taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
685F879350530401A2E08B62FBD4C8A3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836681/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836681	Fig. 1. Lasioglossum absimile (Sandhouse, 1924) (holotype ♀): A, lateral habitus; B, face, mesoscutum, and T1 anterior slope; and C, propodeum and metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 1. Lasioglossum absimile (Sandhouse, 1924) (holotype ♀): A, lateral habitus; B, face, mesoscutum, and T1 anterior slope; and C, propodeum and metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F879350540403A2FF884FFDCDCF81.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836685/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836685	Fig. 2. Lasioglossum helianthi (Cockerell, 1916) (♂): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; and D, metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 2. Lasioglossum helianthi (Cockerell, 1916) (♂): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; and D, metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F879350560409A2FF8B50FEFACF48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836687/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836687	Fig. 3. Lasioglossum immigrans new species (♀): A, lateral habitus (holotype); B, face, mesoscutum, and T1 anterior slope (Manitoba specimen); and C, propodeum and metasoma (Manitoba specimen). Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 3. Lasioglossum immigrans new species (♀): A, lateral habitus (holotype); B, face, mesoscutum, and T1 anterior slope (Manitoba specimen); and C, propodeum and metasoma (Manitoba specimen). Scale bars: 1 mm.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F879350560409A2FF8B50FEFACF48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836693/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836693	Fig. 5. T1 anterior slope and acarinarial fan of female: A, Lasioglossum immigrans new species, with fan weakly developed and T1 deeply punctate; and B, Lasioglossum comulum Michener, 1951, with fan well-developed andT1 finely punctate.	Fig. 5. T1 anterior slope and acarinarial fan of female: A, Lasioglossum immigrans new species, with fan weakly developed and T1 deeply punctate; and B, Lasioglossum comulum Michener, 1951, with fan well-developed andT1 finely punctate.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F879350560409A2FF8B50FEFACF48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836705/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836705	Fig. 10. Georeferenced collection records (black squares) and predicted distribution by maximum entropy ecological niche modelling in Maxent (colour shading). Warmer colours indicate higher cloglog probability of occurrence. A, Lasioglossum immigrans; and B, L. onuferkoi. Duplicate records within 0.1 degree were pruned to reduce bias in A, but only exact duplicates were pruned in B owing to the small number of records.	Fig. 10. Georeferenced collection records (black squares) and predicted distribution by maximum entropy ecological niche modelling in Maxent (colour shading). Warmer colours indicate higher cloglog probability of occurrence. A, Lasioglossum immigrans; and B, L. onuferkoi. Duplicate records within 0.1 degree were pruned to reduce bias in A, but only exact duplicates were pruned in B owing to the small number of records.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F879350560409A2FF8B50FEFACF48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836691/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836691	Fig. 4. Lasioglossum immigrans new species (♂): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; D, propodeum and metasoma; E, genital capsule (dorsal view with gonostylus parallel to plane of vision); and F, retrorse lobe (lateral view parallel to plane of vision). Scale bars: A–D, 1 mm; E–F, 0.25 mm.	Fig. 4. Lasioglossum immigrans new species (♂): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; D, propodeum and metasoma; E, genital capsule (dorsal view with gonostylus parallel to plane of vision); and F, retrorse lobe (lateral view parallel to plane of vision). Scale bars: A–D, 1 mm; E–F, 0.25 mm.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F8793505C040BA2FF88DAFB39CA7B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836695/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836695	Fig. 6. Lasioglossum obnubilum (Sandhouse, 1924) (♂): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, propodeum and metasoma; and D, face. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 6. Lasioglossum obnubilum (Sandhouse, 1924) (♂): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, propodeum and metasoma; and D, face. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F8793505E0410A2FF88D7FC2DCFE6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836697/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836697	Fig. 7. Lasioglossum onuferkoi new species (holotype ♀): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; and D, propodeum and metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 7. Lasioglossum onuferkoi new species (holotype ♀): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; and D, propodeum and metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F8793505E0410A2FF88D7FC2DCFE6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836703/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836703	Fig. 9. Diagnostic characters for Lasioglossum onuferkoi new species: A, face of female L. onuferkoi; B, face of female Lasioglossum sheffieldi Gibbs, 2010; C, mesoscutum and tegula of female L. onuferkoi; D, mesoscutum and tegula of female L. sheffieldi; E, metapostnotum of female L. onuferkoi; F, metapostnotum of female Lasioglossum ebmerellum Gibbs, 2010; G, face of male L. onuferkoi; H, face of male L. ebmerellum; I, mesosoma pubescence of male L. onuferkoi; and J, mesosoma pubescence of male Lasioglossum perpunctatum (Ellis, 1913). B, D, F, H, and J reprinted from Gibbs (2010).	Fig. 9. Diagnostic characters for Lasioglossum onuferkoi new species: A, face of female L. onuferkoi; B, face of female Lasioglossum sheffieldi Gibbs, 2010; C, mesoscutum and tegula of female L. onuferkoi; D, mesoscutum and tegula of female L. sheffieldi; E, metapostnotum of female L. onuferkoi; F, metapostnotum of female Lasioglossum ebmerellum Gibbs, 2010; G, face of male L. onuferkoi; H, face of male L. ebmerellum; I, mesosoma pubescence of male L. onuferkoi; and J, mesosoma pubescence of male Lasioglossum perpunctatum (Ellis, 1913). B, D, F, H, and J reprinted from Gibbs (2010).	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F8793505E0410A2FF88D7FC2DCFE6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836705/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836705	Fig. 10. Georeferenced collection records (black squares) and predicted distribution by maximum entropy ecological niche modelling in Maxent (colour shading). Warmer colours indicate higher cloglog probability of occurrence. A, Lasioglossum immigrans; and B, L. onuferkoi. Duplicate records within 0.1 degree were pruned to reduce bias in A, but only exact duplicates were pruned in B owing to the small number of records.	Fig. 10. Georeferenced collection records (black squares) and predicted distribution by maximum entropy ecological niche modelling in Maxent (colour shading). Warmer colours indicate higher cloglog probability of occurrence. A, Lasioglossum immigrans; and B, L. onuferkoi. Duplicate records within 0.1 degree were pruned to reduce bias in A, but only exact duplicates were pruned in B owing to the small number of records.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F8793505E0410A2FF88D7FC2DCFE6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836701/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836701	Fig. 8. Lasioglossum onuferkoi new species (♂): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; D, propodeum and metasoma; E, genital capsule (dorsal view with gonostylus parallel to plane of vision); and F, retrorse lobe (lateral view parallel to plane of vision). Scale bars: A–D, 1 mm; E–F, 0.25 mm.	Fig. 8. Lasioglossum onuferkoi new species (♂): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; D, propodeum and metasoma; E, genital capsule (dorsal view with gonostylus parallel to plane of vision); and F, retrorse lobe (lateral view parallel to plane of vision). Scale bars: A–D, 1 mm; E–F, 0.25 mm.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F879350470413A2E08DEFFCB3C889.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836707/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836707	Fig. 11. Lasioglossum punctatoventre (Crawford, 1907) (♂): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; and D, metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 11. Lasioglossum punctatoventre (Crawford, 1907) (♂): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; and D, metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F879350470413A2E08F2BFD86CD64.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836709/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836709	Fig. 12. Lasioglossum reasbeckae Gibbs, 2010 (♂): A, lateral habitus; B, dorsal habitus; C, face; and D, propodeum and metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 12. Lasioglossum reasbeckae Gibbs, 2010 (♂): A, lateral habitus; B, dorsal habitus; C, face; and D, propodeum and metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F87935046041EA2FF8878FDC2CC10.