taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
F08BA9AC85915E4CAF600F9CCAF2F19E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384081	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure4	Figure 4. Annulohypoxylon bahnphadengense on dead wood of Berrya cordifolia (MFLU 24-0526, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascostromata on host; d, e. Horizontal section through ascomata (arrow shows the ostiolar disc); f. Peridium; g. Paraphyses; h – m. Asci; n. Apical apparatus stained blue with Melzer’s reagent; o – q. Ascospores; r. Germinated ascospores; s, t. Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 500 μm (d); 200 μm (e); 20 μm (f, g, i – m); 10 μm (h, r); 5 μm (n – q).	Figure 4. Annulohypoxylon bahnphadengense on dead wood of Berrya cordifolia (MFLU 24-0526, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascostromata on host; d, e. Horizontal section through ascomata (arrow shows the ostiolar disc); f. Peridium; g. Paraphyses; h – m. Asci; n. Apical apparatus stained blue with Melzer’s reagent; o – q. Ascospores; r. Germinated ascospores; s, t. Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 500 μm (d); 200 μm (e); 20 μm (f, g, i – m); 10 μm (h, r); 5 μm (n – q).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
F08BA9AC85915E4CAF600F9CCAF2F19E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384080	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure3	Figure 3. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Biscogniauxia petrensis (HKAS 102388). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 3. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Biscogniauxia petrensis (HKAS 102388). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
187AE288FC895D75875E1B77BCD88780.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384082	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure5	Figure 5. Annulohypoxylon chiangraiense on a dead branch of Tamarindus indica (MFLU 24-0524, Holotype). a. Sustrate; b, c. Stromata on the host; d. Cross section of the stroma; e. Peridium; f. Paraphyses; g – j. Asci; k. Ascal apical apparatus (not staining in Melzer’s reagent); l – o. Ascospores; p, q. Colony on the PDA (p upper, q lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 500 μm (d); 20 μm (e – k); 10 μm (l – o).	Figure 5. Annulohypoxylon chiangraiense on a dead branch of Tamarindus indica (MFLU 24-0524, Holotype). a. Sustrate; b, c. Stromata on the host; d. Cross section of the stroma; e. Peridium; f. Paraphyses; g – j. Asci; k. Ascal apical apparatus (not staining in Melzer’s reagent); l – o. Ascospores; p, q. Colony on the PDA (p upper, q lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 500 μm (d); 20 μm (e – k); 10 μm (l – o).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
187AE288FC895D75875E1B77BCD88780.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384080	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure3	Figure 3. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Biscogniauxia petrensis (HKAS 102388). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 3. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Biscogniauxia petrensis (HKAS 102388). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
3BF3D690588C50BE8D5839E4C3204566.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384083	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure6	Figure 6. Annulohypoxylon crowfoothodgkiniae on decaying wood of Swietenia macrophylla (MFLU 24-0522, a new host and geographical record). a. Substrate; b, c. Stromata on the host; d. Cross section of the stroma; e. Paraphyses; f – j. Asci; k. Ascus apical apparatus (not stained in Melzer’s reagent); l – q. Ascospores; r, s. Colony on PDA (r upper, s lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 200 μm (d); 20 μm (e – k); 5 μm (l – q).	Figure 6. Annulohypoxylon crowfoothodgkiniae on decaying wood of Swietenia macrophylla (MFLU 24-0522, a new host and geographical record). a. Substrate; b, c. Stromata on the host; d. Cross section of the stroma; e. Paraphyses; f – j. Asci; k. Ascus apical apparatus (not stained in Melzer’s reagent); l – q. Ascospores; r, s. Colony on PDA (r upper, s lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 200 μm (d); 20 μm (e – k); 5 μm (l – q).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
3BF3D690588C50BE8D5839E4C3204566.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384080	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure3	Figure 3. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Biscogniauxia petrensis (HKAS 102388). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 3. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Biscogniauxia petrensis (HKAS 102388). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
2147B750CED2549BA1776B263B9FD47B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384085	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure8	Figure 8. Annulohypoxylon purpureonitens on the dead wood of Sterculia tragacantha (MFLU 24-0527, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascostromata on host; d. Ostiolar discs in ascomata (indicated by arrows); e. Horizontal section through ascomata; f. Paraphyses; g – l. Asci; m. Apical apparatus (not staining in Melzer’s reagent); n – q. Ascospores (q: arrows indicate the germ slit); r Germinated ascospores; s, t Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 500 μm (c, d); 200 μm (e); 20 μm (f – l); 5 μm (m – r).	Figure 8. Annulohypoxylon purpureonitens on the dead wood of Sterculia tragacantha (MFLU 24-0527, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascostromata on host; d. Ostiolar discs in ascomata (indicated by arrows); e. Horizontal section through ascomata; f. Paraphyses; g – l. Asci; m. Apical apparatus (not staining in Melzer’s reagent); n – q. Ascospores (q: arrows indicate the germ slit); r Germinated ascospores; s, t Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 500 μm (c, d); 200 μm (e); 20 μm (f – l); 5 μm (m – r).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
