taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
6D138791DB0AA636FCC3458FD6ACF9CA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15520497/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15520497	Figs 1–4. Growth (cells ml−1) and pigment production of Cyanophora paradoxa in various cultivation conditions: control (CONT), blue light (BLU), nitrogen limitation (N-) and 18 mM of NaCl. Fig. 1. Growth (cells ml−1) of Cyanophora paradoxa for ~27 days. All data are mean ± SD (n = 3). Fig. 2. HPLC-UV chromatogram representation of identified pigments. Fig. 3. Pigment content (mg g−1) of Cyanophora paradoxa. All data are mean ± SD (n = 3). Lettering indicates homogenous subsets (ANOVA, p <0.001, n = 12). Fig. 4. Phycocyanin, allophycocyanin and phycoerythrin content (mg g−1) of Cyanophora paradoxa. All data are mean ± SD (n = 3). Lettering indicates homogenous subsets (ANOVA, p <0.001, n = 12).	Figs 1–4. Growth (cells ml−1) and pigment production of Cyanophora paradoxa in various cultivation conditions: control (CONT), blue light (BLU), nitrogen limitation (N-) and 18 mM of NaCl. Fig. 1. Growth (cells ml−1) of Cyanophora paradoxa for ~27 days. All data are mean ± SD (n = 3). Fig. 2. HPLC-UV chromatogram representation of identified pigments. Fig. 3. Pigment content (mg g−1) of Cyanophora paradoxa. All data are mean ± SD (n = 3). Lettering indicates homogenous subsets (ANOVA, p <0.001, n = 12). Fig. 4. Phycocyanin, allophycocyanin and phycoerythrin content (mg g−1) of Cyanophora paradoxa. All data are mean ± SD (n = 3). Lettering indicates homogenous subsets (ANOVA, p <0.001, n = 12).	2024-03-28	Herbert, Helen;Parkes, Rachel;Barone, Maria Elena;Picciotto, Sabrina;Adamo, Giorgia;Paterna, Angela;Manno, Mauro;Bongiovanni, Antonella;Campion, Eva;Touzet, Nicolas		Zenodo	biologists	Herbert, Helen;Parkes, Rachel;Barone, Maria Elena;Picciotto, Sabrina;Adamo, Giorgia;Paterna, Angela;Manno, Mauro;Bongiovanni, Antonella;Campion, Eva;Touzet, Nicolas			
6D138791DB0AA636FCC3458FD6ACF9CA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15520499/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15520499	Figs 5–7. Fatty acid analysis of Cyanophora paradoxa cultivated under various conditions: control (CONT), blue light (BLU), nitrogen limitation (N-) and 18 mM NaCl. Fig. 5. GC-MS chromatogram representation of identified FAMEs. Fig. 6. FAME proportions (%). Fig. 7. EPA (mg g−1) content. All data are mean ± SD (n = 3). Lettering indicates homogenous subsets (ANOVA, p <0.001, n = 12).	Figs 5–7. Fatty acid analysis of Cyanophora paradoxa cultivated under various conditions: control (CONT), blue light (BLU), nitrogen limitation (N-) and 18 mM NaCl. Fig. 5. GC-MS chromatogram representation of identified FAMEs. Fig. 6. FAME proportions (%). Fig. 7. EPA (mg g−1) content. All data are mean ± SD (n = 3). Lettering indicates homogenous subsets (ANOVA, p <0.001, n = 12).	2024-03-28	Herbert, Helen;Parkes, Rachel;Barone, Maria Elena;Picciotto, Sabrina;Adamo, Giorgia;Paterna, Angela;Manno, Mauro;Bongiovanni, Antonella;Campion, Eva;Touzet, Nicolas		Zenodo	biologists	Herbert, Helen;Parkes, Rachel;Barone, Maria Elena;Picciotto, Sabrina;Adamo, Giorgia;Paterna, Angela;Manno, Mauro;Bongiovanni, Antonella;Campion, Eva;Touzet, Nicolas			