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836711/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836711	Fig. 13. Lasioglossum stictaspis (Sandhouse, 1923) (♀): A, lateral habitus; B, dorsal habitus; C, face; and D, propodeum and metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 13. Lasioglossum stictaspis (Sandhouse, 1923) (♀): A, lateral habitus; B, dorsal habitus; C, face; and D, propodeum and metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F87935046041EA2FF8878FDC2CC10.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836713/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836713	Fig. 14. Lasioglossum stictaspis (Sandhouse, 1923) (♂; A–B, D–F: holotype): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; D, propodeum and metasoma; E, genital capsule (dorsal view with gonostylus parallel to plane of vision); and F, retrorse lobe (lateral view parallel to plane of vision). Scale bars: A–D, 1 mm; E–F, 0.25 mm.	Fig. 14. Lasioglossum stictaspis (Sandhouse, 1923) (♂; A–B, D–F: holotype): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; D, propodeum and metasoma; E, genital capsule (dorsal view with gonostylus parallel to plane of vision); and F, retrorse lobe (lateral view parallel to plane of vision). Scale bars: A–D, 1 mm; E–F, 0.25 mm.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F87935046041EA2FF8878FDC2CC10.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836721/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836721	Fig. 17. Georeferenced collection records (black squares) and predicted distribution by maximum entropy ecological niche modelling in Maxent (colour shading). Warmer colours indicate higher cloglog probability of occurrence. A, Lasioglossum stictaspis; and B, L. tegulariforme. Duplicate records within 0.1 degree were pruned to reduce bias.	Fig. 17. Georeferenced collection records (black squares) and predicted distribution by maximum entropy ecological niche modelling in Maxent (colour shading). Warmer colours indicate higher cloglog probability of occurrence. A, Lasioglossum stictaspis; and B, L. tegulariforme. Duplicate records within 0.1 degree were pruned to reduce bias.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F8793504A041BA2FF88A2FC3FCF71.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836717/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836717	Fig. 15. Lasioglossum tegulariforme (Crawford, 1907) (holotype ♀): A, lateral habitus; B, dorsal habitus; C, face; and D, metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 15. Lasioglossum tegulariforme (Crawford, 1907) (holotype ♀): A, lateral habitus; B, dorsal habitus; C, face; and D, metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F8793504A041BA2FF88A2FC3FCF71.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836719/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836719	Fig. 16. Lasioglossum tegulariforme (Crawford, 1907) (♂): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; D, propodeum and metasoma; E, genital capsule (dorsal view with gonostylus parallel to plane of vision); and F, retrorse lobe (lateral view parallel to plane of vision). Scale bars: A–D, 1 mm; E–F, 0.25 mm.	Fig. 16. Lasioglossum tegulariforme (Crawford, 1907) (♂): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; D, propodeum and metasoma; E, genital capsule (dorsal view with gonostylus parallel to plane of vision); and F, retrorse lobe (lateral view parallel to plane of vision). Scale bars: A–D, 1 mm; E–F, 0.25 mm.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F8793504A041BA2FF88A2FC3FCF71.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836721/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836721	Fig. 17. Georeferenced collection records (black squares) and predicted distribution by maximum entropy ecological niche modelling in Maxent (colour shading). Warmer colours indicate higher cloglog probability of occurrence. A, Lasioglossum stictaspis; and B, L. tegulariforme. Duplicate records within 0.1 degree were pruned to reduce bias.	Fig. 17. Georeferenced collection records (black squares) and predicted distribution by maximum entropy ecological niche modelling in Maxent (colour shading). Warmer colours indicate higher cloglog probability of occurrence. A, Lasioglossum stictaspis; and B, L. tegulariforme. Duplicate records within 0.1 degree were pruned to reduce bias.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
685F8793504E041AA2FF8C62FD86CAD3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15836725/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836725	Fig. 18. Lasioglossum weemsi (Mitchell, 1960) (♂): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; and D, propodeum and metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 18. Lasioglossum weemsi (Mitchell, 1960) (♂): A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, face; and D, propodeum and metasoma. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2021-11-10	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason		Zenodo	biologists	Gardner, Joel;Gibbs, Jason			
