buzzard within the site of 1 - 10 individuals (Generacion Eolica Dacia SRL 2011). The results from other nearby windfarms suggest that common buzzards move through the wider area on migration in higher numbers than those recorded at the Crucea North Wind Farm site. As a result it might be expected that those other windfarms would have a higher collision risk than that calculated for Crucea North. However the results of the spring 2008 / 2009 surveys suggest that only 19 % of all birds recorded were flying at potential collision height, and in autumn 2008 / 2009, 80 % of birds were recorded flying above rotor height. As a result the actual number of birds flying through the rotor swept area is relatively small and the collision rate is likely to be lower than the overall number of birds recorded suggests. The collision rate for Crucea North was very low (0.01 bird every year based on 99 % avoidance), and although an increase in the collision rate at other nearby windfarms is likely, the in-combination collision rate is unlikely to exceed 1 bird per year, and is very unlikely to affect 1 % of any of the migratory buzzard populations for which nearby SPAs are designated.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF40FF01FF7C07B6C60FFE15.taxon	description	The overall buzzard flight activity was 3.27 x 10 - 7 hrs / ha / hr, amounting to 1.28 x 10 - 3 hr / hr over the whole site. Buzzards were present on the site throughout the observation period, amounting to 153 days and they were presumed to be able to fly for an average of 14.1 hours daylight per day, a total of 2157.3 hours Buzzard occupancy (n) of the wind farm area is, therefore, estimated to be 2.76 hours per year for the observation period (1.28 x 10 - 3 x 2157.3). 3.1. 2 Number of Transits of Buzzard Through the Rotors The size of the flight risk volume (Vw) is 4,682,040,000 m 3. The combined volume swept out by the turbine rotors (Vr) is 1,533,516.87 m 3 using a body length for buzzard of 0.54 m. The bird occupancy of the volume swept by the rotors in seconds (b) is: (n x 3,600) x (Vr / Vw) = (2.76 x 3600) x (1,533,516.87 / 4,682,040,000) = 3.25 bird-secs. The time taken for a bird to make transit through the rotor and completely clear the rotors (t) is (d + l) / v, where d is the depth of the rotor blade from front to back (4), l is the body length for buzzartd (0.54 m) and v is the speed of the bird through the rotor (11 ms- 1) (33), = 0.41 secs. The number of bird transits through the rotors per season is b / t = 7.87 3.1. 3 Estimating Collision Likelihood Using the SNH spreadsheet, and assuming a buzzard flight speed of 11 m / s, the model predicts that an average of 20.5 % of buzzard flights through the rotor swept area would result in collisions. This was reduced to 16.4 % to allow for non operating time. The number of birds predicted to collide with the operating rotors over the season is 1.29 birds per year (7.87 x 16.4 %). This assumes no avoiding action is taken by the birds. Avoidance rates were calculated as for kestrel. Mortalities were calculated using avoidance rates of 90 %, 95 %, 98 % and 99 % to provide an indication of potential risk (see Table 1.4 below). This equates to a loss of a bird every 15.48 years during the observation period at 95 % avoidance or a bird every 77.44 years at 99 % avoidance.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF40FF01FF7C07B6C60FFE15.taxon	materials_examined	21 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF42FF0FFF7C056DC7D6F845.taxon	description	Long-legged buzzard is a qualifying interest feature of Allah Bair – Capidava SPA, Cheile Dobrogei SPA, Stepa Saraiu-Horea SPA, and Stepa Casimcea SPA. The populations for each are shown in Table 6.11 below. Two possible breeding locations for long-legged buzzard were recorded during the 2013 breeding bird surveys. One approximately 3.5 km to the east of the Crucea North Wind Farm site close to the edge of the Cheile Dobrogei SPA, and one approximately 6 km south of the Crucea North Wind Farm site within the Allah Bair – Capidava SPA. The birds recorded at both of these nest locations are likely to form part of the SPA populations. During the VP surveys only single birds were recorded, with a total of 12 contacts across all VPs. The CRM calculated at the most conservative avoidance rate of 95 % that one long-legged buzzard would be killed every 22.1 years and at a more realistic avoidance rate of 99 % that one long-legged buzzard would be killed every 110.48 years (see Annex C). Average adult survival for long-legged buzzard has not been estimated but is likely to be similar to common buzzard, at 0.9. The Romanian breeding population is relatively small and has been estimated at 65 - 110 pairs, with an increasing growth trend (11). Although the SPA breeding populations of long-legged buzzard are relatively small, given the very low collision mortality calculated by the CRM, it is predicted that there will not be any effects on the SPA breeding populations of long-legged buzzard as a result of collision mortality. It is likely that adult birds will