2147B750CED2549BA1776B263B9FD47B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384080	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure3	Figure 3. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Biscogniauxia petrensis (HKAS 102388). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 3. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Biscogniauxia petrensis (HKAS 102388). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
5CC6F3EF01655012B3A796BFD7DB8A69.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384084	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure7	Figure 7. Annulohypoxylon spougei on dead wood of Antidesma madagascariense (MFLU 24-0526, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascostromata on the host; d. Ostiolar discs in ascomata (indicated by arrows); e. Horizontal section through the ascomata; f. Paraphyses; g-i. Asci; j. Apical apparatus stained blue with Melzer’s reagent; k-p. Ascospores; q. Germinated ascospores; r, s. Colony on the PDA (r upper, s lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 500 μm (c, d); 200 μm (e); 20 μm (f); 10 μm (g – i, q); 5 μm (j – p).	Figure 7. Annulohypoxylon spougei on dead wood of Antidesma madagascariense (MFLU 24-0526, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascostromata on the host; d. Ostiolar discs in ascomata (indicated by arrows); e. Horizontal section through the ascomata; f. Paraphyses; g-i. Asci; j. Apical apparatus stained blue with Melzer’s reagent; k-p. Ascospores; q. Germinated ascospores; r, s. Colony on the PDA (r upper, s lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 500 μm (c, d); 200 μm (e); 20 μm (f); 10 μm (g – i, q); 5 μm (j – p).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
5CC6F3EF01655012B3A796BFD7DB8A69.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384079	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure2	Figure 2. Astrocystis bambusae on a dead twig of Bambusa vulgaris (MFLU 24-0522, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of stromata on the host; d. Cross section of the stroma; e. Peridium; f. Paraphyses; g – j. Asci; k. Ascus apical apparatus (stained in Melzer’s reagent); l – q. Ascospores; r. Ascospores with sheath; s, t. Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 500 μm (d); 20 μm (f – j); 10 μm (e, k – r).	Figure 2. Astrocystis bambusae on a dead twig of Bambusa vulgaris (MFLU 24-0522, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of stromata on the host; d. Cross section of the stroma; e. Peridium; f. Paraphyses; g – j. Asci; k. Ascus apical apparatus (stained in Melzer’s reagent); l – q. Ascospores; r. Ascospores with sheath; s, t. Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 500 μm (d); 20 μm (f – j); 10 μm (e, k – r).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
D28D608AAFA85EC4834A57EDF81E1D20.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384086	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure9	Figure 9. Annulohypoxylon violaceopigmentum on the dead wood of Syzygium polyanthum (MFLU 24-0528, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascomata on the host (ostiolar discs indicated by the arrow); d. Horizontal section through ascomata; e. Paraphyses; f – k. Asci; l. Ascus apical apparatus (not stained in Melzer’s reagent); m – q. Ascospores (q: arrow indicates the germ slit); r A germinated ascospore; s, t Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d); 20 μm (e – k, r); 5 μm (l – q).	Figure 9. Annulohypoxylon violaceopigmentum on the dead wood of Syzygium polyanthum (MFLU 24-0528, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascomata on the host (ostiolar discs indicated by the arrow); d. Horizontal section through ascomata; e. Paraphyses; f – k. Asci; l. Ascus apical apparatus (not stained in Melzer’s reagent); m – q. Ascospores (q: arrow indicates the germ slit); r A germinated ascospore; s, t Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d); 20 μm (e – k, r); 5 μm (l – q).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
D28D608AAFA85EC4834A57EDF81E1D20.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384080	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure3	Figure 3. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Biscogniauxia petrensis (HKAS 102388). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 3. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Biscogniauxia petrensis (HKAS 102388). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
806C1BA37232544DA1F9660E6FD1ED71.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384080	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure3	Figure 3. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Biscogniauxia petrensis (HKAS 102388). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 3. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Biscogniauxia petrensis (HKAS 102388). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
