taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
161496BC9A665CDD83234B7F4C447EB1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1413724	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.122.153767.figure2	Figure 2. Sporocadus changchunensis (HMJAU 60190, holotype). A, B. Ascomata on host surface; C. Vertical section through partial ascoma; D. Ostioles; E. Partial peridium; F. Pseudoparaphyses; G – I. Asci; J. Apical ring (in water); K. Apical ring stained in Melzer’s reagent; L – Q. Development stages of ascospores; R. Culture characteristics on PDA. Scale bars: 500 µm (B); 50 µm (D); 20 µm (E – I); 10 µm (L – Q); 5 µm (J, K).	Figure 2. Sporocadus changchunensis (HMJAU 60190, holotype). A, B. Ascomata on host surface; C. Vertical section through partial ascoma; D. Ostioles; E. Partial peridium; F. Pseudoparaphyses; G – I. Asci; J. Apical ring (in water); K. Apical ring stained in Melzer’s reagent; L – Q. Development stages of ascospores; R. Culture characteristics on PDA. Scale bars: 500 µm (B); 50 µm (D); 20 µm (E – I); 10 µm (L – Q); 5 µm (J, K).	2025-09-11	Xu, Rong;Su, Wenxin;Tian, Shangqing;Bhunjun, Chitrabhanu S.;Li, Yu;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard		Zenodo	biologists	Xu, Rong;Su, Wenxin;Tian, Shangqing;Bhunjun, Chitrabhanu S.;Li, Yu;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard			
B16531C9BD155E50AD48AE9FBD4E0E83.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1413725	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.122.153767.figure3	Figure 3. Sporocadus crataegicola (HMJAU 60191, holotype). A. Leaf of Crataegus pinnatifida; B. Conidiomata on host tissue; C. Section of partial conidioma; D. Close-up of the peridium; E – K. Conidiogenous cells and conidia; L – P. Conidia; Q, R. Culture characteristics on PDA. Scale bars: 100 µm (B, C); 10 µm (D – P).	Figure 3. Sporocadus crataegicola (HMJAU 60191, holotype). A. Leaf of Crataegus pinnatifida; B. Conidiomata on host tissue; C. Section of partial conidioma; D. Close-up of the peridium; E – K. Conidiogenous cells and conidia; L – P. Conidia; Q, R. Culture characteristics on PDA. Scale bars: 100 µm (B, C); 10 µm (D – P).	2025-09-11	Xu, Rong;Su, Wenxin;Tian, Shangqing;Bhunjun, Chitrabhanu S.;Li, Yu;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard		Zenodo	biologists	Xu, Rong;Su, Wenxin;Tian, Shangqing;Bhunjun, Chitrabhanu S.;Li, Yu;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard			
B16531C9BD155E50AD48AE9FBD4E0E83.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1413723	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.122.153767.figure1	Figure 1. The Bayesian 50 % majority-rule consensus phylogram, based on a concatenated ITS, LSU, rpb 2, tef 1 - α, and tub 2 dataset of Sporocadaceae. The tree is rooted with Distononappendiculata banksiae (CBS 143906). RAxML bootstrap support values ≥ 70 % (ML, left) and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 (BPP, right) are shown near the nodes. The new isolates are indicated in red. The type strains are in bold.	Figure 1. The Bayesian 50 % majority-rule consensus phylogram, based on a concatenated ITS, LSU, rpb 2, tef 1 - α, and tub 2 dataset of Sporocadaceae. The tree is rooted with Distononappendiculata banksiae (CBS 143906). RAxML bootstrap support values ≥ 70 % (ML, left) and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 (BPP, right) are shown near the nodes. The new isolates are indicated in red. The type strains are in bold.	2025-09-11	Xu, Rong;Su, Wenxin;Tian, Shangqing;Bhunjun, Chitrabhanu S.;Li, Yu;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard		Zenodo	biologists	Xu, Rong;Su, Wenxin;Tian, Shangqing;Bhunjun, Chitrabhanu S.;Li, Yu;Phukhamsakda, Chayanard			
