taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
9D7287E18B31FFAEF553FBB47929FC23.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16957586/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16957586	Fig. 2. Comparison of the application of the name Melichrus adpressus. (a) H. Beckler’s M. adpressus sensu Paterson specimen (MEL 2185645) from the northern rivers region of NSW, likely seen by F. von Mueller and cited as M. adpressus in Paterson (1958). Image reproduced with permission from Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria. (b) A specimen of M. adpressus sens. str. collected by Cunningham near Wellington Valley NSW that was seen by De Candolle (1839) and is a candidate for lectotypification (G 00454459). Image © Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève.	Fig. 2. Comparison of the application of the name Melichrus adpressus. (a) H. Beckler’s M. adpressus sensu Paterson specimen (MEL 2185645) from the northern rivers region of NSW, likely seen by F. von Mueller and cited as M. adpressus in Paterson (1958). Image reproduced with permission from Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria. (b) A specimen of M. adpressus sens. str. collected by Cunningham near Wellington Valley NSW that was seen by De Candolle (1839) and is a candidate for lectotypification (G 00454459). Image © Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève.	2025-04-16	Kennedy, Helen T.;Telford, Ian R. H.;Crayn, Darren;Bruhl, Jeremy J.;Andrew, Rose L.		Zenodo	biologists	Kennedy, Helen T.;Telford, Ian R. H.;Crayn, Darren;Bruhl, Jeremy J.;Andrew, Rose L.			
9D7287E18B29FF8BF533FB6979E7F863.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16957588/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16957588	Fig. 4. Character importance analysis of an NMDS ordination (k = 2) for a morphometric dataset comprising 26 characters scored for 90 specimens of Melichrus. Points represent individual plants. See Fig. 1 for a visual key and Table 1 for a textual description of symbols. Each vector represents the magnitude and direction of the influence of a quantitative character that had a statistically significant influence on the ordination space. The average value for each state (Y, affirmative; N, negative) for each binary character is plotted, the corresponding character for numbers 1–5 are listed in Table 2. Abbreviations: C., corolla; L., length; W., width.	Fig. 4. Character importance analysis of an NMDS ordination (k = 2) for a morphometric dataset comprising 26 characters scored for 90 specimens of Melichrus. Points represent individual plants. See Fig. 1 for a visual key and Table 1 for a textual description of symbols. Each vector represents the magnitude and direction of the influence of a quantitative character that had a statistically significant influence on the ordination space. The average value for each state (Y, affirmative; N, negative) for each binary character is plotted, the corresponding character for numbers 1–5 are listed in Table 2. Abbreviations: C., corolla; L., length; W., width.	2025-04-16	Kennedy, Helen T.;Telford, Ian R. H.;Crayn, Darren;Bruhl, Jeremy J.;Andrew, Rose L.		Zenodo	biologists	Kennedy, Helen T.;Telford, Ian R. H.;Crayn, Darren;Bruhl, Jeremy J.;Andrew, Rose L.			
9D7287E18B29FF8BF533FB6979E7F863.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16957600/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16957600	Fig. 11. STRUCTURE bar plots for subset C and subset H, datasets of 2915 and 1568 DArTseq SNPs respectively. Left: subset C, best supported number of ancestral populations, K = 4 major clustering mode. Right: subset H, best supported number of ancestral populations, K = 2, major clustering mode. White lines separate individuals. Black lines separate populations. Each OTU is labelled and the botanical district of each population is given (Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research 2018). Within each OTU, populations are arranged by latitude. Ancestral populations are coloured by the OTU (see Table 1 and Fig. 1) that these primarily but not necessarily exclusively represent. The asterisk (*) indicates M. sp. Wahlmoorum.	Fig. 11. STRUCTURE bar plots for subset C and subset H, datasets of 2915 and 1568 DArTseq SNPs respectively. Left: subset C, best supported number of ancestral populations, K = 4 major clustering mode. Right: subset H, best supported number of ancestral populations, K = 2, major clustering mode. White lines separate individuals. Black lines separate populations. Each OTU is labelled and the botanical district of each population is given (Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research 2018). Within each OTU, populations are arranged by latitude. Ancestral populations are coloured by the OTU (see Table 1 and Fig. 1) that these primarily but not necessarily exclusively represent. The asterisk (*) indicates M. sp. Wahlmoorum.	2025-04-16	Kennedy, Helen T.;Telford, Ian R. H.;Crayn, Darren;Bruhl, Jeremy J.;Andrew, Rose L.		Zenodo	biologists	Kennedy, Helen T.;Telford, Ian R. H.;Crayn, Darren;Bruhl, Jeremy J.;Andrew, Rose L.			
9D7287E18B29FF8BF533FB6979E7F863.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16957604/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16957604	Fig. 13. Observed heterozygosity (HO), expected heterozygosity (HE) and inbreeding coefficient (FIS) for all populations of Melichrus with three or more individuals for a DArTseq dataset of 4936 SNPs. Each tick represents one population. Populations are labelled by OTU (Table 1).	Fig. 13. Observed heterozygosity (HO), expected heterozygosity (HE) and inbreeding coefficient (FIS) for all populations of Melichrus with three or more individuals for a DArTseq dataset of 4936 SNPs. Each tick represents one population. Populations are labelled by OTU (Table 1).	2025-04-16	Kennedy, Helen T.;Telford, Ian R. H.;Crayn, Darren;Bruhl, Jeremy J.;Andrew, Rose L.		Zenodo	biologists	Kennedy, Helen T.;Telford, Ian R. H.;Crayn, Darren;Bruhl, Jeremy J.;Andrew, Rose L.			
