taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
3121BE0C4374FF9CFC7D18FEFAADB570.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14828670/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14828670	Figure 10. Dorsal view of reconstructed paranasal sinus system and jaw adductor muscles (M. pterygoideus, M. pseudotemporalis profundus and M. adductor mandibulae posterior) in the lower jaw, palate and maxilla of quail (A–D) and zebra finch (E–H) showing muscular and palatal constraints on paranasal pneumatic extensions. The M. pterygoideus, M. pseudotemporalis profundus and M. adductor mandibulae posterior (A, E), with removal of the paranasal sinuses (B, F), M. pseudotemporalis profundus and M. adductor mandibulae posterior (C, G) and M. pterygoideus (D, H). The pneumatic extensions within the bones (D) and adipose tissue (H) are shown in the semitransparent rendered bones. The anterior end of the maxilla is fused with the premaxilla, thus only the posterior portion of the maxilla is shown in the zebra finch. The dashed circle in (E) indicates the concavity of the posterior end of the antorbital sinus that is laterally constricted by the ectethmoid bone. Scale bars equal 1 cm. A–D are at same scale and E–H are at same scale.	Figure 10. Dorsal view of reconstructed paranasal sinus system and jaw adductor muscles (M. pterygoideus, M. pseudotemporalis profundus and M. adductor mandibulae posterior) in the lower jaw, palate and maxilla of quail (A–D) and zebra finch (E–H) showing muscular and palatal constraints on paranasal pneumatic extensions. The M. pterygoideus, M. pseudotemporalis profundus and M. adductor mandibulae posterior (A, E), with removal of the paranasal sinuses (B, F), M. pseudotemporalis profundus and M. adductor mandibulae posterior (C, G) and M. pterygoideus (D, H). The pneumatic extensions within the bones (D) and adipose tissue (H) are shown in the semitransparent rendered bones. The anterior end of the maxilla is fused with the premaxilla, thus only the posterior portion of the maxilla is shown in the zebra finch. The dashed circle in (E) indicates the concavity of the posterior end of the antorbital sinus that is laterally constricted by the ectethmoid bone. Scale bars equal 1 cm. A–D are at same scale and E–H are at same scale.	2019-01-24	Tahara, Rui;Larsson, Hans C E		Zenodo	biologists	Tahara, Rui;Larsson, Hans C E			
3121BE0C4374FF9CFC7D18FEFAADB570.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14828672/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14828672	Figure 11. Ventral view of reconstructed paranasal sinus system and jaw adductor muscles (M. pterygoideus, M. pseudotemporalis profundus and M. adductor mandibulae posterior) in the lower jaw, palate and maxilla of quail (A–D) and zebra finch (E–H) showing muscular and palatal constraints on paranasal pneumatic extensions. The paranasal sinuses, M. pterygoideus, M. pseudotemporalis profundus and M. adductor mandibulae posterior in the lower jaw, palate and maxilla (A, E), with removal of the lower jaw (B, F), M. pterygoideus (C, G), M. pseudotemporal profundus, M. adductor mandibulae posterior and paranasal sinuses (D), and M. pseudotemporal profundus and M. adductor mandibulae posterior (H). D, shows the maxillary pneumatic extensions into the bone and potential palatine diverticulum in quail, whereas (H) shows the relation of the paranasal sinuses and adipose tissue within the palatine and vomer in the zebra finch. Note that there is no pneumatic chamber within the palate in the zebra finch. The anterior end of the maxilla is fused with the premaxilla in the zebra finch, thus only the posterior portion of the maxilla is shown. Scale bars equal 1 cm. A–D are at same scale and E–H are at same scale.	Figure 11. Ventral view of reconstructed paranasal sinus system and jaw adductor muscles (M. pterygoideus, M. pseudotemporalis profundus and M. adductor mandibulae posterior) in the lower jaw, palate and maxilla of quail (A–D) and zebra finch (E–H) showing muscular and palatal constraints on paranasal pneumatic extensions. The paranasal sinuses, M. pterygoideus, M. pseudotemporalis profundus and M. adductor mandibulae posterior in the lower jaw, palate and maxilla (A, E), with removal of the lower jaw (B, F), M. pterygoideus (C, G), M. pseudotemporal profundus, M. adductor mandibulae posterior and paranasal sinuses (D), and M. pseudotemporal profundus and M. adductor mandibulae posterior (H). D, shows the maxillary pneumatic extensions into the bone and potential palatine diverticulum in quail, whereas (H) shows the relation of the paranasal sinuses and adipose tissue within the palatine and vomer in the zebra finch. Note that there is no pneumatic chamber within the palate in the zebra finch. The anterior end of the maxilla is fused with the premaxilla in the zebra finch, thus only the posterior portion of the maxilla is shown. Scale bars equal 1 cm. A–D are at same scale and E–H are at same scale.	2019-01-24	Tahara, Rui;Larsson, Hans C E		Zenodo	biologists	Tahara, Rui;Larsson, Hans C E			
