taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
C7A0504FD6C15C0684C0347B53F54518.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1249013	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.113.139934.figure3	Figure 3. Neoroussoella guizhouensis (GUCC 24-0197, holotype) a appearance on host surface b cultures on PDA from above and below c, d black ascostromata on host surface e – g conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia (h) conidia. Scale bars: 1000 µm (c); 250 µm (d); 50 µm (e, f); 12.5 µm (g); 25 µm (h).	Figure 3. Neoroussoella guizhouensis (GUCC 24-0197, holotype) a appearance on host surface b cultures on PDA from above and below c, d black ascostromata on host surface e – g conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia (h) conidia. Scale bars: 1000 µm (c); 250 µm (d); 50 µm (e, f); 12.5 µm (g); 25 µm (h).	2025-02-12	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong			
C7A0504FD6C15C0684C0347B53F54518.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1249011	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.113.139934.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on combined ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and ef 1 - α sequence data for 79 strains of Roussoellaceae. This tree is rooted with two strains of Versicolorisporium triseptatum (JCM 14775 and NMX 1222). Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.80 (MLBS / BIPP) are given at the nodes. The species obtained in this study are blue, and the ex-type taxa are bold. Bar = 0.07 represents the estimated number of nucleotide site substitutions per branch. The second phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2) was constructed based on a comprehensive polygenic analysis of the ITS, rpb 2, and β-tubulin gene regions, utilizing a dataset that included 22 strains of Xenodidymella, with two outgroup strains, Didymella subrosea (CBS 733.79) and D. subglobispora (CBS 364.91). The final alignment, which accounted for gaps, comprised 1,412 characters (ITS: 1–484, rpb 2: 485–1079, β-tubulin: 1080–1412). These datasets were then used to perform maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses. The ML tree was the primary representation for illustrating the phylogenetic relationships among the diverse taxa within Xenodidymella. This tree elucidated the evolutionary positioning and interrelationships of Xenodidymella and its related species. Notably, our strains (GUCC 24-0205, GUCC 24-0206, and GUCC 24-0207) formed an obviously distinct lineage, separate from other Xenodidymella species, with high support by 100 % MLB and 1.00 BIPP.	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on combined ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and ef 1 - α sequence data for 79 strains of Roussoellaceae. This tree is rooted with two strains of Versicolorisporium triseptatum (JCM 14775 and NMX 1222). Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.80 (MLBS / BIPP) are given at the nodes. The species obtained in this study are blue, and the ex-type taxa are bold. Bar = 0.07 represents the estimated number of nucleotide site substitutions per branch. The second phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2) was constructed based on a comprehensive polygenic analysis of the ITS, rpb 2, and β-tubulin gene regions, utilizing a dataset that included 22 strains of Xenodidymella, with two outgroup strains, Didymella subrosea (CBS 733.79) and D. subglobispora (CBS 364.91). The final alignment, which accounted for gaps, comprised 1,412 characters (ITS: 1–484, rpb 2: 485–1079, β-tubulin: 1080–1412). These datasets were then used to perform maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses. The ML tree was the primary representation for illustrating the phylogenetic relationships among the diverse taxa within Xenodidymella. This tree elucidated the evolutionary positioning and interrelationships of Xenodidymella and its related species. Notably, our strains (GUCC 24-0205, GUCC 24-0206, and GUCC 24-0207) formed an obviously distinct lineage, separate from other Xenodidymella species, with high support by 100 % MLB and 1.00 BIPP.	2025-02-12	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong			
1323726E3A845B0E93CE4C6D42253D16.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1249014	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.113.139934.figure4	Figure 4. Roussoella guizhouensis (GUCC 24-0199, holotype) a cultures on PDA from above and below b bamboo specimen c, d black conidiostromata on host surface e – g conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia h conidia. Scale bars: 500 µm (c); 200 µm (d); 25 µm (e, f); 15 µm (g); 2.5 µm (h).	Figure 4. Roussoella guizhouensis (GUCC 24-0199, holotype) a cultures on PDA from above and below b bamboo specimen c, d black conidiostromata on host surface e – g conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia h conidia. Scale bars: 500 µm (c); 200 µm (d); 25 µm (e, f); 15 µm (g); 2.5 µm (h).	2025-02-12	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong			
