taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
D01587A7111BFF99FC32FEEF8F07FB7D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781687/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781687	Figure 4. (A) Lawomys rokusi holotype first (at left) and second (at right) right molar occlusal surfaces (a-ling, anterolingual cusp; a-lab, anterolabial cusp; md, metaconid; pd, protoconid; ed, entoconid; hd, hypoconid). (B) Lawomys rokusi holotype right mandible showing the posterior break behind the second molar exposing the internal incisor alveolus and the posteriorly rotated second molar. (C) Three mandibles (all shown as from the right side) attributed to Lawomys rokusi (from left to right:LB-MUR-6488, LB-MUR-6484 [mirrored], LB-MUR-6485; top row, lateral view; bottom row, medial view).	Figure 4. (A) Lawomys rokusi holotype first (at left) and second (at right) right molar occlusal surfaces (a-ling, anterolingual cusp; a-lab, anterolabial cusp; md, metaconid; pd, protoconid; ed, entoconid; hd, hypoconid). (B) Lawomys rokusi holotype right mandible showing the posterior break behind the second molar exposing the internal incisor alveolus and the posteriorly rotated second molar. (C) Three mandibles (all shown as from the right side) attributed to Lawomys rokusi (from left to right:LB-MUR-6488, LB-MUR-6484 [mirrored], LB-MUR-6485; top row, lateral view; bottom row, medial view).	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
D01587A7111BFF99FC32FEEF8F07FB7D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781689/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781689	Figure 5. Alveoli of right lower toothrows of two specimens of Lawomys rokusi (left, LB-MUR-6484; middle, LB 36) compared with a specimen of Chrotomys mindorensis (right, AMNH 12972). Specimens scaled to same size.	Figure 5. Alveoli of right lower toothrows of two specimens of Lawomys rokusi (left, LB-MUR-6484; middle, LB 36) compared with a specimen of Chrotomys mindorensis (right, AMNH 12972). Specimens scaled to same size.	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
D01587A7111AFF91FED1FABF8DEFF908.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781687/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781687	Figure 4. (A) Lawomys rokusi holotype first (at left) and second (at right) right molar occlusal surfaces (a-ling, anterolingual cusp; a-lab, anterolabial cusp; md, metaconid; pd, protoconid; ed, entoconid; hd, hypoconid). (B) Lawomys rokusi holotype right mandible showing the posterior break behind the second molar exposing the internal incisor alveolus and the posteriorly rotated second molar. (C) Three mandibles (all shown as from the right side) attributed to Lawomys rokusi (from left to right:LB-MUR-6488, LB-MUR-6484 [mirrored], LB-MUR-6485; top row, lateral view; bottom row, medial view).	Figure 4. (A) Lawomys rokusi holotype first (at left) and second (at right) right molar occlusal surfaces (a-ling, anterolingual cusp; a-lab, anterolabial cusp; md, metaconid; pd, protoconid; ed, entoconid; hd, hypoconid). (B) Lawomys rokusi holotype right mandible showing the posterior break behind the second molar exposing the internal incisor alveolus and the posteriorly rotated second molar. (C) Three mandibles (all shown as from the right side) attributed to Lawomys rokusi (from left to right:LB-MUR-6488, LB-MUR-6484 [mirrored], LB-MUR-6485; top row, lateral view; bottom row, medial view).	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
D01587A7111AFF91FED1FABF8DEFF908.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781689/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781689	Figure 5. Alveoli of right lower toothrows of two specimens of Lawomys rokusi (left, LB-MUR-6484; middle, LB 36) compared with a specimen of Chrotomys mindorensis (right, AMNH 12972). Specimens scaled to same size.	Figure 5. Alveoli of right lower toothrows of two specimens of Lawomys rokusi (left, LB-MUR-6484; middle, LB 36) compared with a specimen of Chrotomys mindorensis (right, AMNH 12972). Specimens scaled to same size.	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
D01587A7111AFF91FED1FABF8DEFF908.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781697/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781697	Figure 7. Morphological comparison of the medial side of the mandible showing the location of features mentioned in text (cr, coronoid process; cm, mandibular foramen; iPT-f, internal pterygoid fossa, co-r, condyloid ridge;rm, retromolar fossa ridge) between(A)LawomysrokusiLB-MUR-6484,(B)Pseudohydromys ellermaniNHMUK ZD1953.277,(C)Echiothrix leucuraNHMUK ZD1897.1.2.46, (D) Hyorhinomys stuempkei NMV C37198, and (E) Chrotomys mindorensis FMNH 222107.	Figure 7. Morphological comparison of the medial side of the mandible showing the location of features mentioned in text (cr, coronoid process; cm, mandibular foramen; iPT-f, internal pterygoid fossa, co-r, condyloid ridge;rm, retromolar fossa ridge) between(A)LawomysrokusiLB-MUR-6484,(B)Pseudohydromys ellermaniNHMUK ZD1953.277,(C)Echiothrix leucuraNHMUK ZD1897.1.2.46, (D) Hyorhinomys stuempkei NMV C37198, and (E) Chrotomys mindorensis FMNH 222107.	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