5B8DF55F691752A69668B5754B8EF78E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384079	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure2	Figure 2. Astrocystis bambusae on a dead twig of Bambusa vulgaris (MFLU 24-0522, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of stromata on the host; d. Cross section of the stroma; e. Peridium; f. Paraphyses; g – j. Asci; k. Ascus apical apparatus (stained in Melzer’s reagent); l – q. Ascospores; r. Ascospores with sheath; s, t. Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 500 μm (d); 20 μm (f – j); 10 μm (e, k – r).	Figure 2. Astrocystis bambusae on a dead twig of Bambusa vulgaris (MFLU 24-0522, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of stromata on the host; d. Cross section of the stroma; e. Peridium; f. Paraphyses; g – j. Asci; k. Ascus apical apparatus (stained in Melzer’s reagent); l – q. Ascospores; r. Ascospores with sheath; s, t. Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 500 μm (d); 20 μm (f – j); 10 μm (e, k – r).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
5B8DF55F691752A69668B5754B8EF78E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384078	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Xylotumulus gibbisporus (ATCC MYA- 4109), Xylaria glebulosa (GMB 1053), and X. schweinitzii (HAST 92092023). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the node. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 1. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Xylotumulus gibbisporus (ATCC MYA- 4109), Xylaria glebulosa (GMB 1053), and X. schweinitzii (HAST 92092023). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the node. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
E52E52878EFF559F8D79FC67E4A3E461.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384078	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Xylotumulus gibbisporus (ATCC MYA- 4109), Xylaria glebulosa (GMB 1053), and X. schweinitzii (HAST 92092023). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the node. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 1. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, β-tub, and rpb 2. The tree is rooted to Xylotumulus gibbisporus (ATCC MYA- 4109), Xylaria glebulosa (GMB 1053), and X. schweinitzii (HAST 92092023). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the node. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
A090A05970E250338C01436EEC16FB85.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384094	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure17	Figure 17. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Kretzschmaria deusta (CBS 826.72) and Xylaria hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are presented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 17. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Kretzschmaria deusta (CBS 826.72) and Xylaria hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are presented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
91BF7F2A210354FF983DE06CE865E42E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384095	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure18	Figure 18. Diatrypella thailandica on a dead branch of Fabaceae sp. (MFLU 24-0533, holotype) a. Substrate; b, c. Stromata on the substrate; d. Cross-section of a stroma; e. Vertical section through stroma showing ostiole and perithecia; f. Ostiole; g. Peridium; h. Paraphyses; i – l. Asci; m. Apical apparatus in Melzer’s reagent; n – q. Ascospores. Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d); 100 μm (e, f); 10 μm (g); 20 μm (h – m); 5 μm (n – q).	Figure 18. Diatrypella thailandica on a dead branch of Fabaceae sp. (MFLU 24-0533, holotype) a. Substrate; b, c. Stromata on the substrate; d. Cross-section of a stroma; e. Vertical section through stroma showing ostiole and perithecia; f. Ostiole; g. Peridium; h. Paraphyses; i – l. Asci; m. Apical apparatus in Melzer’s reagent; n – q. Ascospores. Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d); 100 μm (e, f); 10 μm (g); 20 μm (h – m); 5 μm (n – q).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
91BF7F2A210354FF983DE06CE865E42E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384094	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure17	Figure 17. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Kretzschmaria deusta (CBS 826.72) and Xylaria hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are presented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 17. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Kretzschmaria deusta (CBS 826.72) and Xylaria hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are presented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
63FA1191BB725099A27F5311F6CD8849.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384087	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure10	Figure 10. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, rpb 2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Hypoxylon fragiforme (HAST 383 and MUCL 51264). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 10. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, rpb 2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Hypoxylon fragiforme (HAST 383 and MUCL 51264). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