1323726E3A845B0E93CE4C6D42253D16.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1249011	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.113.139934.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on combined ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and ef 1 - α sequence data for 79 strains of Roussoellaceae. This tree is rooted with two strains of Versicolorisporium triseptatum (JCM 14775 and NMX 1222). Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.80 (MLBS / BIPP) are given at the nodes. The species obtained in this study are blue, and the ex-type taxa are bold. Bar = 0.07 represents the estimated number of nucleotide site substitutions per branch. The second phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2) was constructed based on a comprehensive polygenic analysis of the ITS, rpb 2, and β-tubulin gene regions, utilizing a dataset that included 22 strains of Xenodidymella, with two outgroup strains, Didymella subrosea (CBS 733.79) and D. subglobispora (CBS 364.91). The final alignment, which accounted for gaps, comprised 1,412 characters (ITS: 1–484, rpb 2: 485–1079, β-tubulin: 1080–1412). These datasets were then used to perform maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses. The ML tree was the primary representation for illustrating the phylogenetic relationships among the diverse taxa within Xenodidymella. This tree elucidated the evolutionary positioning and interrelationships of Xenodidymella and its related species. Notably, our strains (GUCC 24-0205, GUCC 24-0206, and GUCC 24-0207) formed an obviously distinct lineage, separate from other Xenodidymella species, with high support by 100 % MLB and 1.00 BIPP.	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on combined ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and ef 1 - α sequence data for 79 strains of Roussoellaceae. This tree is rooted with two strains of Versicolorisporium triseptatum (JCM 14775 and NMX 1222). Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.80 (MLBS / BIPP) are given at the nodes. The species obtained in this study are blue, and the ex-type taxa are bold. Bar = 0.07 represents the estimated number of nucleotide site substitutions per branch. The second phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2) was constructed based on a comprehensive polygenic analysis of the ITS, rpb 2, and β-tubulin gene regions, utilizing a dataset that included 22 strains of Xenodidymella, with two outgroup strains, Didymella subrosea (CBS 733.79) and D. subglobispora (CBS 364.91). The final alignment, which accounted for gaps, comprised 1,412 characters (ITS: 1–484, rpb 2: 485–1079, β-tubulin: 1080–1412). These datasets were then used to perform maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses. The ML tree was the primary representation for illustrating the phylogenetic relationships among the diverse taxa within Xenodidymella. This tree elucidated the evolutionary positioning and interrelationships of Xenodidymella and its related species. Notably, our strains (GUCC 24-0205, GUCC 24-0206, and GUCC 24-0207) formed an obviously distinct lineage, separate from other Xenodidymella species, with high support by 100 % MLB and 1.00 BIPP.	2025-02-12	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong			
D8BEE9FFE66A5B49A48E5E627FFB99A0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1249015	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.113.139934.figure5	Figure 5. Xenodidymella guizhouensis (GUCC 24-0205, holotype) a cultures on PDA from above and below b appearance on host surface c, d black ascostromata on host surface e – h conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, conidia. Scale bars: 500 µm (c); 100 µm (d); 2.5 µm (e); 12.5 µm (f); 5 µm (g); 2.5 µm (h).	Figure 5. Xenodidymella guizhouensis (GUCC 24-0205, holotype) a cultures on PDA from above and below b appearance on host surface c, d black ascostromata on host surface e – h conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, conidia. Scale bars: 500 µm (c); 100 µm (d); 2.5 µm (e); 12.5 µm (f); 5 µm (g); 2.5 µm (h).	2025-02-12	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong			
D8BEE9FFE66A5B49A48E5E627FFB99A0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1249012	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.113.139934.figure2	Figure 2. The phylogenetic tree generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on combined ITS, β-tubulin, and rpb 2 sequence data for 22 strains of Xenodidymella. This tree is rooted with Didymella subrosea (CBS 733.79) and D. subglobispora (CBS 364.91). Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.80 (MLBS / BIPP) are given at the nodes. The species obtained in this study are blue, and the ex-type taxa are bold. Bar: 0.03 represents the estimated number of nucleotide site substitutions per branch.	Figure 2. The phylogenetic tree generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on combined ITS, β-tubulin, and rpb 2 sequence data for 22 strains of Xenodidymella. This tree is rooted with Didymella subrosea (CBS 733.79) and D. subglobispora (CBS 364.91). Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.80 (MLBS / BIPP) are given at the nodes. The species obtained in this study are blue, and the ex-type taxa are bold. Bar: 0.03 represents the estimated number of nucleotide site substitutions per branch.	2025-02-12	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong			