D01587A7111AFF91FED1FABF8DEFF908.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781713/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781713	Figure 12. Comparison of the lower right toothrow between Lawomys rokusi (LB-MUR-6488), Echiothrix leucura (NHMUK ZD 797.1.2.45; mirrored), Chrotomys whiteheadi (NHMUK ZD 95.8.2.20; mirrored), Pseudohydromys fuscus (NHMUK ZD 53.301), and Hyorhinomys stuempkei (LSUMZ 37060, SEM image modified from Esselstyn et al. [2015]).	Figure 12. Comparison of the lower right toothrow between Lawomys rokusi (LB-MUR-6488), Echiothrix leucura (NHMUK ZD 797.1.2.45; mirrored), Chrotomys whiteheadi (NHMUK ZD 95.8.2.20; mirrored), Pseudohydromys fuscus (NHMUK ZD 53.301), and Hyorhinomys stuempkei (LSUMZ 37060, SEM image modified from Esselstyn et al. [2015]).	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
D01587A7111AFF91FED1FABF8DEFF908.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781717/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781717	Figure 13. Left lower toothrows of Flores murines from Liang Bua scaled to approximately the same size to show occlusal patterns. Delineations of murine body size ranges are also shown.	Figure 13. Left lower toothrows of Flores murines from Liang Bua scaled to approximately the same size to show occlusal patterns. Delineations of murine body size ranges are also shown.	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
D01587A7111AFF91FED1FABF8DEFF908.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781725/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781725	Figure 16. An isolated lower incisor tentatively assigned to Lawomys rokusi with localized burning (carbonized) damage located at the tip of the tooth. Labial (top), lingual (middle and lower right), and occlusal (lower left) views are shown.	Figure 16. An isolated lower incisor tentatively assigned to Lawomys rokusi with localized burning (carbonized) damage located at the tip of the tooth. Labial (top), lingual (middle and lower right), and occlusal (lower left) views are shown.	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
D01587A7111AFF91FED1FABF8DEFF908.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781683/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781683	Figure 2. Plan of Liang Bua showing the locations where specimens of Lawomys rokusi have been recovered. Roman numerals denote specific 2 × 2 m excavation areas and the larger polygon at left shows the area excavated by Theodor Verhoeven in 1965.	Figure 2. Plan of Liang Bua showing the locations where specimens of Lawomys rokusi have been recovered. Roman numerals denote specific 2 × 2 m excavation areas and the larger polygon at left shows the area excavated by Theodor Verhoeven in 1965.	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
D01587A7111AFF91FED1FABF8DEFF908.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781691/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781691	Figure 6. Rokus preparing specimen labels for bones excavated at Liang Bua. Photograph taken 10 July 2007.	Figure 6. Rokus preparing specimen labels for bones excavated at Liang Bua. Photograph taken 10 July 2007.	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
D01587A7111AFF91FED1FABF8DEFF908.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781703/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781703	Figure 8. (A–B) Principal components analysis of 2DGMM comparing murid jaw shape and (C) shape profiles for principal component 1–3 showing the mandibular configuration on the extreme positive (red) and negative (blue) ends.Genus and species names are abbreviated (e.g., ECHcent) for carnivorous murids only. The relative size of the symbol corresponds to species body size. Shapes denote locality; triangles = Sulawesi, circles = New Guinea, diamonds = Philippines, reverse triangles = Sunda, and squares with blue dotted outlines = Flores. Colours denote diet; peach = carnivorous, green = herbivorous, blue = omnivorous. Flores taxa are denoted by number; 1 = Papagomys armandvillei, 2 = Komodomys rintjanus, 3 = Paulamys naso, and 4 = Rattus hainaldi.	Figure 8. (A–B) Principal components analysis of 2DGMM comparing murid jaw shape and (C) shape profiles for principal component 1–3 showing the mandibular configuration on the extreme positive (red) and negative (blue) ends.Genus and species names are abbreviated (e.g., ECHcent) for carnivorous murids only. The relative size of the symbol corresponds to species body size. Shapes denote locality; triangles = Sulawesi, circles = New Guinea, diamonds = Philippines, reverse triangles = Sunda, and squares with blue dotted outlines = Flores. Colours denote diet; peach = carnivorous, green = herbivorous, blue = omnivorous. Flores taxa are denoted by number; 1 = Papagomys armandvillei, 2 = Komodomys rintjanus, 3 = Paulamys naso, and 4 = Rattus hainaldi.	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
D01587A7111AFF91FED1FABF8DEFF908.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781705/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781705	Figure 9. A cluster analysis using Procrustes distances showing the nearest neighbour based on 2DGM results. Colours denotediet;peach =carnivorous,green =herbivorous, blue = omnivorous. Branches highlighted in blue indicate species endemic to Flores. The clustering indicates phenetic similarity and not phylogenetic relationship.	Figure 9. A cluster analysis using Procrustes distances showing the nearest neighbour based on 2DGM results. Colours denotediet;peach =carnivorous,green =herbivorous, blue = omnivorous. Branches highlighted in blue indicate species endemic to Flores. The clustering indicates phenetic similarity and not phylogenetic relationship.	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
