taxonID	type	description	language	source
0390E523F202FF86FF6C2A41FCF22EA8.taxon	description	Clupeiformes: Clupeoidei: Engraulidae: Engraulinae This species has been listed for Argentina by Chebez & Padilla (1999), Cousseau & Rosso (2019), and Mabragaña & Cousseau (2021), the latter referring to Menni et al. (1984). Menni et al. provided as only information that A. clupeoides was collected by Roux (1973) at 34 ° 31 ’ S 53 ° 43 ’ W. This locality resembles station 182 of the Calypso and is found in the EEZ-UY.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F202FF86FF6C2B09FA2D2FA3.taxon	description	Anguilliformes: Congroidei: Congridae: Congrinae Same authors and circumstances as in Chlopsis bicolor, though from Uruguayan localities 34 ° 43 ’ S 52 ° 20 ’ W, 34 ° 43 ’ S 52 ° 26 ’ W, 34 ° 51 ’ S 52 ° 33 ’ W, 35 ° 26 ’ S 52 ° 32 ’ W, 35 ° 34 ’ S 52 ° 13 ’ W, and 36 ° 07 ’ S 53 ° 22 ’ W.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F202FF86FF6C2ECEFACC2D27.taxon	description	Anguilliformes: Chlopsidae Cousseau & Rosso (2019) and Mabragaña & Cousseau (2021) included this species in their respective lists of marine fishes from Argentina, the latter with reference to Figueroa & Ehrlich (2006). These authors informed to have collected it at 35 ° 19 ’ S 52 ° 38 ’ W, a locality in the EEZ-UY, yet without providing information on vouchers of the obtained leptocephali deposited in a collection and thus, this record is not verifiable.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F202FF86FF6C285CFA122CF2.taxon	description	Anguilliformes: Congroidei: Nettastomatidae Same authors and circumstances as in Chlopsis bicolor, though from Uruguayan locality 35 ° 58 ' S 53 ° 02 ' W.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F202FF86FF6C29C5FA132C48.taxon	description	Anguilliformes: Congroidei: Ophichthidae: Ophichthinae Same authors and circumstances as in Chlopsis bicolor, though from Uruguayan locality 35 ° 24 ’ S 52 ° 28 ’ W.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F202FF86FF6C28B6FA132F1B.taxon	description	Anguilliformes: Congroidei: Nettastomatidae Same authors and circumstances as in Chlopsis bicolor, though from Uruguayan locality 35 ° 24 ’ S 52 ° 28 ’ W.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F203FF87FF6C2BE2FBCB2E04.taxon	description	Gadiformes: Macrouroidei: Macrouridae Following the chain of references from Mabragaña & Cousseau (2021) to Cousseau et al. (2020) and then to Cousseau (1993), in this last contribution one finds an unnumbered specimen from the AtlantNIRO collection in the Russian city of Kaliningrad. The single specimen was collected in international waters some 35 nautical miles beyond the outer limit of the EEZ-AR at 46 ° 41 ’ S 60 ° 01 ’ W.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F203FF87FF6C2925FBC52DAF.taxon	description	Stomiiformes: Stomiidae: Idiacanthinae For including this species in the list of Argentina’s marine fishes Mabragaña & Cousseau (2021) provided Menni et al. (1984) as their source. This reference is erroneous as Menni et al. did not consider I. fasciola to be found off Argentina, but only mentioned it as the type species of the genus.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F203FF87FF6C2D85FC5A2893.taxon	description	Stomiiformes: Stomiidae: Stomiinae The Stareye Lightfish has been treated as Argentinean species by Chebez & Padilla (1999), Cousseau & Rosso (2019), and Mabragaña & Cousseau (2021), the latter with reference to Menni et al. (1984) who in turn referred to Menezes & Benvegnú (1976 a) with an erroneous statement for ‘ Uruguay’. Menezes & Benvegnú informed about a single specimen of this species obtained at station 1890 of the Brazilian research vessel Besnard, 33 ° 58 ’ S 51 ° 32 ’ W, a locality in the EEZ-BR.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F203FF87FF6C2C90FC612BDB.taxon	description	Stomiiformes: Stomiidae: Stomiinae Mabragaña & Cousseau (2021) made reference to Figueroa et al. (1998), who reported this species from Kaiyo Maru station 33 / 89, 43 ° 05 ’ S 54 ° 39 ’ W, in international waters.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F203FF87FF6C2872FACA2F3E.taxon	description	Zeiformes: Grammicolepididae: Grammicolepidinae	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F203FF84FF6C2A19FC5D2828.taxon	description	Syngnathiformes: Syngnathoidei: Syngnathidae: Syngnathinae	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F200FF85FF6C2A32FDAB2844.taxon	description	Carangiformes: Carangoidei: Carangidae: Caranginae Ringuelet & Arámburu (1960), Menezes & Figueiredo (1980), Menezes et al. (2003), Milessi et al. (2017), Cousseau & Rosso (2019), Mabragaña & Cousseau (2021, referring to Menni et al. 1984), and Carvalho-Filho (2023) have stated an Argentine distribution for the Atlantic bumber. As in the previous case, Menni et al. (1984) made reference to Devincenzi’s (1924) finding at Montevideo and thus, considered Uruguay, but not Argentina for this species.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F200FF84FF6C295EFCD02CF9.taxon	description	Carangiformes: Menoidei: Istiophoridae The first records for Argentina have been published under the name Istiophorus americanus by Gneri & Nani (1960) and Ringuelet & Arámburu (1960), while subsequent authors used I. albicans (Nakamura 1983, referring to Ringuelet & Arámburu; Menni et al. 1984, with reference to Gneri & Nani; Cousseau & Rosso 2019; Mabragaña & Cousseau 2021, referring to Menni et al.). Both names are today treated to be junior synonyms of Istiophorus platypterus. While Ringuelet & Arámburu (1960) provided no source at all, Gneri & Nani (1960) treated this species as a target for commercial fisheries at high seas which ‘ en nuestro país es especialmente aquella que se lleva a cabo en las aguas oceánicas, fuera del límite de la plataforma continental’ and including the Indo-Pacific sailfish among the species ’ capturados en la pesca pelágica realizada en las adyacencias del Mar Argentino’.