C58F1021D49D5412A5C4F65CCF9D4985.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1249016	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.113.139934.figure6	Figure 6. Xenoroussoella triseptata (GUCC 24-0202, new geographical record) a appearance on host surface e cultures on PDA from above and below b, c, d black ascostromata on host surface f – h conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia (i) conidia. Scale bars: 500 µm (b); 250 µm (c); 100 µm (d); 12.5 µm (f – h); 25 µm (i).	Figure 6. Xenoroussoella triseptata (GUCC 24-0202, new geographical record) a appearance on host surface e cultures on PDA from above and below b, c, d black ascostromata on host surface f – h conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia (i) conidia. Scale bars: 500 µm (b); 250 µm (c); 100 µm (d); 12.5 µm (f – h); 25 µm (i).	2025-02-12	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong			
C58F1021D49D5412A5C4F65CCF9D4985.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1249011	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.113.139934.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on combined ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and ef 1 - α sequence data for 79 strains of Roussoellaceae. This tree is rooted with two strains of Versicolorisporium triseptatum (JCM 14775 and NMX 1222). Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.80 (MLBS / BIPP) are given at the nodes. The species obtained in this study are blue, and the ex-type taxa are bold. Bar = 0.07 represents the estimated number of nucleotide site substitutions per branch. The second phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2) was constructed based on a comprehensive polygenic analysis of the ITS, rpb 2, and β-tubulin gene regions, utilizing a dataset that included 22 strains of Xenodidymella, with two outgroup strains, Didymella subrosea (CBS 733.79) and D. subglobispora (CBS 364.91). The final alignment, which accounted for gaps, comprised 1,412 characters (ITS: 1–484, rpb 2: 485–1079, β-tubulin: 1080–1412). These datasets were then used to perform maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses. The ML tree was the primary representation for illustrating the phylogenetic relationships among the diverse taxa within Xenodidymella. This tree elucidated the evolutionary positioning and interrelationships of Xenodidymella and its related species. Notably, our strains (GUCC 24-0205, GUCC 24-0206, and GUCC 24-0207) formed an obviously distinct lineage, separate from other Xenodidymella species, with high support by 100 % MLB and 1.00 BIPP.	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on combined ITS, LSU, rpb 2, and ef 1 - α sequence data for 79 strains of Roussoellaceae. This tree is rooted with two strains of Versicolorisporium triseptatum (JCM 14775 and NMX 1222). Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.80 (MLBS / BIPP) are given at the nodes. The species obtained in this study are blue, and the ex-type taxa are bold. Bar = 0.07 represents the estimated number of nucleotide site substitutions per branch. The second phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2) was constructed based on a comprehensive polygenic analysis of the ITS, rpb 2, and β-tubulin gene regions, utilizing a dataset that included 22 strains of Xenodidymella, with two outgroup strains, Didymella subrosea (CBS 733.79) and D. subglobispora (CBS 364.91). The final alignment, which accounted for gaps, comprised 1,412 characters (ITS: 1–484, rpb 2: 485–1079, β-tubulin: 1080–1412). These datasets were then used to perform maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses. The ML tree was the primary representation for illustrating the phylogenetic relationships among the diverse taxa within Xenodidymella. This tree elucidated the evolutionary positioning and interrelationships of Xenodidymella and its related species. Notably, our strains (GUCC 24-0205, GUCC 24-0206, and GUCC 24-0207) formed an obviously distinct lineage, separate from other Xenodidymella species, with high support by 100 % MLB and 1.00 BIPP.	2025-02-12	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong		Zenodo	biologists	Guo, Shi-Qi;Norphanphoun, Chada;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Sha-Min;Sun, Jing-E;Wang, Xing-Chang;Wu, Jiao-Jiao;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Wang, Yong			