D01587A7111AFF91FED1FABF8DEFF908.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781707/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781707	Figure 10. (A) The logged value of the jaw centroid size against the logged value of the lower first molar length (LM1) and (B) an angle measuring incisor orientation (AI).(C–D) Principal components analysis of the in-lever and out-lever distances.Description of variable loadings are provided along each PC.Genus and species names are abbreviated (e.g., ECHcent) for carnivorous murids only. The relative size of the symbol corresponds to species body size. Shapes denote locality; triangles = Sulawesi, circles = New Guinea, diamonds = Philippines, reverse triangles = Sunda, and squares with blue dotted outlines = Flores. Colours denote diet; peach = carnivorous, green = herbivorous, blue = omnivorous. Flores taxa are denoted by number; 1 = Papagomys armandvillei, 2 = Komodomys rintjanus, 3 = Paulamys naso, and 4 = Rattus hainaldi.	Figure 10. (A) The logged value of the jaw centroid size against the logged value of the lower first molar length (LM1) and (B) an angle measuring incisor orientation (AI).(C–D) Principal components analysis of the in-lever and out-lever distances.Description of variable loadings are provided along each PC.Genus and species names are abbreviated (e.g., ECHcent) for carnivorous murids only. The relative size of the symbol corresponds to species body size. Shapes denote locality; triangles = Sulawesi, circles = New Guinea, diamonds = Philippines, reverse triangles = Sunda, and squares with blue dotted outlines = Flores. Colours denote diet; peach = carnivorous, green = herbivorous, blue = omnivorous. Flores taxa are denoted by number; 1 = Papagomys armandvillei, 2 = Komodomys rintjanus, 3 = Paulamys naso, and 4 = Rattus hainaldi.	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
D01587A7111AFF91FED1FABF8DEFF908.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781711/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781711	Figure 11. The relationship between molar length relative to centroid size (logged) against (A) incisor width relative to centroid size (logged) and (B) incisor length relative to centroid size (logged). Genus and species names are abbreviated (e.g., ECHcent) for carnivorous murids only. The relative size of the symbol corresponds to species body size. Shapes denote locality; triangles = Sulawesi, circles = New Guinea, diamonds = Philippines, reverse triangles = Sunda, and squares with blue dotted outlines = Flores. Colours denote diet; peach = carnivorous, green = herbivorous, blue = omnivorous. Flores taxa are denoted by number; 1 = Papagomys armandvillei, 2 = Komodomys rintjanus, 3 = Paulamys naso, and 4 = Rattus hainaldi.	Figure 11. The relationship between molar length relative to centroid size (logged) against (A) incisor width relative to centroid size (logged) and (B) incisor length relative to centroid size (logged). Genus and species names are abbreviated (e.g., ECHcent) for carnivorous murids only. The relative size of the symbol corresponds to species body size. Shapes denote locality; triangles = Sulawesi, circles = New Guinea, diamonds = Philippines, reverse triangles = Sunda, and squares with blue dotted outlines = Flores. Colours denote diet; peach = carnivorous, green = herbivorous, blue = omnivorous. Flores taxa are denoted by number; 1 = Papagomys armandvillei, 2 = Komodomys rintjanus, 3 = Paulamys naso, and 4 = Rattus hainaldi.	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
D01587A7111AFF91FED1FABF8DEFF908.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16781719/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16781719	Figure 14. A comparison of molar and mandibular measurements between Lawomys rokusi (red square) and Flores taxa. Measurements include breadth of the lower first molar (A), lower second molar (B), and maximum length of the mandible (C). Samples of Flores taxa include archaeological and museum specimens grouped according to murine body size class (Veatch et al., 2019), designating murines that are small-bodied (blue; Rattus exulans, Rattus hainaldi), medium-bodied (green; Komodomys rintjanus, Paulamys naso), large-bodied (yellow; Hooijeromys nusatenggara), huge-bodied (orange; Papagomys theodorverhoeveni), and giant-bodied (dark red; Spelaeomys florensis, Papagomys armandvillei). All values are jittered along the Y axes.	Figure 14. A comparison of molar and mandibular measurements between Lawomys rokusi (red square) and Flores taxa. Measurements include breadth of the lower first molar (A), lower second molar (B), and maximum length of the mandible (C). Samples of Flores taxa include archaeological and museum specimens grouped according to murine body size class (Veatch et al., 2019), designating murines that are small-bodied (blue; Rattus exulans, Rattus hainaldi), medium-bodied (green; Komodomys rintjanus, Paulamys naso), large-bodied (yellow; Hooijeromys nusatenggara), huge-bodied (orange; Papagomys theodorverhoeveni), and giant-bodied (dark red; Spelaeomys florensis, Papagomys armandvillei). All values are jittered along the Y axes.	2023-12-13	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.		Zenodo	biologists	Veatch, E. Grace;Fabre, Pierre-Henri;Tocheri, Matthew W.;Sutikna, Thomas;Saptomo, E. Wahyu;Musser, Guy G.;Helgen, Kristofer M.			
