taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
B7065AE4BFA85B829C49ED9650915019.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1330609	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.117.151366.figure2	Figure 2. Morphology of Amphichorda guizhouensis A A. guizhouensis on bird feces B Synnemata C, D Colony obverse and reverse on PDA medium E – H Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia. Scale bars: 5 mm (A); 400 μm (B); 20 mm (C – D); 10 μm (E, G, H); 5 μm (F).	Figure 2. Morphology of Amphichorda guizhouensis A A. guizhouensis on bird feces B Synnemata C, D Colony obverse and reverse on PDA medium E – H Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia. Scale bars: 5 mm (A); 400 μm (B); 20 mm (C – D); 10 μm (E, G, H); 5 μm (F).	2025-05-15	Wang, Yao;Tang, De-Xiang;Chen, Hui;Li, Qi-Rui;Loinheuang, Chanhom;Shen, Xiang-Chun		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Yao;Tang, De-Xiang;Chen, Hui;Li, Qi-Rui;Loinheuang, Chanhom;Shen, Xiang-Chun			
B7065AE4BFA85B829C49ED9650915019.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1330608	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.117.151366.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships of Amphichorda and related genera in the Bionectriaceae based on combined partial nrSSU + ITS + nrLSU + tef 1 α + rpb 1 + rpb 2 sequences. Numbers at the nodes are presented here with ML bootstrap support values (BS) (IQ-TREE- BS IQ> 80 % / RAxML- BS RAx> 80 %) and relevant Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) (PP> 0.90). Strains in bold type are those analyzed in this study.	Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships of Amphichorda and related genera in the Bionectriaceae based on combined partial nrSSU + ITS + nrLSU + tef 1 α + rpb 1 + rpb 2 sequences. Numbers at the nodes are presented here with ML bootstrap support values (BS) (IQ-TREE- BS IQ> 80 % / RAxML- BS RAx> 80 %) and relevant Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) (PP> 0.90). Strains in bold type are those analyzed in this study.	2025-05-15	Wang, Yao;Tang, De-Xiang;Chen, Hui;Li, Qi-Rui;Loinheuang, Chanhom;Shen, Xiang-Chun		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Yao;Tang, De-Xiang;Chen, Hui;Li, Qi-Rui;Loinheuang, Chanhom;Shen, Xiang-Chun			
9AC57BDD09D7510AB11907F837A30B0A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1330610	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.117.151366.figure3	Figure 3. Morphology of Ovicillium pseudoattenuatum A, B Colony obverse and reverse on PDA medium C – I Conidiophores, phialides and conidia J Conidia. Scale bars: 10 mm (A – B); 100 μm (C); 50 μm (D – E); 25 μm (F – I); 10 μm (J).	Figure 3. Morphology of Ovicillium pseudoattenuatum A, B Colony obverse and reverse on PDA medium C – I Conidiophores, phialides and conidia J Conidia. Scale bars: 10 mm (A – B); 100 μm (C); 50 μm (D – E); 25 μm (F – I); 10 μm (J).	2025-05-15	Wang, Yao;Tang, De-Xiang;Chen, Hui;Li, Qi-Rui;Loinheuang, Chanhom;Shen, Xiang-Chun		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Yao;Tang, De-Xiang;Chen, Hui;Li, Qi-Rui;Loinheuang, Chanhom;Shen, Xiang-Chun			