produce more than enough young to occupy suitable breeding territories within the SPA with the additional very low level of predicted mortality. The construction of the Crucea North Wind Farm will result in the loss of some areas of foraging habitat for breeding and potentially for migrating longlegged buzzard. However the area of habitat lost to each turbine is predicted to be approximately 2.6 ha per turbine or 95 ha in total. This level of land take is not predicted to have a significant effect on the available foraging area for long-legged buzzard breeding in nearby SPAs, as there is abundant alternative foraging habitat within and close to the SPAs. As a result no effect on the integrity of any SPAs from loss of habitat or disturbance during construction and operation is predicted.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF42FF0FFF7C056DC7D6F845.taxon	discussion	During the 2013 surveys of Crucea North a total of 14 long-legged buzzards were recorded. During the 2008 / 2009 surveys of the wider Crucea area, a total of 6 long-legged buzzards were recorded in spring, 5 were recorded in autumn and 3 were recorded over winter. Surveys of the Crucea East Wind Farm estimated a population of long-legged buzzard within the site of 1 - 10 individuals (Generacion Eolica Dacia SRL 2011). As with kestrel, the 2008 / 2009 results from the wider Crucea area and information from Crucea East Wind Farm suggest that the numbers of Long-legged buzzard which use these sites is relatively low in relation to the numbers recorded at Crucea North. Given the low collision mortality rates predicted for Crucea North of 0.01 birds per year based on 99 % avoidance, even with multiple sites with a similar collision risk, the in-combination collision risk mortality would still be a fraction of 1 bird killed every year. This level of mortality is not considered to be likely to have an effect on the breeding or migratory populations of long-legged buzzard within any of the SPAs for which it is a qualifying interest feature and therefore no effects on site integrity are predicted.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF42FF0FFF7C056DC7D6F845.taxon	description	The overall long-legged buzzard flight activity was 2.25 x 10 - 7 hrs / ha / hr, amounting to 8.78 x 10 - 4 hr / hr over the whole site. Long-legged buzzards were present on the site throughout the observation period, amounting to 153 days and they were presumed to be able to fly for an average of 14.1 hours daylight per day, a total of 2157.3 hours Long-legged buzzard occupancy (n) of the wind farm area is, therefore, estimated to be 1.89 hours per year for the observation period (8.78 x 10 - 4 x 2157.3). 4.1. 2 Number of Transits of Long-legged Buzzard Through the Rotors The size of the flight risk volume (Vw) is 4,682,040,000 m 3. The combined volume swept out by the turbine rotors (Vr) is 1,547,028.04 m 3 using a body length for long-legged buzzard of 0.58 m. The bird occupancy of the volume swept by the rotors in seconds (b) is: (n x 3,600) x (Vr / Vw) = (1.89 x 3600) x (1,547,028.04 / 4,682,040,000) = 2.25 bird-secs. The time taken for a bird to make transit through the rotor and completely clear the rotors (t) is (d + l) / v, where d is the depth of the rotor blade from front to back (4), l is the body length for buzzartd (0.54 m) and v is the speed of the bird through the rotor (11 ms- 1) (34), = 0.42 secs. The number of bird transits through the rotors per season is b / t 5.41 4.1. 3 Estimating Collision Likelihood Using the SNH spreadsheet, and assuming a long-leggeduzzard flight speed of 11 m / s, the model predicts that an average of 20.9 % of buzzard flights through the rotor swept area would result in collisions. This was reduced to 16.72 % to allow for non operating time. The number of birds predicted to collide with the operating rotors over the season is 0.91 birds per year (5.41 x 16.72 %). This assumes no avoiding action is taken by the birds. Avoidance rates were calculated as for kestrel. Mortalities were calculated using avoidance rates of 90 %, 95 %, 98 % and 99 % to provide an indication of potential risk (see Table 1.4 below). This equates to a loss of a bird every 22.1 years during the observation period at 95 % avoidance or a bird every 110.48 years at 99 % avoidance.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF42FF0FFF7C056DC7D6F845.taxon	materials_examined	8 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 6 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 6 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF4DFF0EFF7C07FAC728FEE7.taxon	description	Black kite is a qualifying interest feature of Allah Bair – Capidava SPA, Cheile Dobrogei SPA, Stepa Saraiu-Horea SPA, and Stepa Casimcea SPA. The populations for each are shown in Table 6.12 below. No black kite nests were recorded during breeding surveys undertaken in 2013, although a single bird was recorded poisoned within the Allah Bair-Capidava SPA. During the VP surveys black kites were only recorded on two occasions, with individual birds recorded on each occasion. The