taxonID	type	description	language	source
9C6AC80CFF9879727079F8ADE5DEAA29.taxon	description	More references for each name can be found in Van Welzen et al. (2014).	en	Welzen, P. C. van (2017): Reduction of Breynia subgenus Hemisauropus to B. section Cryptogynium and discussion of the B. quadrangularis complex (Phyllanthaceae). Blumea 62 (2): 90-91, DOI: 10.3767/blumea.2017.62.02.02, URL: https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2017.62.02.02
9C6AC80CFF9979727323FE13E561AC0D.taxon	description	Chakrabarty & Balakrishnan (2015) discuss only differences in morphology. A synthetic approach, also taking into account similarities, may be more clarifying. All other species in section Cryptogynium and subgenus Sauropus have pistillate flowers with horizontal, partly split stigmas resembling a crescent moon. The pistillate flowers in the quadrangularis group have erect, non-crescent moon-like stigmas. This obvious apomorphy, together with transitions between forms, is especially for me important to regard all forms as one, though variable, species. Describing variability is difficult. Two extremes are presented here: splitting into various species (Chakrabarty & Balakrishnan 2015) or uniting all forms into one (Van Welzen et al. 2014) with a description of the variability via notes (Van Welzen 2003). The best way forward will be to use molecular data in a phylogeographic approach to see if the complex contains a single or multiple species. Until such studies have been performed, disagreements like these are likely to persist.	en	Welzen, P. C. van (2017): Reduction of Breynia subgenus Hemisauropus to B. section Cryptogynium and discussion of the B. quadrangularis complex (Phyllanthaceae). Blumea 62 (2): 90-91, DOI: 10.3767/blumea.2017.62.02.02, URL: https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2017.62.02.02