3121BE0C4374FF9CFC7D18FEFAADB570.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14828656/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14828656	Figure 3. Coronal micro-CT images obtained after soft tissue staining in quail (A–J) and in zebra finch (K–V) illustrate the relationships of the paranasal and paratympanic sinuses and their associated bony and soft tissues. Left and right columns represent approximately similar locations for a comparison of the morphologies between quail and zebra finch.Approximate locations of the micro-CT images (A–V) are indicated with the vertical lines in the reconstructed skulls. No adipose tissue is present in quail (A–D) in contrast to the abundant presence of adipose tissue (white asterisks) in zebra finch (K–P). The white + in (B–D, M, N) indicates the posterior nasal meatus. Note that although the conchal diverticulum of quail (D) and zebra finch (N) are topographically similar, the pneumatic membrane (dashed circle) separates the distal end of the	Figure 3. Coronal micro-CT images obtained after soft tissue staining in quail (A–J) and in zebra finch (K–V) illustrate the relationships of the paranasal and paratympanic sinuses and their associated bony and soft tissues. Left and right columns represent approximately similar locations for a comparison of the morphologies between quail and zebra finch.Approximate locations of the micro-CT images (A–V) are indicated with the vertical lines in the reconstructed skulls. No adipose tissue is present in quail (A–D) in contrast to the abundant presence of adipose tissue (white asterisks) in zebra finch (K–P). The white + in (B–D, M, N) indicates the posterior nasal meatus. Note that although the conchal diverticulum of quail (D) and zebra finch (N) are topographically similar, the pneumatic membrane (dashed circle) separates the distal end of the	2019-01-24	Tahara, Rui;Larsson, Hans C E		Zenodo	biologists	Tahara, Rui;Larsson, Hans C E			
3121BE0C4374FF9CFC7D18FEFAADB570.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14828668/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14828668	Figure 9. Reconstructed paranasal (green) and paratympanic [periotic (orange), and mandibular arch diverticula, including the quadrate, pterygoid and siphoneal diverticula (purple)] sinus systems in the quail (A–C) and zebra finch (D–F) skulls in lateral (A, D), dorsal (B, E) and ventral (C, F) views. Note that the siphoneal diverticulum in the articular and siphonium are indicated in lighter and dark purple, respectively. There is no obvious communication between the two pneumatic systems in both taxa. Also shown are potential palatine diverticulum (light green) and internal maxillary diverticulum (dark green) in quail. The asterisk next to the labelling indicates the internal maxillary diverticulum and siphoneal diverticulum within the siphonium to distinguish from the maxillary diverticulum and siphoneal diverticulum within the lower jaw, respectively. Scale bar equals 1 cm. A–C are at same scale and D–F are at same scale.	Figure 9. Reconstructed paranasal (green) and paratympanic [periotic (orange), and mandibular arch diverticula, including the quadrate, pterygoid and siphoneal diverticula (purple)] sinus systems in the quail (A–C) and zebra finch (D–F) skulls in lateral (A, D), dorsal (B, E) and ventral (C, F) views. Note that the siphoneal diverticulum in the articular and siphonium are indicated in lighter and dark purple, respectively. There is no obvious communication between the two pneumatic systems in both taxa. Also shown are potential palatine diverticulum (light green) and internal maxillary diverticulum (dark green) in quail. The asterisk next to the labelling indicates the internal maxillary diverticulum and siphoneal diverticulum within the siphonium to distinguish from the maxillary diverticulum and siphoneal diverticulum within the lower jaw, respectively. Scale bar equals 1 cm. A–C are at same scale and D–F are at same scale.	2019-01-24	Tahara, Rui;Larsson, Hans C E		Zenodo	biologists	Tahara, Rui;Larsson, Hans C E			