CRM calculated at the most conservative avoidance rate of 95 % that one black kite would be killed every 40.2 years and at a more realistic avoidance rate of 99 % that one black kite would be killed every 201.2 years (see Annex C). Average adult survival has not been estimated for black kite but is likely to be similar to that of the closely related red kite which has been estimated at 0.61 (12). The Romanian breeding population is relatively small and has been estimated at 120 - 160 pairs, with a declining population trend (13). Although the SPA breeding populations of black kite are small, given the very low collision mortality calculated by the CRM, it is predicted that there will not be any effects on the SPA breeding populations of black kite as a result of collision mortality. As with long-legged buzzards It is likely that adult birds will produce more than enough young to occupy suitable breeding territories within the SPA with the additional very low level of predicted mortality. The construction of the Crucea North Wind Farm will result in the loss of some areas of foraging habitat for breeding and potentially for migrating black kite. However given the very low number of flights recorded during the VP surveys, significant effects from foraging habitat or disturbance during construction and operation are not predicted. There is the potential for barrier effects on migrating black kite, however the Crucea North Wind Farm site has not been reported to support any important migratory routes in the context of the wider area and is not know to generate important thermals for migratory birds (Wildlife Management 2012). This conclusion is supported by the results of the 2013 VP surveys. As a result no barrier effects are predicted. Overall no effects to the integrity of any of the SPAs are predicted as a result of effects on the qualifying interest features black kite populations. It should be noted that birds of prey have no avoidance of poisoned bait and that this is likely to have a much greater impact on breeding bird populations than mortality related to wind farms.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF4DFF0EFF7C07FAC728FEE7.taxon	description	The overall black kite flight activity was 1.23 x 10 - 7 hrs / ha / hr, amounting to 4.79 x 10 - 4 hr / hr over the whole site. Black kites were present on the site throughout the observation period, amounting to 153 days and they were presumed to be able to fly for an average of 14.1 hours daylight per day, a total of 2157.3 hours Black kite occupancy (n) of the wind farm area is, therefore, estimated to be 1.03 hours per year during the observation period (4.79 x 10 - 4 x 2157.3). 6.1. 2 Number of Transits of Black Kite Through the Rotors The size of the flight risk volume (Vw) is 4,682,040,000 m 3. The combined volume swept out by the turbine rotors (Vr) is 1,547,028.04 m 3 using a body length for black kite of 0.58 m. The bird occupancy of the volume swept by the rotors in seconds (b) is: (n x 3,600) x (Vr / Vw) = (1.03 x 3600) x (1,547,028.04 / 4,682,040,000) = 1.23 bird-secs. The time taken for a bird to make transit through the rotor and completely clear the rotors (t) is (d + l) / v, where d is the depth of the rotor blade from front to back (4), l is the body length for blach kite (0.58 m) and v is the speed of the bird through the rotor (11.7 ms- 1) (36), = 0.39 secs. The number of bird transits through the rotors per season is b / t = 3.14 6.1. 3 Estimating Collision Likelihood Using the SNH spreadsheet, and assuming a black kite flight speed of 11.7 m / s, the model predicts that an average of 19.8 % of black kite flights through the rotor swept area would result in collisions. This was reduced to 15.84 % to allow for non operating time. The number of birds predicted to collide with the operating rotors over the season is 0.50 birds per year during the observation period (3.14 x 15.84 %). This assumes no avoiding action is taken by the birds. Avoidance rates were calculated as for kestrel. Mortalities were calculated using avoidance rates of 90 %, 95 %, 98 % and 99 % to provide an indication of potential risk (see Table 1.4 below). This equates to a loss of a bird every 40.2 years during the observation period at 95 % avoidance or a bird every 201.2 years at 99 % avoidance.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF4FFF0CFF7C056DC012F817.taxon	description	Booted eagle is a qualifying interest feature of Allah Bair – Capidava SPA, Cheile Dobrogei SPA, Stepa Saraiu-Horea SPA, and Stepa Casimcea SPA. The populations for each are shown in Table 6.13 below. A single possible booted eagle nest was recorded during breeding surveys undertaken in 2013 within the Allah Bair-Capidava SPA. During the VP surveys booted eagles were only recorded on three occasions, with individual birds recorded on each occasion. The CRM calculated at the most conservative avoidance rate of 95 % that one booted eagle would be killed every 28.08 years and at a more realistic avoidance rate of 99 % that one booted eagle would be killed every 140.41 years (see Annex C). Average