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F200FF84FF6C2F8FFC062D4A.taxon	description	Carangiformes: Menoidei: Istiophoridae The Atlantic Blue Marlin has been mentioned as being part of the marine ichthyofauna of Argentina by Ringuelet & Arámburu (1960, sub M. ampla), Nakamura (1983, referring to Ringuelet & Arámburu 1960), Cousseau & Rosso (2019), Mabragaña & Cousseau (2021, with reference to Menni et al. 1984), and Carvalho-Filho (2023). Nevertheless, Menni et al. (1984) in their ‘ bi-national’ book did not include Makaira ampla, a junior synonym of M. nigricans, for Argentina, but only for Uruguay by referring to Buen (1950), who described Makaira perezi, another jr. synonym, as a new species from Montevideo.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F200FF84FF6C2CFDFE622B99.taxon	description	Scombriformes: Scombroidei: Scombridae: Scombrinae Chebez & Athor (2009), Cousseau & Rosso (2019), Mabragaña & Cousseau (2021), referring to the book of Gon & Heemstra, but actually meaning the chapter written by Nakamura, considered the Southern Bluefin Tuna to be part of the Argentinean marine ichthyofauna. As a matter of fact Nakamura (1990) indicated this species to be “ distributed throughout temperate and cold seas of the Southern Hemisphere, mainly between 30 ° and 50 ° S ”, a very general statement with no references to Argentina or even the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Galván et al. (2021) even mentioned an “ anecdotic occurrence ” for the records from Argentina.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F201FF85FF6C2B95FA932EFE.taxon	description	Perciformes: Percoidei: Epinephelidae The Mutton Hamlet was listed as from Argentina by Pozzi & Bordalé (1935), Norman (1937), Ringuelet & Arámburu (1960), Menni et al. (1984), Cousseau & Rosso (2019), and Mabragaña & Cousseau (2021). None of these provided any information on a deposited voucher specimen or a specific location.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F201FF85FF6C2C58FD9828B3.taxon	description	Carangiformes: Carangoidei: Carangidae: Caranginae The presence off Argentina is commented on as ‘ anecdotic occurrence’ by Galván et al. (2021). Again, the chain of references from Mabragaña & Cousseau (2021), via Menni et al. (1984), leads to a listing by Devincenzi (1924) for Uruguay.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F201FF85FF6C289EFD762F97.taxon	description	Beloniformes: Exocoetidae In addition to follow Cousseau et al. (2010) and Figueroa (2019), Mabragaña & Cousseau (2021) also referred to Menni et al. (1984). These latter authors mentioned a publication on larval exocoetids from the Atlantic without localities or specimens (John 1976), but also a finding of a larval Hirundichthys sp. at 36 ° 41 ' S 53 ° 17 ' W, a location in the EEZ-UY.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F201FF85FF6C2F76FBB82BFA.taxon	description	Carangiformes: Carangoidei: Carangidae: Scomberoidinae The same authors and circumstances as in the previous two cases, now indicating findings in Uruguayan waters near Montevideo at Punta Gorda and Pocitos (Devincenzi 1939).	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F201FF85FF6C2826FB002C8A.taxon	description	Carangiformes: Carangoidei: Rachycentridae The third work of Devincenzi (1933) referred to by Menni et al. (1984) for a record from Uruguay, and those authors again have been ‘ misinterpreted’ for an inclusion in the list of Argentine fishes.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F201FF85FF6C2908FD322C42.taxon	description	Carangiformes: Carangoidei: Echeneidae Berg (1895) mentioned the Common Sharksucker from Maldonado, later taken as a reference by Menni et al. (1984). Berg’s mention for Uruguay has been misused to include this species mentioned for Uruguay, also for Argentina since Lahille (1906).	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F201FF8AFF6C2AA2FEAA2828.taxon	description	Perciformes: Percoidei: Epinephelidae Same authors and circumstances as above for Anchovia clupeoides, only here for Calypso station 158, located at 34 ° 30 ' S 52 ° 51 ' W in the very northern portion of the EEZ-UY. Carvalho-Filho et al. (2024) even questioned the correct determination by stating “ … Cephalopholis fulva captured by the Calypso was at station 158, off Uruguay, which is almost impossible as this tropical species cannot live in temperate waters ”.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
0390E523F20EFF8AFF6C297BFDF62DB3.taxon	description	Tetraodontiformes: Tetraodontoidei: Molidae The only mention for Argentina was done by Mabragaña & Cousseau (2021) with reference to Rendón et al. (2013). These authors presented the explicit first record for Uruguay, yet without any information on a distinct locality or the mentioned photo. Therefor this record does not count for Argentina and, for the lack of evidence, neither for Uruguay.	en	Inventories, Stefan Koerber Abstract National Biodiversity (2025): To be dismissed: 61 marine bony fishes included in Argentina’s National Biodiversity Inventory based on unsuitable sources or erroneous data. Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 90: 1-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17002120