D67773CC30AE58789C0FDB4DD040DBEC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384088	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure11	Figure 11. Halorosellinia xylocarpi on decaying submerged wood of Arecaceae sp. (MFLU 24-0536, a new host record). a. Substrate; b. Appearance of an ascoma on the host; c. A horizontal section through an ascoma; d. Peridium; e. Paraphyses; f – k. Asci; l, m. Apical apparatus stained blue with Melzer’s reagent; n – s. Ascospores (r: arrow shows the germ slit on the ventral side); t A germinated ascospore; u, v Colony on the PDA (u upper, v lower). Scale bars: 100 μm (b, c); 20 μm (d – k); 10 μm (l – t).	Figure 11. Halorosellinia xylocarpi on decaying submerged wood of Arecaceae sp. (MFLU 24-0536, a new host record). a. Substrate; b. Appearance of an ascoma on the host; c. A horizontal section through an ascoma; d. Peridium; e. Paraphyses; f – k. Asci; l, m. Apical apparatus stained blue with Melzer’s reagent; n – s. Ascospores (r: arrow shows the germ slit on the ventral side); t A germinated ascospore; u, v Colony on the PDA (u upper, v lower). Scale bars: 100 μm (b, c); 20 μm (d – k); 10 μm (l – t).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
D67773CC30AE58789C0FDB4DD040DBEC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384087	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure10	Figure 10. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, rpb 2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Hypoxylon fragiforme (HAST 383 and MUCL 51264). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 10. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, rpb 2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Hypoxylon fragiforme (HAST 383 and MUCL 51264). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
B0C3A28D4C4350379064D8FB59AF9633.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384092	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure15	Figure 15. Hypomontagnella hibisci on a decaying branch of Hibiscus sp. (MFLU 24-0532, Holotype). a. Substrate; b. Mature stroma on the bark; c. Stromatal surface showing papillate and ostiolar discs (indicated by white arrows); d – f. Stromata in vertical sections; g. Peridium; h. Paraphyses; i – m. Asci; n. Apical apparatus with Melzer’s reagent; o – r. Ascospores; s, t. Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 200 μm (d); 100 μm (e); 50 μm (f); 10 μm (g, n); 20 μm (h – m); 5 μm (o – r).	Figure 15. Hypomontagnella hibisci on a decaying branch of Hibiscus sp. (MFLU 24-0532, Holotype). a. Substrate; b. Mature stroma on the bark; c. Stromatal surface showing papillate and ostiolar discs (indicated by white arrows); d – f. Stromata in vertical sections; g. Peridium; h. Paraphyses; i – m. Asci; n. Apical apparatus with Melzer’s reagent; o – r. Ascospores; s, t. Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 200 μm (d); 100 μm (e); 50 μm (f); 10 μm (g, n); 20 μm (h – m); 5 μm (o – r).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
B0C3A28D4C4350379064D8FB59AF9633.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384090	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure13	Figure 13. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Graphostroma platystomum (CBS 270.87), Natonodosa speciosa (CLM RV 86), Xylaria arbuscula (CBS 126415), and X. hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 13. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Graphostroma platystomum (CBS 270.87), Natonodosa speciosa (CLM RV 86), Xylaria arbuscula (CBS 126415), and X. hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
6CFB1552E384563CA0BFD92B6618326B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384093	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure16	Figure 16. Hypomontagnella monticulosa on a dead branch of Macaranga peltata (MFLU 24-0531, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of mature stroma on the host; d. A horizontal section through ascomata; e. Paraphyses; f – i. Asci; j. Apical apparatus stained blue with Melzer’s reagent; k – n. Ascospores; o. A germinated ascospore; p, q. Colony on the PDA (p upper, q lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d); 20 μm (e – i); 10 μm (j, o); 5 μm (k – n).	Figure 16. Hypomontagnella monticulosa on a dead branch of Macaranga peltata (MFLU 24-0531, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of mature stroma on the host; d. A horizontal section through ascomata; e. Paraphyses; f – i. Asci; j. Apical apparatus stained blue with Melzer’s reagent; k – n. Ascospores; o. A germinated ascospore; p, q. Colony on the PDA (p upper, q lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d); 20 μm (e – i); 10 μm (j, o); 5 μm (k – n).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
6CFB1552E384563CA0BFD92B6618326B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384090	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure13	Figure 13. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Graphostroma platystomum (CBS 270.87), Natonodosa speciosa (CLM RV 86), Xylaria arbuscula (CBS 126415), and X. hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 13. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Graphostroma platystomum (CBS 270.87), Natonodosa speciosa (CLM RV 86), Xylaria arbuscula (CBS 126415), and X. hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
0777540039715843993CA1103C1CD36C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384090	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure13	Figure 13. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Graphostroma platystomum (CBS 270.87), Natonodosa speciosa (CLM RV 86), Xylaria arbuscula (CBS 126415), and X. hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 13. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Graphostroma platystomum (CBS 270.87), Natonodosa speciosa (CLM RV 86), Xylaria arbuscula (CBS 126415), and X. hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