6D138791DB0AA636FCC3458FD6ACF9CA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15520501/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15520501	Figs 8, 9. Relative cell viability of human cancer cell lines exposed to diethyl ether (Et2O), ethyl acetate (EA) and methanol (MeOH) extracts derived from Cyanophora paradoxa at a concentration of 100 µg ml−1 over 72 h. Values are expressed as mean ± SD of three separate experiments, each assay was performed in triplicate. Lettering indicates homogenous subsets (ANOVA, p <0.001, n = 12). Fig. 8. A549 human cancer cell line. Fig. 9. MCF-7 human cancer cell line.	Figs 8, 9. Relative cell viability of human cancer cell lines exposed to diethyl ether (Et2O), ethyl acetate (EA) and methanol (MeOH) extracts derived from Cyanophora paradoxa at a concentration of 100 µg ml−1 over 72 h. Values are expressed as mean ± SD of three separate experiments, each assay was performed in triplicate. Lettering indicates homogenous subsets (ANOVA, p <0.001, n = 12). Fig. 8. A549 human cancer cell line. Fig. 9. MCF-7 human cancer cell line.	2024-03-28	Herbert, Helen;Parkes, Rachel;Barone, Maria Elena;Picciotto, Sabrina;Adamo, Giorgia;Paterna, Angela;Manno, Mauro;Bongiovanni, Antonella;Campion, Eva;Touzet, Nicolas		Zenodo	biologists	Herbert, Helen;Parkes, Rachel;Barone, Maria Elena;Picciotto, Sabrina;Adamo, Giorgia;Paterna, Angela;Manno, Mauro;Bongiovanni, Antonella;Campion, Eva;Touzet, Nicolas			
6D138791DB0AA636FCC3458FD6ACF9CA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15520503/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15520503	Fig. 10. Epi-fluorescence microscopy images of acridine orange stained A549 (A-E) and MCF-7 (F-J) cells following treatment (72 h) with 100 µg ml−1 of Cyanophora paradoxa derived extracts. Untreated cells (A and F) are also included. Scale bar = 100 µm.	Fig. 10. Epi-fluorescence microscopy images of acridine orange stained A549 (A-E) and MCF-7 (F-J) cells following treatment (72 h) with 100 µg ml−1 of Cyanophora paradoxa derived extracts. Untreated cells (A and F) are also included. Scale bar = 100 µm.	2024-03-28	Herbert, Helen;Parkes, Rachel;Barone, Maria Elena;Picciotto, Sabrina;Adamo, Giorgia;Paterna, Angela;Manno, Mauro;Bongiovanni, Antonella;Campion, Eva;Touzet, Nicolas		Zenodo	biologists	Herbert, Helen;Parkes, Rachel;Barone, Maria Elena;Picciotto, Sabrina;Adamo, Giorgia;Paterna, Angela;Manno, Mauro;Bongiovanni, Antonella;Campion, Eva;Touzet, Nicolas			
6D138791DB0AA636FCC3458FD6ACF9CA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15520505/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15520505	Fig. 11. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) projections indicating the relationships between the treatment conditions applied to C. paradoxa and the variables measured (compounds including carotenoids, fatty acids and phycobiliproteins , bioactivity, biomass production).	Fig. 11. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) projections indicating the relationships between the treatment conditions applied to C. paradoxa and the variables measured (compounds including carotenoids, fatty acids and phycobiliproteins , bioactivity, biomass production).	2024-03-28	Herbert, Helen;Parkes, Rachel;Barone, Maria Elena;Picciotto, Sabrina;Adamo, Giorgia;Paterna, Angela;Manno, Mauro;Bongiovanni, Antonella;Campion, Eva;Touzet, Nicolas		Zenodo	biologists	Herbert, Helen;Parkes, Rachel;Barone, Maria Elena;Picciotto, Sabrina;Adamo, Giorgia;Paterna, Angela;Manno, Mauro;Bongiovanni, Antonella;Campion, Eva;Touzet, Nicolas			