adult survival has not been estimated for booted eagle. The Romanian breeding population is relatively small and has been estimated at 80 - 120 pairs, with a declining population trend (14). During migration far greater numbers pass through Romania from breeding areas to the north. Although the breeding population for Cheile Dobrogei SPA is small (and the species may also breed in low numbers in Allah-Bair-Capidava SPA) given the very low collision mortality calculated by the CRM, it is predicted that there will not be any significant effects on the SPA breeding populations of booted eagle as a result of collision mortality. Given the very low numbers of flights recorded within the windfarm site it is not predicted to be likely that loss of habitat or disturbance during construction or operation will affect the booted eagle population such that there will be an effect on the integrity of any SPAs. There is the potential for barrier effects on migrating booted eagle, however as stated for other species the Crucea North Wind Farm site has not been reported to support any important migratory routes in the context of the wider area and is not know to generate important thermals for migratory birds (Wildlife Management 2012). This conclusion is supported by the results of the 2013 VP surveys. As a result no barrier effects are predicted. Overall no effects to the integrity of any of the SPAs are predicted as a result of effects on the qualifying interest feature booted eagle populations.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF4FFF0CFF7C056DC012F817.taxon	discussion	During the 2013 surveys of Crucea North a total of 3 booted eagles were recorded. During the 2008 / 2009 surveys of the wider Crucea area a total of 4 booted eagles were recorded during autumn surveys, with none recorded during the spring, summer or winter. No booted eagles were recorded during surveys of the Crucea East Wind Farm (Generacion Eolica Dacia SRL 2011). The collision rate for booted eagle for Crucea North was calculated at 0.01 birds per year based on 99 % avoidance.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF4FFF0CFF7C056DC012F817.taxon	description	The overall boted eagle flight activity was 1.84 x 10 - 7 hrs / ha / hr, amounting to 7.19 x 10 - 4 hr / hr over the whole site. Booted eagles were present on the site throughout the observation period, amounting to 153 days and they were presumed to be able to fly for an average of 14.1 hours daylight per day, a total of 2157.3 hours Booted eagle occupancy (n) of the wind farm area is, therefore, estimated to be 1.55 hours per year for the observation period (7.19 x 10 - 4 x 2157.3). 5.1.2 Number of Transits of Booted eagles Through the Rotors The size of the flight risk volume (Vw) is 4,682,040,000 m 3. The combined volume swept out by the turbine rotors (Vr) is 1,516,627.92 m 3 using a body length for booted eagle of 0.49 m. The bird occupancy of the volume swept by the rotors in seconds (b) is: (n x 3,600) x (Vr / Vw) = (1.55 x 3600) x (1,516,627.92 / 4,682,040,000) = 1.81 bird-secs. The time taken for a bird to make transit through the rotor and completely clear the rotors (t) is (d + l) / v, where d is the depth of the rotor blade from front to back (4), l is the body length for booted eagle (0.49 m) and v is the speed of the bird through the rotor (11 ms- 1) (35), = 0.41 secs. The number of bird transits through the rotors per season is b / t = 4.43 5.1. 3 Estimating Collision Likelihood Using the SNH spreadsheet, and assuming a booted eagle flight speed of 11 m / s, the model predicts that an average of 20.1 % of booted eagle flights through the rotor swept area would result in collisions. This was reduced to 16.08 % to allow for non operating time. The number of birds predicted to collide with the operating rotors over the season is 0.71 birds per year during the observation period (4.43 x 16.08 %). This assumes no avoiding action is taken by the birds. Avoidance rates were calculated as for kestrel. Mortalities were calculated using avoidance rates of 90 %, 95 %, 98 % and 99 % to provide an indication of potential risk (see Table 1.4 below). This equates to a loss of a bird every 28.08 years during the observation period at 95 % avoidance or a bird every 140.41 years at 99 % avoidance.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF4FFF0CFF7C056DC012F817.taxon	materials_examined	2 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 7 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF4EFF0CFF7C0707C09FFEAD.taxon	description	Red-breasted goose is a qualifying interest feature of Cheile Dobrogei SPA, with a population on passage of 2,000 individuals. No red-breasted geese have been recorded during any of the migration surveys undertaken at the Crucea North Wind Farm site in 2013 or during the passage and winter 2008 / 2009 surveys of the wider area around Crucea North.