8CECEFFF0DB3539FADEE0E56590A994E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384091	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure14	Figure 14. Hypoxylon thailandicum on a dead branch of Bambusa vulgaris (MFLU 24-0530, Holotype). a. Substrate; b – d. Appearance of ascostromata on the host; e, f. A horizontal section through an ascoma; g. Peridium; h – j. Asci; k. Inamyloid apical ascal apparatus stained with Melzer’s reagent; l – o. Ascospores; p. A germinated ascospore; q, r. Colony on the PDA (q upper, r lower). Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 200 μm (c, d); 100 μm (e, f); 20 μm (h – k); 10 μm (g, l – p).	Figure 14. Hypoxylon thailandicum on a dead branch of Bambusa vulgaris (MFLU 24-0530, Holotype). a. Substrate; b – d. Appearance of ascostromata on the host; e, f. A horizontal section through an ascoma; g. Peridium; h – j. Asci; k. Inamyloid apical ascal apparatus stained with Melzer’s reagent; l – o. Ascospores; p. A germinated ascospore; q, r. Colony on the PDA (q upper, r lower). Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 200 μm (c, d); 100 μm (e, f); 20 μm (h – k); 10 μm (g, l – p).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
8CECEFFF0DB3539FADEE0E56590A994E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384090	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure13	Figure 13. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Graphostroma platystomum (CBS 270.87), Natonodosa speciosa (CLM RV 86), Xylaria arbuscula (CBS 126415), and X. hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 13. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Graphostroma platystomum (CBS 270.87), Natonodosa speciosa (CLM RV 86), Xylaria arbuscula (CBS 126415), and X. hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
2D28D00C1D4A5D138A8E923EDBB3BB27.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384096	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure19	Figure 19. Paraeutypella citricola on a dead branch of Swietenia macrophylla (MFLU 24-0535, a new host record). a. Substrate; b. Stromata on the substrate; c. A cross-section of a stroma; d. A vertical section through the stroma shows ostioles and perithecia; e. Peridium; f. Paraphyses; g – k. Asci; l – o. Ascospores; p, q. Colony on the PDA (p upper, q lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 200 μm (d); 20 μm (e – k); 5 μm (l – o).	Figure 19. Paraeutypella citricola on a dead branch of Swietenia macrophylla (MFLU 24-0535, a new host record). a. Substrate; b. Stromata on the substrate; c. A cross-section of a stroma; d. A vertical section through the stroma shows ostioles and perithecia; e. Peridium; f. Paraphyses; g – k. Asci; l – o. Ascospores; p, q. Colony on the PDA (p upper, q lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 200 μm (d); 20 μm (e – k); 5 μm (l – o).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
2D28D00C1D4A5D138A8E923EDBB3BB27.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384094	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure17	Figure 17. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Kretzschmaria deusta (CBS 826.72) and Xylaria hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are presented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 17. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Kretzschmaria deusta (CBS 826.72) and Xylaria hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are presented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
15643B0DC30C577AB93F47A23D7CBEBF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384089	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure12	Figure 12. Stilbohypoxylon chiangraiense on the dead branch of Saraca sp. (MFLU 24-0529, Holotype). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of stromata on the host, showing yellow scales (arrows indicating yellow scales); d, e. A horizontal section through a stroma; f. Peridium; g. Paraphyses; h, i. Immature asci; j. Apical apparatus stained in blue with Melzer’s reagent; k – m. Ascospores; n, o. Ascospores with a germ slit (arrows indicating a spiral germ slit); p, q. Colony on the PDA (p upper, q lower). Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d, e); 20 μm (g – j); 10 μm (f, k – o).	Figure 12. Stilbohypoxylon chiangraiense on the dead branch of Saraca sp. (MFLU 24-0529, Holotype). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of stromata on the host, showing yellow scales (arrows indicating yellow scales); d, e. A horizontal section through a stroma; f. Peridium; g. Paraphyses; h, i. Immature asci; j. Apical apparatus stained in blue with Melzer’s reagent; k – m. Ascospores; n, o. Ascospores with a germ slit (arrows indicating a spiral germ slit); p, q. Colony on the PDA (p upper, q lower). Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d, e); 20 μm (g – j); 10 μm (f, k – o).	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
15643B0DC30C577AB93F47A23D7CBEBF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1384087	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915.figure10	Figure 10. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, rpb 2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Hypoxylon fragiforme (HAST 383 and MUCL 51264). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	Figure 10. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, rpb 2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Hypoxylon fragiforme (HAST 383 and MUCL 51264). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.	2025-07-29	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Chethana, K. W. Thilini;Manowong, Areerat;Bhagya, Amuhenage T.;Win, Hsan;Tun, Zaw L.;Mapook, Ausana;Hyde, Kevin D.			