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF4EFF0CFF7C0707C09FFEAD.taxon	discussion	No geese have been recorded within any of the project sites for which information has been reviewed despite specific winter surveys and autumn and spring VP watches. This is supported by sensitivity maps that indicate that the main goose foraging and roosting sites are either associated with the Danube or the Lake Sinoe-Razim complex. As a result the likelihood of Crucea North contributing to increased mortality of either species is insignificant.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF4EFF0BFF7C01DDC0F6F94D.taxon	description	Greater white-fronted goose is a qualifying interest feature of the Allah Bair – Capidava SPA, with a population over winter of 300 - 400 individuals. No greater white-fronted geese were recorded during the wintering 2008 / 2009 surveys of the wider area around Crucea North. The closely related Greenland race for the greater white-fronted goose have a relatively limited foraging range from roost sites of 5 - 8 km 15. The closest roost sites are along the Danube along the western edge of the Allah Bair-Capidava SPA, which is over 12 km from Crucea North Wind Farm site. Sensitivity mapping does not indicate any feeding areas in proximity to the wind farm. As a result it is very unlikely that wintering geese from the SPA will forage across the Crucea North Wind Farm site. Therefore there is not predicted to be any effect on site integrity as a result of collision mortality, disturbance during construction and operation, habitat loss or barrier effect.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF49FF0AFF7C06FDC745F845.taxon	description	Stone curlew is a qualifying interest feature of Allah Bair – Capidava SPA, Cheile Dobrogei SPA, Stepa Saraiu-Horea SPA, and Stepa Casimcea SPA. The populations for each are shown in Table 6.14 below. No stone curlews were recorded during the breeding surveys in 2013 or during the VP surveys. However stone curlew are know to undertake nocturnal communting flights from nesting areas to suitable foraging areas which may not have been recorded by VP surveys. The maximum recorded distances for nocturnal foraging flights for stone curlew are reported to be 3 km (16). This would mean that birds breeding at any of the SPAs apart from Allah Bair – Capadava are likely to be too far away to forage within the Crucea North Wind Farm (see Section 5 for distances between SPAs and Crucea North Wind Farm site). Allah Bair – Capidava SPA however lies 2 km to the south of Crucea North Wind Farm and stone curlew breeding close to the norther edge of the SPA could potentially forage within the Crucea North Wind Farm site. However the habitats present on the wind farm site (predominantly sunflower and maize fields) are sub-optimal foraging habitats for stone curlew which prefer steppe and spring sown crop fields. It is considered unlikely therefore that bird would forage on the wind farm site, rather than more optimal habitats within the SPA itself, at lower energetic cost. As a result no effects on the integrity of any of the SPAs are predicted as a result of effects on stone curlew from habitat loss, collision mortality, disturbance or barrier effect.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF49FF0AFF7C06FDC745F845.taxon	discussion	Stone curlew have not been recorded from any of the project sits for which information has been reviewed, and it has been determined that it is very unlikely that they would forage within the Crucea North Wind Farm site because of the distance of the site from the nearest SPA for which they are a qualifying interest features, Allah-Bair Capidava SPA. Given the low likelihood that the species will occur at Crucea North, the likelihood of an affect occurring is considered to be so low that it will not contribute to an incombination effect.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF52FF10FF7C00B7C5B6FDA1.taxon	discussion	During the 2013 surveys of Crucea North a total of 2 black kites were recorded. During the 2008 / 2009 surveys of the wider Crucea area, only 1 black kite was recorded and no black kites were recorded during surveys of the Crucea East Wind Farm (Generacion Eolica Dacia SRL 2011). Given the very low collision rate predicted for Crucea North of 0.005 birds per year based on 99 % avoidance, and the very low numbers recorded from surveys of the wider area, it is predicted that the in-combination collision risk is likely to be similar to that calculated for Crucea North, and that there will not be any effect on black kite populations which could affect the integrity of any of the SPAs.	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
038087C0FF52FF10FF7C00B7C5B6FDA1.taxon	materials_examined	1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 03 - 15 - 2013 - 05 - 31; (Table 4) • 1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2013 - 06 - 01 - 2013 - 07 - 31; (Table 4) • 1 ex.; Romania, Constanta County, Crucea, lat: 44.533, long: 28.233; 2009 - 03 - 15 - 2009 - 05 - 31; (Table 4).	en	Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter, Gundert, Martin (2013): Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW. Constanta County, Romania: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
